People,
I'd like input on which web stat suite to use. Hopefully
something that I can use by simply pointing at my /vay/log/httpd*
file; it will magically create a graph of <>.
thanks for your insights!
gary
--
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTEC
> I'm finished the config section; but now am pointing lynx
> at the html docs. This is probably a case where I need to
> be patient and RTFM. --Or really, print out the docs and
> go in a quiet corner since reading online gives me problems.
>
> One thing you can he
On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 14:33 -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> I'd like input on which web stat suite to use. Hopefully
> something that I can use by simply pointing at my /vay/log/httpd*
> file; it will magically create a graph of <>.
port: www/awstats
http://awstats.sourceforge.net
Provides nice pret
* Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-02 14:43]:
>
> People,
>
> I'd like input on which web stat suite to use. Hopefully
> something that I can use by simply pointing at my /vay/log/httpd*
> file; it will magically create a graph of <>.
>
> thanks for your ins
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 02:33:19PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> I'd like input on which web stat suite to use. Hopefully
> something that I can use by simply pointing at my /vay/log/httpd*
> file; it will magically create a graph of <>.
http://www.mrunix.net/webalizer/ or
http://
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 02:10:19PM +0200, Toni Schmidbauer wrote:
> On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 02:33:19PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> > I'd like input on which web stat suite to use. Hopefully
> > something that I can use by simply pointing at my /vay/log/httpd*
> > file; it will magically
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 02:25, Gary Kline wrote:
> To the list,
>
> I think I have tried all that you guys have mentioned.
> The only one that just-worked out of the box was
> webalizer. (it's been awhile... ) awstats was a bear;
> and analog was a bear++.
>
>
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 05:03:39PM +0930, Wayne Sierke wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 02:25, Gary Kline wrote:
> > To the list,
> >
> > I think I have tried all that you guys have mentioned.
> > The only one that just-worked out of the box was
> > webalizer. (it's been awhile... )
