), if that makes any difference
Sorry for the rambling question and I hope this makes sense!
Matt.
Starting with FreeBSD 8 jails may have multiple IPs and can use sockets.
AFAIK this makes a jail pretty much like a separate physical system in a
functional sense. Between man jail
2010/9/24 Bob Hall rjh...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 07:04:06PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
Hi folks,
I just wonder why if_bridge(4) is prefixed by if_ for device name.
Every other device name like lagg(4), gif(4) are not prefixed with
this same one.
if_bridge was based on bridge.
Hi folks,
I just wonder why if_bridge(4) is prefixed by if_ for device name.
Every other device name like lagg(4), gif(4) are not prefixed with
this same one.
Is there any reason that bridge is prefixed with it ? (I don't know if
there is other device like that, but what I saw in conf/NOTES
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 07:04:06PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
Hi folks,
I just wonder why if_bridge(4) is prefixed by if_ for device name.
Every other device name like lagg(4), gif(4) are not prefixed with
this same one.
if_bridge was based on bridge. I assume that when the updated
(20100331/tbfadt-655)
Sincerely!
-
e^(π⋅i) + 1 = 0
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/How-to-fix-the-%22keyboard-dead%22-question---tp29734114p29734114.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:51:31 -0700 (PDT), zaxis z_a...@163.com wrote:
Sometimes after booting freebsd and reaching the slim login screen, i cannot
input anything: the keyboard seems to be dead. Then i have to reboot
freebsd and the problem disappear !
Is this an AT or USB keyboard?
If it
I've had similar results on my USB to PS/2 keyboard adapter. If I reconnect the
bridge device (not necc. have the KB attached to it) it will work.
On Sep 16, 2010, at 8:08 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:51:31 -0700 (PDT), zaxis z_a...@163.com wrote:
Sometimes after booting
I'm helping a new writer use tech pubs lab routers. In trying to use the res
utility, he gets the following:
-bash-2.05b$ res show tp5
-bash: res: command not found
In giving the uname -a command he gets:
-bash-2.05b$ uname -a
FreeBSD bigpink.juniper.net 4.10-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p2
Joanne,
I did a quick which and search of the ports that yielded nothing
concrete regarding this command. I believe that this a proprietary
Juniper utility. I found similar reference to this at this url:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?23,124019,124019
As much as I hate
As an !!! employee !!! of Juniper I would expect that you would know that
the res command is part of the JunOS shell and NOT part of the underlying
FreeBSD OS.
Most especially since you're helping what sounds like a member of the
press, therefore you SHOULD have / SOME / idea of what you are
It's not the first time that almost word for word the same question has been
asked by someone from that domain.
Opportunity is most often missed by people because it is dressed in
overalls and looks like work.
Thomas Alva Edison
Inventor of 1093 patents, including
On Sep 10, 2010, at 7:23 PM, Ross Cameron wrote:
As an !!! employee !!! of Juniper I would expect that you would know that
the res command is part of the JunOS shell and NOT part of the underlying
FreeBSD OS.
Most especially since you're helping what sounds like a member of the
press,
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ross Cameron ross.came...@unix.net wrote:
It's not the first time that almost word for word the same question has
been
asked by someone from that domain.
True but juniper has given a great of IP to BSD. Gracefully handling some
runoff seems appropriate
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 08:58:46PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
It's not the first time that almost word for word the same question has been
asked by someone from that domain.
And not the first time some idiot rude reply caused much
more harm than good.
jerry
Opportunity is most
/mikelking
On Sep 10, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ross Cameron
ross.came...@unix.net wrote:
It's not the first time that almost word for word the same question
has
been
asked by someone from that domain.
True but juniper has given a great
2seconds spent Googling the phrase pulls up my much more polite answer to
exactly the same question from a month ago.
Absolutely no effort was made, that much is OBVIOUS.
In my defense when I realised the the OP thought that this was a Juniper
support list I did offer to try help
Hi,
I'm reading
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html
in preparation for an update of a 6.2-RELEASE machine in a colocation
faciilty. However, that page says 6.3 or later is needed to do it via the
freebsd-update(8) mechanism.
