Re: portupgrade -fa after system upgrade from 5.5 to 6.3

2008-03-14 Thread Lowell Gilbert
RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:59:30 +0100 > bsd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Simply put, the question is: should I force recompile all my >> installed ports since I have updated my system? > > In the long term it's a good idea to do it, but there's no hurry > unles

Re: portupgrade -fa after system upgrade from 5.5 to 6.3

2008-03-14 Thread Lowell Gilbert
bsd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have updated from 5.5 to 6.3 and wanted to know if It advisable to > make a : > > # potupgrade -fa > > > Knowing that I have kept my port tree up to date and have no outdated > ports. > > > Simply put, the question is: should I force recompile all my installed >

Re: portupgrade -fa after system upgrade from 5.5 to 6.3

2008-03-14 Thread RW
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:59:30 +0100 bsd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simply put, the question is: should I force recompile all my > installed ports since I have updated my system? In the long term it's a good idea to do it, but there's no hurry unless you see a specific library problem. You coul

Re: portupgrade -fa after system upgrade from 5.5 to 6.3

2008-03-14 Thread Derek Ragona
At 11:59 AM 3/14/2008, bsd wrote: Hello, I have updated from 5.5 to 6.3 and wanted to know if It advisable to make a : # potupgrade -fa Knowing that I have kept my port tree up to date and have no outdated ports. Simply put, the question is: should I force recompile all my installed ports

portupgrade -fa after system upgrade from 5.5 to 6.3

2008-03-14 Thread bsd
Hello, I have updated from 5.5 to 6.3 and wanted to know if It advisable to make a : # potupgrade -fa Knowing that I have kept my port tree up to date and have no outdated ports. Simply put, the question is: should I force recompile all my installed ports since I have updated my sys

Re: portupgrade -Fa

2003-11-14 Thread Alex de Kruijff
Sorry, Your mail was cougth in my junk box. On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:43:47AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Alex de Kruijff writes: > > >On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:29:40PM +0200, Patrick O'Reilly wrote: > >>The strange part is that on some of the servers the script works just > >>fine, and

Re: portupgrade -Fa

2003-10-13 Thread bsd
Alex de Kruijff writes: On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:29:40PM +0200, Patrick O'Reilly wrote: The strange part is that on some of the servers the script works just fine, and on others it runs, and emails me what looks like a job well done, but the distfile has NOT been fetched. When I then go to do

Re: portupgrade -Fa

2003-10-11 Thread Alex de Kruijff
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:29:40PM +0200, Patrick O'Reilly wrote: > Here's a strange thing: > > I have a number of servers which all run a portupgrade script every > night to fetch the latest distfiles automatically. I then complete the > upgrade when I decide I'm in the mood :) > > The strange

portupgrade -Fa

2003-10-10 Thread Patrick O'Reilly
k O'Reilly #--# # !!! THIS FILE IS MAINTAINED BY PCR!!! # # !!! DO NOT MAKE CHANGES MANUALLY - THEY WILL BE LOST !!! # #--# # Perimeter's cronified "portupgrade -Fa" script # 19/09/2003 11:20