Securelevel 2 VS OpenNTPd

2005-06-04 Thread Kövesdán Gábor
Hello, I'm about to use ntpd to synchronise my server's clock to a time server and also provide time server, but I use securelevel 2 that denies to change the system time with a step greater than 1s. So, I'm afraid it could work with securelevel 2. Is there any method to get them work

Re: Securelevel 2 VS OpenNTPd

2005-06-04 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 08:08:04PM +0200, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: Hello, I'm about to use ntpd to synchronise my server's clock to a time server and also provide time server, but I use securelevel 2 that denies to change the system time with a step greater than 1s. So, I'm afraid it could

fsck in securelevel 2?

2005-04-24 Thread Kövesdán Gábor
Hi, I tried to check the root partition with fsck and it found errors and for my greatest surprise, it answered its questions automatically with no. It is due to the securelevel 2? I've been thinking whether fsck uses direct access (which is denied by the securelevel) or not? Cheers, Gábor

Re: fsck in securelevel 2?

2005-04-24 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 03:49:27PM +0200, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: Hi, I tried to check the root partition with fsck and it found errors and for my greatest surprise, it answered its questions automatically with no. It is due to the securelevel 2? I've been thinking whether fsck uses direct

Re: fsck in securelevel 2?

2005-04-24 Thread James Alexander Cook
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 03:49:27PM +0200, K?vesd?n G?bor wrote: Hi, I tried to check the root partition with fsck and it found errors and for my greatest surprise, it answered its questions automatically with no. It is due to the securelevel 2? I've been thinking whether fsck uses direct

securelevel 2

2004-11-25 Thread J.D. Bronson
I want to make sure that this is the case... When I am in kernel secure level '2' - I cannot even mount a partiton on the second disk? # mount /dev/da1s1d /mnt Operation not permitted I need to be able to mount partitions at times using my 2nd hard drive in the system...but unless I mount them at

Re: securelevel 2

2004-11-25 Thread Joshua Lokken
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:39:48 -0600, J.D. Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to make sure that this is the case... When I am in kernel secure level '2' - I cannot even mount a partiton on the second disk? Is this expected? I think so... [from man securelevel, or man init(8)] 2