Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2007, at 2:33 PM, RW wrote:
>> If this box is not the gateway, there is no point in doing anything
>> about this because they can simply turn-off proxying and go direct to
>> the internet.
>
> However, on your gateway you can specify that only the proxy box is
>
On Jul 6, 2007, at 2:33 PM, RW wrote:
If this box is not the gateway, there is no point in doing anything
about this because they can simply turn-off proxying and go direct to
the internet.
However, on your gateway you can specify that only the proxy box is
allowed to connect to the web. Tha
RW wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:20:07 +0200
> Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I do not yet have FreeBSD functioning as a real gateway as I will be
>> able to do it at a later stage. However, there is one thing that
>> leaves me wondering. In order to use the content filtering as
RW wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:47:43 +0200
> Peter Boosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> RW wrote:
>>> On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:26:36 +0200
>>> Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
Great! Thank you so much! Now this should really speed me up nd it
is perfect solution as
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:47:43 +0200
Peter Boosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RW wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:26:36 +0200
> > Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Great! Thank you so much! Now this should really speed me up nd it
> >> is perfect solution as no client conf
RW wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:26:36 +0200
> Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Great! Thank you so much! Now this should really speed me up nd it is
>> perfect solution as no client configuration is needed and no escaping
>> possible! Thanks again!
>
>
> Unless they reconfig
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 18:26:36 +0200
Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great! Thank you so much! Now this should really speed me up nd it is
> perfect solution as no client configuration is needed and no escaping
> possible! Thanks again!
Unless they reconfigure their browser to use on
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:20:07 +0200
Zbigniew Szalbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not yet have FreeBSD functioning as a real gateway as I will be
> able to do it at a later stage. However, there is one thing that
> leaves me wondering. In order to use the content filtering as
> provided by Dans
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 17:20:50 +0100, Daniel Bye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> You can use pf's redirection to catch all outbound traffic destined for
> port 80:
>
> rdr on $int_if inet proto tcp from $internal_net to ! port www ->
> $proxy_host port $proxy_port
>
> Define the macros a
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
> hi,
>
> Thank you all for your comments re FreeBSD as a parental control and
> gateway server. I have both squid and dansguardian working and I am left
> with configuring them to optimize web browsing and the desired level of
> control.
>
> I do not yet have FreeBSD func
Hello,
>>>Now, if someone just changes the port in their browser to 3128 (squid
> proxy port), then all content filtering will be bypassed.
>
> I have the same setup at home for my kids.
>
> Check the /etc/ipnat.conf file to redirect all web traffic to your
> FreeBSD_gateway_IP_address:8080 (ass
>>Now, if someone just changes the port in their browser to 3128 (squid
proxy port), then all content filtering will be bypassed.
I have the same setup at home for my kids.
Check the /etc/ipnat.conf file to redirect all web traffic to your
FreeBSD_gateway_IP_address:8080 (assuming your FreeBSD bo
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
> hi,
>
> Thank you all for your comments re FreeBSD as a parental control and
> gateway server. I have both squid and dansguardian working and I am left
> with configuring them to optimize web browsing and the desired level of
> control.
>
> I do not yet have FreeBSD fun
13 matches
Mail list logo
