On Sun 2012-10-21 18:10:06 UTC+0100, Arthur Chance (free...@qeng-ho.org) wrote:
Now that portmaster officially supports pkgng I've converted to using
it. Is there any reason to keep the old pkg_* programs around, or can I
delete them and add WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS to my /etc/src.conf? I'm running
the old pkg_* programs around, or can I
delete them and add WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS to my /etc/src.conf? I'm running
RELEASE-9.0 on amd64 and will update to REL-9.1 as soon as it arrives if
that matters.
There is no particularly good reason to keep pkg_tools around once
you've made the switch
On 22/10/2012 11:57, mbsd wrote:
I have tried it. There's my report ;)
Without pkg_*, pkg2ng doesn't work.
pkg info shows only himself (pkg-1.0.1). And I have no idea how to
register all this stuff which I have already into pkgng database.
Correct. You need pkg_tools to run pkg2ng. But
On 10/22/12 11:17, andrew clarke wrote:
On Sun 2012-10-21 18:10:06 UTC+0100, Arthur Chance (free...@qeng-ho.org) wrote:
Now that portmaster officially supports pkgng I've converted to using
it. Is there any reason to keep the old pkg_* programs around, or can I
delete them and add
On 10/21/12 18:36, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 21/10/2012 18:10, Arthur Chance wrote:
Now that portmaster officially supports pkgng I've converted to using
it. Is there any reason to keep the old pkg_* programs around, or can I
delete them and add WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS to my /etc/src.conf? I'm running
Now that portmaster officially supports pkgng I've converted to using
it. Is there any reason to keep the old pkg_* programs around, or can I
delete them and add WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS to my /etc/src.conf? I'm running
RELEASE-9.0 on amd64 and will update to REL-9.1 as soon as it arrives
On 21/10/2012 18:10, Arthur Chance wrote:
Now that portmaster officially supports pkgng I've converted to using
it. Is there any reason to keep the old pkg_* programs around, or can I
delete them and add WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS to my /etc/src.conf? I'm running
RELEASE-9.0 on amd64 and will update
Why do pkg_* programs not have a option for changing top level directory
like '-r' (or '--root') in rpm utility ?
It'd be very useful and convenient. Jails would be checked for outdated
(by status-pkg srcipt) or vulnerable (by portaudit) packages more simply
with such options.
Best regards
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 03:42:59PM +0600, Alexey Privalov wrote:
Why do pkg_* programs not have a option for changing top level directory
like '-r' (or '--root') in rpm utility ?
Can't you do this with pkg_add -p and PKG_DBDIR?
Kris
pgpPbOnV42ciF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I haven't been completely happy with portupdate, partly because of the
numerous errors portsdb reports and which don't seem to harm anything or
have any solution, but I decided to install it on my other server anyway,
after running it on my primary server for about six months.
I installed it from
At 09:29 AM 11/19/02 +0700, you wrote:
snip
So can anybody suggest what I can do to restore these? portupdate won't
work without pkg_create, and maybe depends on some of the others as well.
Whoops! My bad. I went to the directory /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install and
discovered that by running 'make'
11 matches
Mail list logo