Re: smtp pull

2005-01-12 Thread Brian Clapper
On 12 January, 2005, at 14:54 (-0500) Kris Maglione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Maybe fetchmail is what you need? That is what most of dialup users use > >when they run their own MTA servers. > > > > > > > Fetchmail uses POP. It'll do more than just POP. From the man page: AU

Re: smtp pull

2005-01-12 Thread Kris Maglione
Maybe fetchmail is what you need? That is what most of dialup users use when they run their own MTA servers. Fetchmail uses POP. Obviously I can make smtp1 drop the mail in a mailbox on smtp1 and then get smtp2 to imap or pop the mail out however I'm looking for something that's fast and p

re: smtp pull

2005-01-11 Thread stheg olloydson
it was said: Hi, Looking for some thoughts on the following scenario. firewall smtp2 | | smtp1 smtp1 is on the DMZ. So smtp1 is the first point of call for incoming mail. Mail ultimately has to end up on smtp2 however I do not want smtp1 to simply forward the mail to smtp2 as I'll have to

Re: smtp pull

2005-01-11 Thread Chuck Swiger
Andrew Thomson wrote: [ ... ] smtp1 is on the DMZ. So smtp1 is the first point of call for incoming mail. Mail ultimately has to end up on smtp2 however I do not want smtp1 to simply forward the mail to smtp2 as I'll have to explicitly allow the setup of port 25 through the firewall to smtp2. I wou

RE: smtp pull

2005-01-11 Thread Haulmark, Chris
Someone broke the silence: > Hi, > > Looking for some thoughts on the following scenario. > > firewall smtp2 >> >> > smtp1 > > smtp1 is on the DMZ. So smtp1 is the first point of call for incoming > mail. Mail ultimately has to end up on smtp2 however I do not > want smtp1 > to simply f