Re: pkgng and the old pkg_* programs

2012-10-22 Thread andrew clarke
On Sun 2012-10-21 18:10:06 UTC+0100, Arthur Chance (free...@qeng-ho.org) wrote: Now that portmaster officially supports pkgng I've converted to using it. Is there any reason to keep the old pkg_* programs around, or can I delete them and add WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS to my /etc/src.conf? I'm running

Re: pkgng and the old pkg_* programs

2012-10-22 Thread mbsd
the old pkg_* programs around, or can I delete them and add WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS to my /etc/src.conf? I'm running RELEASE-9.0 on amd64 and will update to REL-9.1 as soon as it arrives if that matters. There is no particularly good reason to keep pkg_tools around once you've made the switch

Re: pkgng and the old pkg_* programs

2012-10-22 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 22/10/2012 11:57, mbsd wrote: I have tried it. There's my report ;) Without pkg_*, pkg2ng doesn't work. pkg info shows only himself (pkg-1.0.1). And I have no idea how to register all this stuff which I have already into pkgng database. Correct. You need pkg_tools to run pkg2ng. But

Re: pkgng and the old pkg_* programs

2012-10-22 Thread Arthur Chance
On 10/22/12 11:17, andrew clarke wrote: On Sun 2012-10-21 18:10:06 UTC+0100, Arthur Chance (free...@qeng-ho.org) wrote: Now that portmaster officially supports pkgng I've converted to using it. Is there any reason to keep the old pkg_* programs around, or can I delete them and add

Re: pkgng and the old pkg_* programs

2012-10-22 Thread Arthur Chance
On 10/21/12 18:36, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 21/10/2012 18:10, Arthur Chance wrote: Now that portmaster officially supports pkgng I've converted to using it. Is there any reason to keep the old pkg_* programs around, or can I delete them and add WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS to my /etc/src.conf? I'm running

pkgng and the old pkg_* programs

2012-10-21 Thread Arthur Chance
Now that portmaster officially supports pkgng I've converted to using it. Is there any reason to keep the old pkg_* programs around, or can I delete them and add WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS to my /etc/src.conf? I'm running RELEASE-9.0 on amd64 and will update to REL-9.1 as soon as it arrives

Re: pkgng and the old pkg_* programs

2012-10-21 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 21/10/2012 18:10, Arthur Chance wrote: Now that portmaster officially supports pkgng I've converted to using it. Is there any reason to keep the old pkg_* programs around, or can I delete them and add WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS to my /etc/src.conf? I'm running RELEASE-9.0 on amd64 and will update

pkg_* programs

2005-02-19 Thread Alexey Privalov
Why do pkg_* programs not have a option for changing top level directory like '-r' (or '--root') in rpm utility ? It'd be very useful and convenient. Jails would be checked for outdated (by status-pkg srcipt) or vulnerable (by portaudit) packages more simply with such options. Best regards

Re: pkg_* programs

2005-02-19 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 03:42:59PM +0600, Alexey Privalov wrote: Why do pkg_* programs not have a option for changing top level directory like '-r' (or '--root') in rpm utility ? Can't you do this with pkg_add -p and PKG_DBDIR? Kris pgpPbOnV42ciF.pgp Description: PGP signature

pkg_* programs have disappeared

2002-11-18 Thread Roger Merritt
I haven't been completely happy with portupdate, partly because of the numerous errors portsdb reports and which don't seem to harm anything or have any solution, but I decided to install it on my other server anyway, after running it on my primary server for about six months. I installed it from

Re: pkg_* programs have disappeared

2002-11-18 Thread Roger Merritt
At 09:29 AM 11/19/02 +0700, you wrote: snip So can anybody suggest what I can do to restore these? portupdate won't work without pkg_create, and maybe depends on some of the others as well. Whoops! My bad. I went to the directory /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install and discovered that by running 'make'