On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:11:50 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block articulated:
> On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote:
>
> > When using 'portupgrade', I commonly use the '-r' flag in
> > conjunction with the previously discussed '-a' flag. While not as
> > through as the "-u -p" flags with 'portmanger', it does a
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:11:50 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote:
>
> > When using 'portupgrade', I commonly use the '-r' flag in
> > conjunction with the previously discussed '-a' flag. While not as
> > through as the "-u -p" flags with 'portmanger', it does accompl
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote:
When using 'portupgrade', I commonly use the '-r' flag in conjunction
with the previously discussed '-a' flag. While not as through as the
"-u -p" flags with 'portmanger', it does accomplish its goal.
Isn't portupgrade -a equivalent to -arR? I hope so, or I ha
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:21:59 -0700, Fred wrote:
Hello,
According to man portmaster the -a option will "Update all ports that
need updating". Does this apply to only installed ports or to
everything in /usr/ports?
It applies to installed ports. A common
s or to
> > everything in /usr/ports?
>
> It applies to installed ports. A commonly used command to
> upgrade them is "portupgrad -af".
^^^
Using the 'f' flag can be expensive if there are a large number of
ports installed and th
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:21:59 -0700, Fred wrote:
> Hello,
>
> According to man portmaster the -a option will "Update all ports that
> need updating". Does this apply to only installed ports or to
> everything in /usr/ports?
It applies to installed ports. A commonly used command to
upgrade them
Hello,
According to man portmaster the -a option will "Update all ports that
need updating". Does this apply to only installed ports or to
everything in /usr/ports?
Best regards,
Fred
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
Would any folks with experience in Apache/SSL be willing to
help with a (probably novice) problem off-list?
(My search-fu is inferior: I've found the problem mentioned,
but no solutions.)
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-
On 10/27/2010 3:26 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:51:59 -0500, Tim Daneliuk
> wrote:
>> A bit OT, but I'm hoping one of you resident geniuses can point me to
>> an answer
>>
>> I have a situation where I need to set up round-robin across several
>> smart hosts in the se
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:51:59 -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> A bit OT, but I'm hoping one of you resident geniuses can point me to
> an answer
>
> I have a situation where I need to set up round-robin across several
> smart hosts in the sendmail mailertable for all traffic. (For a
> variety of re
A bit OT, but I'm hoping one of you resident geniuses can point
me to an answer
I have a situation where I need to set up round-robin across several smart
hosts in the sendmail mailertable for all traffic. (For a variety of
reasons, the client does not want this done in either the .mc file or
Hi,
I'm trying to understand some pieces of the FreeBSD kernel.
Having a look at struct fileops in file.h I was wondering why other file related
functions don't have an entry in the vector. I was thinking in mmap, fsync or
sendfile.
Can anyone tell me the reason?
Thanks in advance.
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 333, Issue 2, Message: 1
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:38:17 -0400 bdsf...@att.net wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:32:44 -0400, Jerry
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:35:39 -0400
> > Fbsd8 articulated:
> >
> >> Check out qjail. It has been submitted for ad
.py which I've used to create a
> thousand very light-weight jails which are started and managed using
> only standard FreeBSD tools.
>
> In any case, read rc.conf(5) man page for the jail_* settings.
snip
> This is the more complex question; I think that everything which needs
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:38:17 -0400
bdsf...@att.net articulated:
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:32:44 -0400, Jerry
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:35:39 -0400
> > Fbsd8 articulated:
> >
> >> Check out qjail. It has been submitted for addition to the ports
> >> collection, but the ports dept is
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:32:44 -0400, Jerry
wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:35:39 -0400
Fbsd8 articulated:
Check out qjail. It has been submitted for addition to the ports
collection, but the ports dept is very slow in performing their task
of adding new ports to the system. So in the mean tim
terfaces in failover
mode (one public, one private), if that makes any difference
This is the more complex question; I think that everything which needs
direct access to the NIC (i.e. BPF, DHCP, IPFW, etc.) will need to be
run on the host system. TCP services will work inside jails without
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:35:39 -0400
Fbsd8 articulated:
> Check out qjail. It has been submitted for addition to the ports
> collection, but the ports dept is very slow in performing their task
> of adding new ports to the system. So in the mean time you can get
> qjail from here. http://sourcefo
s for openvpn and the
services jail or is it possible to use a single IP or some NAT/PAT scheme?