Are
On 09/09/2010 19:40:19, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I'm reading
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html
in preparation for an update of a 6.2-RELEASE machine in a colocation
faciilty. However, that page says 6.3 or later is needed to do
--- On Thu, 9/9/10, Murray S. Kucherawy m...@blackops.org wrote:
From: Murray S. Kucherawy m...@blackops.org
Subject: freebsd-update question
To: questi...@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday, September 9, 2010, 1:40 PM
Hi,
I'm reading
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 325, Issue 5, Message: 4
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:06:33 +0100 Paul Macdonald p...@ifdnrg.com wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for posting on a bsd list but i figure there's more than a few
sendmail experts here.
I would like to run reverse dns checks on one of my
Le Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:17:19 -0700,
Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org a écrit :
PF's route_to will return the packets to the proper router, but I have not
been able to figure out which ones those would be. The source IP
address can be any on either network and its highly likely that we
will see
On 27 August 2010, at 05:07, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Le Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:17:19 -0700,
Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org a écrit :
PF's route_to will return the packets to the proper router, but I have not
been able to figure out which ones those would be. The source IP
address can be any
Will natd forward rtmp:// ???
freebsd# cat /etc/natd.conf
use_sockets
redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.3:3389 10.1.10.172:3389
redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.2:1935 10.1.10.172:1935
redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.2:8790 10.1.10.172:8790
redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.2:6000-6100 10.1.10.172:6000-6100
On 8/27/2010 9:09 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 27 August 2010, at 05:07, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Le Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:17:19 -0700, Doug Hardiebc...@lafn.org a
écrit :
PF's route_to will return the packets to the proper router, but I
have not been able to figure out which ones those would
On 8/27/2010 9:14 PM, Michael J. Kearney wrote:
Will natd forward rtmp:// ???
I am sure libalias and natd know nothing about rtmp.
freebsd# cat /etc/natd.conf
use_sockets
redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.3:3389 10.1.10.172:3389
redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.2:1935 10.1.10.172:1935
redirect_port
I have several servers with one ethernet interface. Currently it is connected
via a WAN to the internet. We are in the midst of switching to a different
provider. I would like to be able to operate with both temporarily until all
the users/services get switched. The new circuit is in and
Hi,
Sorry for posting on a bsd list but i figure there's more than a few
sendmail experts here.
I would like to run reverse dns checks on one of my boxes but the
check_rnds macro looks a bit overkill to me.
I want to reject the mail if there's no reverse dns, but not if there is
rdns but
a RaidZ but have a question on how to do this:
Basically, I need to setup a mirror with the two empty drives, copy the
data over and then add the third. Is that even possible?
Do you want to add the third drive as another mirror of the other two or
you
just want to add it, lets say
Hi, I'm building a new file server. Right now I'm on FreeBSD 6.4/UFS2
and going to go to 8.1 with ZFS.
Right now I have 3 disks, but one of them has data on it. I'd like to
setup a RaidZ but have a question on how to do this:
Basically, I need to setup a mirror with the two empty drives
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Depo Catcher depocatc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm building a new file server. Right now I'm on FreeBSD 6.4/UFS2 and
going to go to 8.1 with ZFS.
in a few weeks, ZFS v15 will be MFC'd to RELENG_8 this is a much more
mature and stable ZFS
I would suggest that
On 16/08/2010 8:56 AM, Depo Catcher wrote:
Hi, I'm building a new file server. Right now I'm on FreeBSD 6.4/UFS2 and
going to go to 8.1 with ZFS.
Right now I have 3 disks, but one of them has data on it. I'd like to setup
a RaidZ but have a question on how to do this:
Basically, I need
). In
fact, one of those power fluxes occurred last night. I love storms
for the light shows, but hate them for the toll they take on my
servers.
Indeed. Ryan, I'm coming in late but I've read the whole thread, after
many people have added useful insights.
However I must question your initial
What would cause this error?
einstein:~ chris$ telnet ns1 110
Trying *...
Connected to ns1.**.org.
Escape character is '^]'.
+OK QPOP (version 2.53) at ns1.*.org starting.
30383.1281808...@ns1.**.org
user luis
+OK Password required for luis.
pass **
-ERR Unable to process
On 14.08.2010 21:58, Chris Maness wrote:
Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change recognition modes
Here[1] you can find pretty good explanation.
