# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-11-09 15:44:19 +0100:
> no, that was a typo. the address was in fact 10.0.0.25.
> turned out it *was* the cable between Lilith and hub 2 after all.
> sounds unbelievable (to me at least), but through all the shuffling
> of the components, this cable must h
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-11-09 10:37:33 +:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 11:23:09AM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
>
> > A picture is worth a thousand words...
> >
> > internet
> >|
> >v
> > eth0/12.34.56.78
> > li
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 11:23:09AM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> A picture is worth a thousand words...
>
> internet
>|
>v
> eth0/12.34.56.78
> linux (NAT)
> eth1/10.1.0.200
>|
>
Hi there,
I have a problem getting routing on a freshly cvsupped STABLE box work
as I need. No surprise, given that I'm not much of a network person,
and this is the first time I'm doing something like that. A picture is
worth a thousand words...
internet
|