-this box currently has 4 x NICs split into 2x lagg interfaces in failover
mode (one public, one private), if that makes any difference
Sorry for the rambling question and I hope this makes sense!
e a single IP or some NAT/PAT scheme?
>> -this box currently has 4 x NICs split into 2x lagg interfaces in failover
>> mode (one public, one private), if that makes any difference
>>
>> Sorry for the rambling question and I hope this makes sense!
>>
>&g
I use separate public IPs for openvpn and the
services jail or is it possible to use a single IP or some NAT/PAT scheme?
-this box currently has 4 x NICs split into 2x lagg interfaces in failover
mode (one public, one private), if that makes any difference
Sorry for the rambling question and I hope
d the
services jail or is it possible to use a single IP or some NAT/PAT scheme?
-this box currently has 4 x NICs split into 2x lagg interfaces in failover
mode (one public, one private), if that makes any difference
Sorry for the rambling question and I hope this makes sense!
2010/9/24 Bob Hall :
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 07:04:06PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I just wonder why if_bridge(4) is prefixed by if_ for device name.
>> Every other device name like lagg(4), gif(4) are not prefixed with
>> this same one.
>
> if_bridge was based on bridge. I a
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 07:04:06PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I just wonder why if_bridge(4) is prefixed by if_ for device name.
> Every other device name like lagg(4), gif(4) are not prefixed with
> this same one.
if_bridge was based on bridge. I assume that when the updated if
Hi folks,
I just wonder why if_bridge(4) is prefixed by if_ for device name.
Every other device name like lagg(4), gif(4) are not prefixed with
this same one.
Is there any reason that bridge is prefixed with it ? (I don't know if
there is other device like that, but what I saw in conf/NOTES seems
I've had similar results on my USB to PS/2 keyboard adapter. If I reconnect the
bridge device (not necc. have the KB attached to it) it will work.
On Sep 16, 2010, at 8:08 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:51:31 -0700 (PDT), zaxis wrote:
>>
>> Sometimes after booting freebsd and re
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:51:31 -0700 (PDT), zaxis wrote:
>
> Sometimes after booting freebsd and reaching the slim login screen, i cannot
> input anything: the keyboard seems to be dead. Then i have to reboot
> freebsd and the problem disappear !
Is this an AT or USB keyboard?
If it is a USB key
0 0/0x1 (20100331/tbfadt-655)
Sincerely!
-
e^(π⋅i) + 1 = 0
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/How-to-fix-the-%22keyboard-dead%22-question---tp29734114p29734114.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at N
2seconds spent Googling the phrase pulls up my much more polite answer to
exactly the same question from a month ago.
Absolutely no effort was made, that much is OBVIOUS.
In my defense when I realised the the OP thought that this was a Juniper
support list I did offer to try help
r.com/mikelking
On Sep 10, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ross Cameron
wrote:
It's not the first time that almost word for word the same question
has
been
asked by someone from that domain.
True but juniper has given a great of
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 08:58:46PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
> It's not the first time that almost word for word the same question has been
> asked by someone from that domain.
>
And not the first time some idiot rude reply caused much
more harm than good.
jerry
>
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Ross Cameron wrote:
> It's not the first time that almost word for word the same question has
> been
> asked by someone from that domain.
>
True but juniper has given a great of IP to BSD. Gracefully handling some
runoff seems appropriate
On Sep 10, 2010, at 7:23 PM, Ross Cameron wrote:
> As an !!! employee !!! of Juniper I would expect that you would know that
> the "res" command is part of the JunOS shell and NOT part of the underlying
> FreeBSD OS.
>
> Most especially since you're "helping" what sounds like a member of the
> p
It's not the first time that almost word for word the same question has been
asked by someone from that domain.
"Opportunity is most often missed by people because it is dressed in
overalls and looks like work."
Thomas Alva Edison
Inventor of 1093 patents, includi
As an !!! employee !!! of Juniper I would expect that you would know that
the "res" command is part of the JunOS shell and NOT part of the underlying
FreeBSD OS.