Be well.
[1] - http://marc.info/?l=pine-infom=96822028906940w=2
___
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Mikhail hidden.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14.08.2010 21:58, Chris Maness wrote:
Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change recognition modes
Here[1] you can find pretty good explanation.
Be well.
[1] - http://marc.info/?l=pine-infom=96822028906940w=2
On 14.08.2010 22:16, Chris Maness wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Mikhailhidden.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14.08.2010 21:58, Chris Maness wrote:
Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change recognition modes
Here[1] you can find pretty good explanation.
Be well.
[1] -
Just going to reply to this one bit for now: The computer used to be a gaming
computer, converted this past fall into a file server when I lacked time to
play any games in a year.
Additionally I spent $34 on a video card today that reduces my power
consumption by 150Watts, resulting in a $13
On Thu, August 12, 2010 8:14 pm, Al Plant wrote:
#3. Thats why setting the bios not to self boot would work. (Stopping
the bios from turning the server on after an outage.) Someone would have
to check the power status manually before throwing the switch manually
to make it come up after power
On Wed, August 11, 2010 1:18 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:06 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, August 11, 2010 12:25 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
He thinks that at 500W needed it would give me about 12 minutes on a
1400VA. My consideration is, then, give the server 2 minutes on
On Aug 11, 2010, at 6:01 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, August 11, 2010 1:18 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:06 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, August 11, 2010 12:25 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
He thinks that at 500W needed it would give me about 12 minutes on a
1400VA. My
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Ryan Coleman ryan.cole...@cwis.biz wrote:
He thinks that at 500W needed it would give me about 12 minutes on
a 1400VA.
That W and VA numbers of the UPS are pretty much irrelevant,
because they tell nothing about the capacity of the battery.
Those numbers only give
Hello,
Where would I find startx? I assume it is part one of the ports under
X11
but I don't want to install all of them to find it.
Also, is p5-Tk the same as Perl/Tk?
Best regards,
Fred
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Fred Boatwright f...@blakemfg.com wrote:
Where would I find startx? I assume it is part one of the ports
under X11 but I don't want to install all of them to find it.
It's in x11/xinit. You can use porgle to find out:
http://www.secnetix.de/tools/porgle/porgle.py?w=pq=startx
It has four
David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, August 11, 2010 1:18 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:06 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, August 11, 2010 12:25 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
He thinks that at 500W needed it would give me about 12 minutes on a
1400VA. My consideration is, then, give the
/usr/ports/x11/xinit
On my system (with X, obviously, already installed):
beta# whereis startx
startx: /usr/local/bin/startx /usr/local/man/man1/startx.1.gz
beta# pkg_which /usr/local/bin/startx
xinit-1.2.0
beta# whereis xinit
xinit: /usr/local/bin/xinit /usr/local/man/man1/xinit.1.gz
On Aug 12, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Al Plant wrote:
David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, August 11, 2010 1:18 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:06 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, August 11, 2010 12:25 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
He thinks that at 500W needed it would give me about 12 minutes
On Aug 12, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
Yes. The downside comes from when the BIOS is told to turn on the
server at, say, 10pm and the power is still out... it starts the
process and runs out of battery mid-way through the boot before it
gets the chance to load the UPS
Hi Oliver and Tim,
I installed xinit but startx still doesn't exist. whereis returns
nothing and man startx returns nothing.
Fred
Tim Kellers wrote:
/usr/ports/x11/xinit
On my system (with X, obviously, already installed):
beta# whereis startx
startx: /usr/local/bin/startx
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:49 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
Yes. The downside comes from when the BIOS is told to turn on the server at,
say, 10pm and the power is still out... it starts the process and runs out
of battery mid-way through the boot
pkg_info | grep xinit
rehash (if using some *csh)
which startx
?
Samuel Martín Moro
{EPITECH.} tek4
CamTrace S.A.S
(+033) 1 41 38 37 60
1 Allée de la Venelle
92150 Suresnes
FRANCE
Nobody wants to say how this works.
Maybe nobody knows ...
