n j writes:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> On 14/01/2013 22:44, n j wrote:
>> > One thing to think about would be the option of port maintainers
>> uploading
>> > the pre-compiled package of the updated port (or if the size of the
>> upload
>> > is an issue then ju
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 14/01/2013 22:44, n j wrote:
> > One thing to think about would be the option of port maintainers
> uploading
> > the pre-compiled package of the updated port (or if the size of the
> upload
> > is an issue then just the hash signature o
On 14/01/2013 22:44, n j wrote:
> One thing to think about would be the option of port maintainers uploading
> the pre-compiled package of the updated port (or if the size of the upload
> is an issue then just the hash signature of the valid package archive so
> other people with more bandwidth can
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Matthew Seaman <
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote:
> On 14/01/2013 14:36, n j wrote:
> > The point of my question was exactly if it was possible to elaborate on
> the
> > "pre-compiled packages from FreeBSD official repositories" part. Would it
> > be possibl
On 14/01/2013 14:36, n j wrote:
> The point of my question was exactly if it was possible to elaborate on the
> "pre-compiled packages from FreeBSD official repositories" part. Would it
> be possible to have a (security-wise) up-to-date pre-compiled packages in
> the official repositories? Note, I
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 14/01/2013 13:10, Andrei Brezan wrote:
> > I thing that it's good to wait for ports to compile and to be able to
> > chose your configure options for the packages you install. It's good to
> > know what options you need and what options
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Andrei Brezan wrote:
> On 1/14/2013 1:07 PM, n j wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> One of my primary concerns when managing a system is its security. In the
>> interest of security, I usually hold to that "patch early, patch often".
>> Ports are kept well up-to-date and with
On 14/01/2013 13:10, Andrei Brezan wrote:
> I thing that it's good to wait for ports to compile and to be able to
> chose your configure options for the packages you install. It's good to
> know what options you need and what options you don't and why, that's
> one of the reasons why i'm using Free
On 1/14/2013 1:07 PM, n j wrote:
Hi,
One of my primary concerns when managing a system is its security. In the
interest of security, I usually hold to that "patch early, patch often".
Ports are kept well up-to-date and with portmaster it is not a problem to
keep updating the ports. However, as I
Hi,
One of my primary concerns when managing a system is its security. In the
interest of security, I usually hold to that "patch early, patch often".
Ports are kept well up-to-date and with portmaster it is not a problem to
keep updating the ports. However, as Ivan [1] pointed out on his blog on
10 matches
Mail list logo