Most especially since you're "helping" what sounds like a member of the
press, therefore you SHOULD have / SOME / idea of what you are d
Joanne,
I did a quick which and search of the ports that yielded nothing
concrete regarding this command. I believe that this a proprietary
Juniper utility. I found similar reference to this at this url:
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?23,124019,124019
As much as I hate p
I'm helping a new writer use tech pubs lab routers. In trying to use the res
utility, he gets the following:
-bash-2.05b$ res show tp5
-bash: res: command not found
In giving the uname -a command he gets:
-bash-2.05b$ uname -a
FreeBSD bigpink.juniper.net 4.10-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p2
--- On Thu, 9/9/10, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> From: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Subject: freebsd-update question
> To: questi...@freebsd.org
> Date: Thursday, September 9, 2010, 1:40 PM
> Hi,
>
> I'm reading
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/book
On 09/09/2010 19:40:19, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> I'm reading
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html
> in preparation for an update of a 6.2-RELEASE machine in a colocation
> faciilty. However, that page says 6.3 or later is needed to
Hi,
I'm reading
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html
in preparation for an update of a 6.2-RELEASE machine in a colocation
faciilty. However, that page says 6.3 or later is needed to do it via the
freebsd-update(8) mechanism.
Are t
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 325, Issue 5, Message: 4
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:06:33 +0100 Paul Macdonald wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for posting on a bsd list but i figure there's more than a few
> sendmail experts here.
>
> I would like to run reverse dns checks on one of my boxes but the
On 8/27/2010 9:14 PM, Michael J. Kearney wrote:
Will natd forward rtmp:// ???
I am sure libalias and natd know nothing about rtmp.
freebsd# cat /etc/natd.conf
use_sockets
redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.3:3389 10.1.10.172:3389
redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.2:1935 10.1.10.172:1935
redirect_port tc
On 8/27/2010 9:09 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 27 August 2010, at 05:07, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Le Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:17:19 -0700, Doug Hardie a
écrit :
PF's route_to will return the packets to the proper router, but I
have not been able to figure out which ones those would be. The
source
Will natd forward rtmp:// ???
freebsd# cat /etc/natd.conf
use_sockets
redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.3:3389 10.1.10.172:3389
redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.2:1935 10.1.10.172:1935
redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.2:8790 10.1.10.172:8790
redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.2:6000-6100 10.1.10.172:6000-6100
interfac
On 27 August 2010, at 05:07, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Le Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:17:19 -0700,
> Doug Hardie a écrit :
>
>> PF's route_to will return the packets to the proper router, but I have not
>> been able to figure out which ones those would be. The source IP
>> address can be any on eith
Le Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:17:19 -0700,
Doug Hardie a écrit :
> PF's route_to will return the packets to the proper router, but I have not
> been able to figure out which ones those would be. The source IP
> address can be any on either network and its highly likely that we
> will see packets from
I have several servers with one ethernet interface. Currently it is connected
via a WAN to the internet. We are in the midst of switching to a different
provider. I would like to be able to operate with both temporarily until all
the users/services get switched. The new circuit is in and wor
Hi,
Sorry for posting on a bsd list but i figure there's more than a few
sendmail experts here.
I would like to run reverse dns checks on one of my boxes but the
check_rnds macro looks a bit overkill to me.
I want to reject the mail if there's no reverse dns, but not if there is
rdns but
ight now I have 3 disks, but one of them has data on it. I'd like to
>>> setup a RaidZ but have a question on how to do this:
>>> Basically, I need to setup a mirror with the two empty drives, copy the
>>> data over and then add the third. Is that even possible
On 16/08/2010 8:56 AM, Depo Catcher wrote:
Hi, I'm building a new file server. Right now I'm on FreeBSD 6.4/UFS2 and
going to go to 8.1 with ZFS.
Right now I have 3 disks, but one of them has data on it. I'd like to setup
a RaidZ but have a question on how to do this:
Basic
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Depo Catcher wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm building a new file server. Right now I'm on FreeBSD 6.4/UFS2 and
> going to go to 8.1 with ZFS.