Xorg.conf(5)
On Thu,
Fred,
From man startx(1):
SEE ALSO
xinit(1), X(7), Xserver(1), Xorg(1), xorg.conf(5)
Try:
# whereis X
If X is installed, it should return:
# X: /usr/local/bin/X
pkg_which if X is installed should return:
# pkg_which /usr/local/bin/X
xorg-server-1.7.5,1
If it doesn't, then the
pkg_info | grep xinit doesn't return anything
rehash
which startx
startx: Command not found
whereis X
X: /usr/local/bin/X
pkg_which /usr/local/bin/X
pkg_which: Command not found
Oliver: I used your porgle tool to find pkg_which and will install it
later. Porgle appears to be a very useful
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Fred Boatwright f...@blakemfg.com wrote:
pkg_info | grep xinit doesn't return anything
then, you doesn't have installed xinit, and startx can't be here
pkg_add -rv xinit
and then, if it doesn't fail, try again:
rehash
which startx
rehash
which startx
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Fred Boatwright wrote:
[snip]
I installed x11-servers/xorg-server but maybe should have installed Xorg
instead. However, from looking at the pkg-descr for xorg it looks like
it will install a huge amount of software that will not get used. I am
reluctant to do this. I
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Chris Hill wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Fred Boatwright wrote:
[snip]
I installed x11-servers/xorg-server but maybe should have installed Xorg
instead. However, from looking at the pkg-descr for xorg it looks like it
will install a huge amount of software that will not
Indeed you are right. I installed xinit from ports but something didn't
happen as it should have. I tried again using pkg_add as you suggested
and startx does exist now.
I installed olvwm several days ago and it did not pull in the xorg stuff
also.
Thanks for the help!
Best regards,
Fred
Ryan Coleman wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Al Plant wrote:
David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, August 11, 2010 1:18 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:06 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, August 11, 2010 12:25 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
He thinks that at 500W needed it would give
I know that APC's website states this load on this unit results in this runtime.
However I do not trust these figures, typically, when coming from smaller
manufacturers than APC.
I am looking at a 1400VA / 980W UPS to run a single server with a usually not
on monitor, a DSL modem and a simple
Hi, Ryan--
On Aug 11, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
Total: 495W
According to a calculator if I enter all that information:
http://www.csgnetwork.com/upssizecalc.html
It says that it will use 693VA.
That sounds reasonable. The better PSUs have 80 Plus certification for
efficiency,
Thanks, Chuck.
I talked with a former colleague that has a lot of experience in specing out
UPS requirements (between battery-ready and generator-ready backups at the
office they have up to 5 minutes of battery backup before the gas generator is
needed with a 128-hour recharge time just to
On Wed, August 11, 2010 12:25 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
He thinks that at 500W needed it would give me about 12 minutes on a
1400VA. My consideration is, then, give the server 2 minutes on battery.
If full power has not been returned, shut down the server but leave the
modem (w/ wireless) and
On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:06 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, August 11, 2010 12:25 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
He thinks that at 500W needed it would give me about 12 minutes on a
1400VA. My consideration is, then, give the server 2 minutes on battery.
If full power has not been returned, shut down
Ryan Coleman ryan.cole...@cwis.biz wrote:
He thinks that at 500W needed it would give me about 12 minutes on
a 1400VA.
That W and VA numbers of the UPS are pretty much irrelevant,
because they tell nothing about the capacity of the battery.
Those numbers only give an upper limit on the power
On 9/08/2010 2:52 AM, krad wrote:
On 8 August 2010 16:51, Adam Vande Moreamvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Dick Hoogendijkd...@nagual.nl wrote:
On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Yes. It works very well.
On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out
to
troubleshoot?
ZFS. No question about it. Thank you for this eye opener. ;-)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Years back I ran FreeBSD, so I have some experience. The last couple
of years I ran Solaris, followed by Opensolaris. I am very satisfied.
However, considering the troubles after Oracle took over I have rebuild
my server system under FreeBSD-8.1 (now running as a virtual machine
under
in sysinstall, I can't see any good reasons to avoid
it. However, it's your system, and booting from UFS also works very
well, so do whatever pleases you.
There's more of a question over whether it's a good idea to put swap
onto zfs -- I think the recommendation is still to prefer using a raw
partition
.
