Re: ports hosed

2004-05-03 Thread Jay Moore
On Sunday 04 April 2004 05:24 pm, you wrote: > > But I guess I'm not completely convinced that it'll take far less > > time. I started the K3b port install Friday evening... I'm on about > > the third iteration of portupgrade, and each iteration is an > > _extremely_ long process on this old 350 M

Re: ports hosed

2004-05-03 Thread Kent Stewart
On Monday 03 May 2004 05:20 pm, Jay Moore wrote: > On Sunday 04 April 2004 05:24 pm, you wrote: > > > But I guess I'm not completely convinced that it'll take far less > > > time. I started the K3b port install Friday evening... I'm on > > > about the third iteration of portupgrade, and each iterat

Re: ports hosed

2004-04-04 Thread Jay Moore
On Sunday 04 April 2004 04:08 pm, John Duffey wrote: > > So - again, is there any way to cleanly remove and re-install > > the entire ports tree from the 5.2 cd? > > Try > rm -r /usr/ports > > then << snipped for brevity >> --- > > I'd recommend you try and fix whate

Re: ports hosed

2004-04-04 Thread John Duffey
On 04 Apr, Jay Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So - again, is there any way to cleanly remove and re-install > the entire ports tree from the 5.2 cd? Try rm -r /usr/ports then sysinstall Follow options: =Configure (do post install configuration of FreeBSD) ->

Re: ports hosed

2004-04-04 Thread Kent Stewart
On Sunday 04 April 2004 01:44 pm, Jay Moore wrote: > On Sunday 04 April 2004 03:29 pm, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > Well, done is done... no way I can "back up", and re-visit > > > questions that I've already answered incorrectly. And meanwhile > > > my machine is still crunching forward with the last

Re: ports hosed

2004-04-04 Thread Jay Moore
On Sunday 04 April 2004 03:29 pm, Kent Stewart wrote: > > Well, done is done... no way I can "back up", and re-visit questions > > that I've already answered incorrectly. And meanwhile my machine is > > still crunching forward with the last "portupgrade -a" that I did - > > this will likely contin

Re: ports hosed

2004-04-04 Thread Kent Stewart
On Sunday 04 April 2004 01:10 pm, Jay Moore wrote: > On Sunday 04 April 2004 02:27 pm, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > Bottom line here (in my case) is this: I'm afraid my ports tree > > > may be BFU; this all started when I tried to install the "K3b" > > > port which apparently has a bazillion dependenc

Re: ports hosed

2004-04-04 Thread Jay Moore
On Sunday 04 April 2004 02:27 pm, Kent Stewart wrote: > > Bottom line here (in my case) is this: I'm afraid my ports tree may > > be BFU; this all started when I tried to install the "K3b" port which > > apparently has a bazillion dependencies. At least one of the tar.gz > > files couldn't be loca

Re: ports hosed

2004-04-04 Thread Kent Stewart
On Sunday 04 April 2004 12:27 pm, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Sunday 04 April 2004 12:21 pm, Jay Moore wrote: > > On Sunday 04 April 2004 08:07 am, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > # portupgrade -f lang/ruby18 > > > > Stale dependency: ruby-1.8.1_2 --> openssl-0.9.7d -- manually > > > > run 'pkgdb -F' to f

Re: ports hosed

2004-04-04 Thread Kent Stewart
On Sunday 04 April 2004 12:21 pm, Jay Moore wrote: > On Sunday 04 April 2004 08:07 am, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > # portupgrade -f lang/ruby18 > > > Stale dependency: ruby-1.8.1_2 --> openssl-0.9.7d -- manually run > > > 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force. > > > # pkgdb -F > > > ---> Checkin

Re: ports hosed

2004-04-04 Thread Jay Moore
On Sunday 04 April 2004 08:07 am, Kent Stewart wrote: > > # portupgrade -f lang/ruby18 > > Stale dependency: ruby-1.8.1_2 --> openssl-0.9.7d -- manually run > > 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force. > > # pkgdb -F > > ---> Checking the package registry database > > Stale dependency: openlda

Re: ports hosed

2004-04-04 Thread Clint Gilders
Jay Moore wrote: # portupgrade -f lang/ruby18 Stale dependency: ruby-1.8.1_2 --> openssl-0.9.7d -- manually run 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force. # pkgdb -F ---> Checking the package registry database Stale dependency: openldap-client-2.1.29 -> openssl-0.9.7d (security/openssl): openoffi

Re: ports hosed

2004-04-04 Thread Kent Stewart
On Saturday 03 April 2004 11:00 pm, Vulpes Velox wrote: > On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 01:53:11 -0600 > > Jay Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FreeBSD 5.2 installed from the cd a couple of weeks ago: > > > > I guess I've stepped into it, somehow... the sequence was: > > > > # cvsup -g -L 2 /root/ports-su

Re: ports hosed

2004-04-04 Thread Jay Moore
On Sunday 04 April 2004 03:26 am, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Looks like you need to follow some of the steps in > /usr/ports/UPDATING (specifically, related to ruby). OK, read UPDATING & here's the drill: Steps 1) & 2) went OK, but then: # portupgrade -f lang/ruby18 Stale dependency: ruby-1.8.1_2

Re: ports hosed

2004-04-04 Thread Vulpes Velox
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 01:53:11 -0600 Jay Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FreeBSD 5.2 installed from the cd a couple of weeks ago: > > I guess I've stepped into it, somehow... the sequence was: > > # cvsup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile > # pkgdb -F > #

Re: ports hosed

2004-04-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 01:53:11AM -0600, Jay Moore wrote: > FreeBSD 5.2 installed from the cd a couple of weeks ago: > > I guess I've stepped into it, somehow... the sequence was: > > # cvsup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile > # pkgdb -F > # portupgrade

ports hosed

2004-04-03 Thread Jay Moore
FreeBSD 5.2 installed from the cd a couple of weeks ago: I guess I've stepped into it, somehow... the sequence was: # cvsup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile # pkgdb -F # portupgrade -a The failure appeared to be the result