>
in a few weeks, ZFS v15 will be MFC'd to RELENG_8 this is a much more
mature and stable ZFS
I would suggest that you run RELENG_8 af
Hi, I'm building a new file server. Right now I'm on FreeBSD 6.4/UFS2
and going to go to 8.1 with ZFS.
Right now I have 3 disks, but one of them has data on it. I'd like to
setup a RaidZ but have a question on how to do this:
Basically, I need to setup a mirror with the t
Just going to reply to this one bit for now: The computer used to be a gaming
computer, converted this past fall into a file server when I lacked time to
play any games in a year.
>> Additionally I spent $34 on a video card today that reduces my power
>> consumption by 150Watts, resulting in a
On 14.08.2010 22:16, Chris Maness wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Mikhail wrote:
On 14.08.2010 21:58, Chris Maness wrote:
Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change recognition modes
Here[1] you can find pretty good explanation.
Be well.
[1] - http://marc.info/?l=pine-
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Mikhail wrote:
> On 14.08.2010 21:58, Chris Maness wrote:
>>
>> Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change recognition modes
>
> Here[1] you can find pretty good explanation.
>
> Be well.
>
> [1] - http://marc.info/?l=pine-info&m=96822028906940&w=2
> ___
On 14.08.2010 21:58, Chris Maness wrote:
Unable to process From lines (envelopes), change recognition modes
Here[1] you can find pretty good explanation.
Be well.
[1] - http://marc.info/?l=pine-info&m=96822028906940&w=2
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd
What would cause this error?
einstein:~ chris$ telnet ns1 110
Trying *...
Connected to ns1.**.org.
Escape character is '^]'.
+OK QPOP (version 2.53) at ns1.*.org starting.
<30383.1281808...@ns1.**.org>
user luis
+OK Password required for luis.
pass **
-ERR Unable to process
ower outages here are usually spikes that
> kill my current web server (but amazingly *not* my file server). In
> fact, one of those power fluxes occurred last night. I love storms
> for the light shows, but hate them for the toll they take on my
> servers.
Indeed. Ryan, I'm
On Thu, August 12, 2010 8:14 pm, Al Plant wrote:
>> #3. Thats why setting the bios "not" to self boot would work. (Stopping
>> the bios from turning the server on after an outage.) Someone would have
>> to check the power status manually before throwing the switch manually
>> to make it come up aft
Ryan Coleman wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Al Plant wrote:
David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, August 11, 2010 1:18 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:06 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, August 11, 2010 12:25 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
He thinks that at 500W needed it would give
Indeed you are right. I installed xinit from ports but something didn't
happen as it should have. I tried again using pkg_add as you suggested
and startx does exist now.
I installed olvwm several days ago and it did not pull in the xorg stuff
also.
Thanks for the help!
Best regards,
Fred
Samu
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Chris Hill wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Fred Boatwright wrote:
[snip]
I installed x11-servers/xorg-server but maybe should have installed Xorg
instead. However, from looking at the pkg-descr for xorg it looks like it
will install a huge amount of software that will not ge
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Fred Boatwright wrote:
[snip]
I installed x11-servers/xorg-server but maybe should have installed Xorg
instead. However, from looking at the pkg-descr for xorg it looks like
it will install a huge amount of software that will not get used. I am
reluctant to do this. I
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Fred Boatwright wrote:
> pkg_info | grep xinit doesn't return anything
>
then, you doesn't have installed xinit, and startx can't be here
pkg_add -rv xinit
and then, if it doesn't fail, try again:
rehash
which startx
> rehash
> which startx
> startx: Command no
pkg_info | grep xinit doesn't return anything
rehash
which startx
startx: Command not found
whereis X
X: /usr/local/bin/X
pkg_which /usr/local/bin/X
pkg_which: Command not found
Oliver: I used your porgle tool to find pkg_which and will install it
later. Porgle appears to be a very useful too
Fred,
From man startx(1):
SEE ALSO
xinit(1), X(7), Xserver(1), Xorg(1), xorg.conf(5)
Try:
# whereis X
If X is installed, it should return:
# X: /usr/local/bin/X
pkg_which if X is installed should return:
# pkg_which /usr/local/bin/X
xorg-server-1.7.5,1
If it doesn't, then the full
pkg_info | grep xinit
rehash (if using some *csh)
which startx
?