Hmmm... well, booting FreeBSD off ZFS works perfectly well. Apart from
the lack of support in sysinstall, I can't see any good reasons to avoid
it. However, it's your system, and booting from UFS also works very
well, so do whatever pleases you.
There's more of a question over whether it's
On Sunday 08 of August 2010 14:43:48 Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
Years back I ran FreeBSD, so I have some experience. The last couple
of years I ran Solaris, followed by Opensolaris. I am very satisfied.
However, considering the troubles after Oracle took over I have rebuild
my server system
On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Yes. It works very well.
On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out of the box (so to
speak) which will work fine for most purposes. Of course, if your
system has particularly demanding IO patterns, then you may have to
tweak some loader.conf or
On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Yes. It works very well.
On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out of the box (so to
speak) which will work fine for most purposes.
One other thing comes to mind. I want a very robus, fast rockl solid
*server*
It will be a file- email and
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Dick Hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote:
On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Yes. It works very well.
On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out of the box (so to
speak) which will work fine for most purposes.
One other thing comes to mind. I want
On 8 August 2010 16:51, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Dick Hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote:
On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Yes. It works very well.
On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out of the box (so to
speak)
I have a question about what I am seeing on several servers. These are 4 core
machines with more than the needed memory. Load is never above .5 and memory
usually shows over half free. I have never seen it even close to the limit
(including buffers). Basically these are lightly used servers
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 01:12:27 -0700
Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
I have a question about what I am seeing on several servers. These
are 4 core machines with more than the needed memory. Load is never
above .5 and memory usually shows over half free. I have never seen
it even close
On 1 August 2010, at 03:42, RW wrote:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 01:12:27 -0700
Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
I have a question about what I am seeing on several servers. These
are 4 core machines with more than the needed memory. Load is never
above .5 and memory usually shows over half
Hi,
I've set up remote syslog, and want to have a program specification that will
send some messages to the remote server. Right now, I've got the usual 'send
everything to the loghost' in syslog.conf:
*.*@loghost
and what I want to do is:
send everything from any facility.level
send everything from any facility.level to the loghost EXCEPT things from
$program that's level .info or lower. (so anything that's from
$program.notice
*.notice @loghost
If your program logs to a give facility, for example your program logs
to local7:
local7.notice @loghost
anything
Hi;
System: 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Jun 11 09:41:37 BRT 2010
i386
The question is about how pf acts on an specific situation.
Supose I have the following rules:
pass in log inet proto tcp from $int_if to any port 8021
flags S/SA keep state tag test
rule 2
rule 3
Sorry. Forgot to ask:
Will the packet be actually tagged on the first rule, even though rule parsing
continues? will it reach the last rule already tagged?
Thanks again.
Hi;
System: 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Jun 11 09:41:37 BRT 2010
i386
The question is about how pf acts
Sorry. Forgot to ask:
Will the packet be actually tagged on the first rule, even though rule parsing
continues? will it reach the last rule already tagged?
Thanks again.
Hi;
System: 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Jun 11 09:41:37 BRT 2010
i386
The question is about how pf acts
On 16/07/2010 18:22:04, Mario Lobo wrote:
Hi;
System: 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Jun 11 09:41:37 BRT
2010
i386
The question is about how pf acts on an specific situation.
Supose I have the following rules:
pass in log inet proto tcp from $int_if to any port
On Friday 16 July 2010 20:58:31 Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 16/07/2010 18:22:04, Mario Lobo wrote:
Hi;
System: 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Jun 11 09:41:37 BRT
2010 i386
The question is about how pf acts on an specific situation.
Supose I have the following rules
On 29 June 2010 19:33, Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org wrote:
I created a raidz ZFS that is mounted on /mnt/backup
It has subdirectories (not ZFS filesystems or volumes) like:
/mnt/backup/wavehh
/mnt/backup/joker
[etc]
I started taking snapshots long ago, and the snapshots are of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/06/2010 04:34:10, Richards, Toby wrote:
So as far as I can tell, turning Linux Mode on exposes another threat
vector. Can I turn on Linux Mode ONLY for a single binary (the Flash
plugin)?
