routing for 1000 users and 10Mbit internet.

2004-05-31 Thread hugle
Hello all. I run into some problem here Let's take, that I have 10mbit internet and 1000 users behind the router. All I want to do is to NAT internet over all of these users give some users external IPs (BIMAP in ipfilter) And olso do traffic shaping, like: Some IP groups (10.0.0.0/24) one pipe -

Re: routing for 1000 users and 10Mbit internet.

2004-05-31 Thread Fernando Gleiser
On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote: > The question in what machine do i need? > What CPU and how much of ram ? I set up a firewall for more than 300 users, a DMZ with a public webserver, webmail and MX on a PII-350MHz with 128 MB RAM. On another client, I set up a firewall for 50 users with a Pent

Re: routing for 1000 users and 10Mbit internet.

2004-05-31 Thread Bill Moran
hugle wrote: FG> On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote: The question in what machine do i need? What CPU and how much of ram ? FG> I set up a firewall for more than 300 users, a DMZ with a public webserver, FG> webmail and MX on a PII-350MHz with 128 MB RAM. dammit.. why then my users eats so much CPU?

Re: routing for 1000 users and 10Mbit internet.

2004-05-31 Thread Chuck Swiger
hugle wrote: [ ... ] why then my users eats so much CPU? look: CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 38.0% interrupt, 61.2% idle Mem: 21M Active, 177M Inact, 133M Wired, 1228K Cache, 199M Buf, 1677M Free I have only 61% idle ? usualy i have ~50 idle.. now I have P4 2.4GHZ maybe my setup

Re: routing for 1000 users and 10Mbit internet.

2004-05-31 Thread Bill Moran
hugle wrote: FG> On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote: dammit.. why then my users eats so much CPU? look: CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 38.0% interrupt, 61.2% idle Mem: 21M Active, 177M Inact, 133M Wired, 1228K Cache, 199M Buf, 1677M Free I have only 61% idle ? usualy i have ~50 idl

Re: routing for 1000 users and 10Mbit internet.

2004-06-01 Thread Bill Moran
hugle wrote: BM> hugle wrote: FG> On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote: dammit.. why then my users eats so much CPU? look: CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 38.0% interrupt, 61.2% idle Mem: 21M Active, 177M Inact, 133M Wired, 1228K Cache, 199M Buf, 1677M Free I have only 61% idle ? usua

Re: routing for 1000 users and 10Mbit internet.

2004-06-01 Thread Bill Moran
hugle wrote: BM> hugle wrote: BM> hugle wrote: FG> On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote: dammit.. why then my users eats so much CPU? look: CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 38.0% interrupt, 61.2% idle Mem: 21M Active, 177M Inact, 133M Wired, 1228K Cache, 199M Buf, 1677M Free I have onl

Re[2]: routing for 1000 users and 10Mbit internet.

2004-05-31 Thread hugle
FG> On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote: >> The question in what machine do i need? >> What CPU and how much of ram ? FG> I set up a firewall for more than 300 users, a DMZ with a public webserver, FG> webmail and MX on a PII-350MHz with 128 MB RAM. dammit.. why then my users eats so much CPU? look:

Re[2]: routing for 1000 users and 10Mbit internet.

2004-05-31 Thread Fernando Gleiser
On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote: > dammit.. > why then my users eats so much CPU? > look: > CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 38.0% interrupt, 61.2% idle > Mem: 21M Active, 177M Inact, 133M Wired, 1228K Cache, 199M Buf, 1677M Free > > I have only 61% idle ? > usualy i have ~50 idl

Re[3]: routing for 1000 users and 10Mbit internet.

2004-05-31 Thread hugle
FG> On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote: >> dammit.. >> why then my users eats so much CPU? >> look: >> CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 38.0% interrupt, 61.2% idle >> Mem: 21M Active, 177M Inact, 133M Wired, 1228K Cache, 199M Buf, 1677M Free >> >> I have only 61% idle ? >> usualy i

Re[2]: routing for 1000 users and 10Mbit internet.

2004-06-01 Thread hugle
BM> hugle wrote: >> FG> On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote: >> dammit.. why then my users eats so much CPU? look: CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 38.0% interrupt, 61.2% idle Mem: 21M Active, 177M Inact, 133M Wired, 1228K Cache, 199M Buf, 1677M Free I ha

Re[2]: routing for 1000 users and 10Mbit internet.

2004-06-01 Thread hugle
BM> hugle wrote: >> BM> hugle wrote: >> FG> On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote: >>dammit.. >>why then my users eats so much CPU? >>look: >>CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 38.0% interrupt, 61.2% idle >>Mem: 21M Active, 177M Inact, 133M Wired, 1228K Cache

Re[2]: routing for 1000 users and 10Mbit internet.

2004-06-01 Thread hugle
BM> hugle wrote: >> BM> hugle wrote: >> BM> hugle wrote: >>FG> On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote: >> dammit.. why then my users eats so much CPU? look: CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 38.0% interrupt, 61.2% idle Mem:

Re[2]: routing for 1000 users and 10Mbit internet.

2004-06-03 Thread hugle
BM> hugle wrote: >> BM> hugle wrote: >> BM> hugle wrote: >>FG> On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote: >> dammit.. why then my users eats so much CPU? look: CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 38.0% interrupt, 61.2% idle Mem:

Re: Re[2]: routing for 1000 users and 10Mbit internet.

2004-06-03 Thread Bill Moran
hugle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> now the main problem is.. that machine is shaping internet, right? > >> I did shaping for my subnet, so users in /24 have 100kbits everybody. > >> But they don't get such speed, they get about 70-80kbps . and if I > >> try to skipt pipe rules for certain IPs,