Samuel Martín Moro
{EPITECH.} tek4
CamTrace S.A.S
(+033) 1 41 38 37 60
1 Allée de la Venelle
92150 Suresnes
FRANCE
"Nobody wants to say how this works.
Maybe nobody knows ..."
Xorg.conf(5)
On Thu, A
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:49 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
>
> On Aug 12, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
>> Yes. The downside comes from when the BIOS is told to turn on the server at,
>> say, 10pm and the power is still out... it starts the process and runs out
>> of battery mid-way through t
Hi Oliver and Tim,
I installed xinit but startx still doesn't exist. whereis returns
nothing and man startx returns nothing.
Fred
Tim Kellers wrote:
>
> /usr/ports/x11/xinit
>
> On my system (with X, obviously, already installed):
>
> beta# whereis startx
>
> startx: /usr/local/bin/startx /
On Aug 12, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
Yes. The downside comes from when the BIOS is told to turn on the
server at, say, 10pm and the power is still out... it starts the
process and runs out of battery mid-way through the boot before it
gets the chance to load the UPS controller.
On Aug 12, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Al Plant wrote:
> David Brodbeck wrote:
>> On Wed, August 11, 2010 1:18 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
>>> On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:06 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
>>>
On Wed, August 11, 2010 12:25 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> He thinks that at 500W needed it would give me
/usr/ports/x11/xinit
On my system (with X, obviously, already installed):
beta# whereis startx
startx: /usr/local/bin/startx /usr/local/man/man1/startx.1.gz
beta# pkg_which /usr/local/bin/startx
xinit-1.2.0
beta# whereis xinit
xinit: /usr/local/bin/xinit /usr/local/man/man1/xinit.1.gz
/us
David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, August 11, 2010 1:18 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:06 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, August 11, 2010 12:25 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
He thinks that at 500W needed it would give me about 12 minutes on a
1400VA. My consideration is, then, give the
Fred Boatwright wrote:
> Where would I find startx? I assume it is part one of the ports
> under X11 but I don't want to install all of them to find it.
It's in x11/xinit. You can use "porgle" to find out:
http://www.secnetix.de/tools/porgle/porgle.py?w=p&q=startx
It has four hits, but it's
Hello,
Where would I find startx? I assume it is part one of the ports under
X11
but I don't want to install all of them to find it.
Also, is p5-Tk the same as Perl/Tk?
Best regards,
Fred
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Ryan Coleman wrote:
> > He thinks that at 500W needed it would give me about 12 minutes on
> > a 1400VA.
>
> That W and VA numbers of the UPS are pretty much irrelevant,
> because they tell nothing about the capacity of the battery.
> Those numbers only give an upper lim
On Aug 11, 2010, at 6:01 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Wed, August 11, 2010 1:18 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
>> On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:06 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, August 11, 2010 12:25 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
He thinks that at 500W needed it would give me about 12 minutes on a
>
On Wed, August 11, 2010 1:18 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:06 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
>
>> On Wed, August 11, 2010 12:25 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
>>> He thinks that at 500W needed it would give me about 12 minutes on a
>>> 1400VA. My consideration is, then, give the server 2 minu
Ryan Coleman wrote:
> He thinks that at 500W needed it would give me about 12 minutes on
> a 1400VA.
That W and VA numbers of the UPS are pretty much irrelevant,
because they tell nothing about the capacity of the battery.
Those numbers only give an upper limit on the power that
the UPS can han
On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:06 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Wed, August 11, 2010 12:25 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
>> He thinks that at 500W needed it would give me about 12 minutes on a
>> 1400VA. My consideration is, then, give the server 2 minutes on battery.
>> If full power has not been returned, shu
On Wed, August 11, 2010 12:25 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> He thinks that at 500W needed it would give me about 12 minutes on a
> 1400VA. My consideration is, then, give the server 2 minutes on battery.
> If full power has not been returned, shut down the server but leave the
> modem (w/ wireless) and
Thanks, Chuck.