Unfortunately no. Enabling the linuxulator loads a
I created a raidz ZFS that is mounted on /mnt/backup
It has subdirectories (not ZFS filesystems or volumes) like:
/mnt/backup/wavehh
/mnt/backup/joker
[etc]
I started taking snapshots long ago, and the snapshots are of
backup@date, that means top level.
NAME USED AVAIL REFER
I have to say that I really feel the FreeBSD development model and Ports system
to be superior to Linux. I want to use it; however, Adobe Flash is important to
me. I understand that I can run Linux Flash with FreeBSD's Linux Mode. My
question is this: If I turn on Linux mode, don't I sacrifice
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:57:33 -0700, Richards, Toby
toby.richa...@slo.courts.ca.gov wrote:
My question is this: If I turn on Linux mode, don't I sacrifice the
security, performance, and other benefits of the FreeBSD kernel vice
Linux?
No. FreeBSD's Linux mode is nothing more or less than
@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Question RE: Linux Mode
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:57:33 -0700, Richards, Toby
toby.richa...@slo.courts.ca.gov wrote:
My question is this: If I turn on Linux mode, don't I sacrifice the
security, performance, and other benefits of the FreeBSD kernel vice
Linux?
No. FreeBSD's Linux
mfid0 cache settings:
I/O caching: disabled
write caching: write-back
read ahead: none
drive write cache: default
I read in the man page of mfiutil that drive write cache is the cache
on the physical drive which should be disable for data integrity. My
first question
Hi,
Ah, I see.
So if I need a more advanced version of some software, that has been
installed as a package, I can use portupgrade (or other port
management tools) to upgrade the package to a port. Am I right?
Thanks,
Antonio
(As a newbie I'm somewhat concerned about keeping consistency between
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Antonio Vieiro
anto...@antonioshome.net wrote:
Hi,
Ah, I see.
So if I need a more advanced version of some software, that has been
installed as a package, I can use portupgrade (or other port
management tools) to upgrade the package to a port. Am I right?
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Vinay vinay.par...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am new to FreeBSD. I have installed FreeBSD 6.3 and was playing with
gvinum.
snip
Can you let me know what am i missing?
You should use a current release of FreeBSD, if 6.3 is still supported it
won't be for much
Hi all,
I can't find an answer to this question, so I decided to post here.
Since I'm not very good at english let me ask this with an example.
I assume that packages and ports may have different versions of the
same software (am I right?) so, for instance, if you install gnome
with packages you
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 04:58:56PM +0200, Antonio Vieiro wrote:
Hi all,
I can't find an answer to this question, so I decided to post here.
Since I'm not very good at english let me ask this with an example.
I assume that packages and ports may have different versions of the
same software
Hi,
I am new to FreeBSD. I have installed FreeBSD 6.3 and was playing with
gvinum.
I do not see /dev/gvinum tree. I have these modules loaded.
freebsd63# kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
1 23 0xc040 7b2d2c kernel
21 0xc0bb3000 cd44 geom_bde.ko
31 0xc0bc 3a48
I have DAGS and cannot find a good explanation for this, so if some kind
soul could help it would be appreciated...
I use FreeBSD (various versions/flavors) to connect to a USB drive
shared off a WinXP machine to write large backup files. I mount this
using the SMBFS capabilities. On a pretty
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Coert lgro...@waagmeester.co.za wrote:
Hello all,
Just a question, on Linux the output of top's memory usage looks like this:
Mem: 2075424k total, 1760848k used, 314576k free, 151872k buffers
Swap: 4192924k total, 0k used, 4192924k free
On 28/05/2010 08:47, Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 18:41:21 +0200, Coert lgro...@waagmeester.co.za wrote:
Hello all,
Is there a FreeBSD equivalent for the linux cp -u ?
http://linux.die.net/man/1/cp (-u, --update)
Check out cpdup (available via ports or packages).
On Mon, 31 May 2010 11:20:11 +0200
Mark Stapper st...@mapper.nl wrote:
On 28/05/2010 08:47, Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 18:41:21 +0200, Coert
lgro...@waagmeester.co.za wrote:
Hello all,
Is there a FreeBSD equivalent for the linux cp -u ?
http://linux.die.net/man/1/cp
801 - 900 of 9091 matches
Mail list logo