I talked with a former colleague that has a lot of experience in specing out
UPS requirements (between battery-ready and generator-ready backups at the
office they have up to 5 minutes of battery backup before the gas generator is
needed with a 128-hour recharge time just to supp
Hi, Ryan--
On Aug 11, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> Total: 495W
>
> According to a calculator if I enter all that information:
> http://www.csgnetwork.com/upssizecalc.html
> It says that it will use 693VA.
That sounds reasonable. The better PSUs have "80 Plus" certification for
effic
I know that APC's website states this load on this unit results in this runtime.
However I do not trust these figures, typically, when coming from smaller
manufacturers than APC.
I am looking at a 1400VA / 980W UPS to run a single server with a usually not
on monitor, a DSL modem and a simple s
ry to
troubleshoot?
ZFS. No question about it. Thank you for this eye opener. ;-)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 9/08/2010 2:52 AM, krad wrote:
On 8 August 2010 16:51, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Yes. It works very well.
On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out of the box (so to
speak) which will
On 8 August 2010 16:51, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
>
> > On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >
> >> Yes. It works very well.
> >> On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out of the box (so to
> >> speak) which will work fine for
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> Yes. It works very well.
>> On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out of the box (so to
>> speak) which will work fine for most purposes.
>>
> One other thing comes to mind. I want a v
On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Yes. It works very well.
On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out of the box (so to
speak) which will work fine for most purposes.
One other thing comes to mind. I want a very robus, fast rockl solid
*server*
It will be a file- email and webser
On 8-8-2010 14:27, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Yes. It works very well.
On amd64 you'll get a pretty reasonable setup out of the box (so to
speak) which will work fine for most purposes. Of course, if your
system has particularly demanding IO patterns, then you may have to
tweak some loader.conf or s
On Sunday 08 of August 2010 14:43:48 Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> Years back I ran FreeBSD, so I have some experience. The last couple
> of years I ran Solaris, followed by Opensolaris. I am very satisfied.
> However, considering the troubles after Oracle took over I have rebuild
> my server system u
ack of support in sysinstall, I can't see any good reasons to avoid
> it. However, it's your system, and booting from UFS also works very
> well, so do whatever pleases you.
>
> There's more of a question over whether it's a good idea to put swap
> onto zfs --
Hmmm... well, booting FreeBSD off ZFS works perfectly well. Apart from
the lack of support in sysinstall, I can't see any good reasons to avoid
it. However, it's your system, and booting from UFS also works very
well, so do whatever pleases you.
There's more of a question over whet
Years back I ran FreeBSD, so I have some experience. The last couple
of years I ran Solaris, followed by Opensolaris. I am very satisfied.
However, considering the troubles after Oracle took over I have rebuild
my server system under FreeBSD-8.1 (now running as a virtual machine
under VirtualB
On 1 August 2010, at 03:42, RW wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 01:12:27 -0700
> Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>> I have a question about what I am seeing on several servers. These
>> are 4 core machines with more than the needed memory. Load is never
>> above .5 and memory u
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 01:12:27 -0700
Doug Hardie wrote:
> I have a question about what I am seeing on several servers. These
> are 4 core machines with more than the needed memory. Load is never
> above .5 and memory usually shows over half free. I have never seen
> it even close
I have a question about what I am seeing on several servers. These are 4 core
machines with more than the needed memory. Load is never above .5 and memory
usually shows over half free. I have never seen it even close to the limit
(including buffers). Basically these are lightly used servers
> send everything from any facility.level to the loghost EXCEPT things from
> $program that's level .info or lower. (so anything that's from
> $program.notice
*.notice @loghost
If your program logs to a give facility, for example your program logs
to local7:
local7.notice @loghost
anything u
Hi,
I've set up remote syslog, and want to have a program specification that will
send some messages to the remote server. Right now, I've got the usual 'send
everything to the loghost' in syslog.conf:
*.*@loghost
and what I want to do is:
send everything from any facility.level t
On Friday 16 July 2010 20:58:31 Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 16/07/2010 18:22:04, Mario Lobo wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > System: 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Jun 11 09:41:37 BRT
> > 2010 i386
> >
> > The question is about how pf acts on an specifi
801 - 900 of 9364 matches
Mail list logo
