Re: security.jail.sysvipc_allowed: implications ?

2004-11-23 Thread Andy Smith
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 03:23:02PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd like to know what are the implications of setting > security.jail.sysvipc_allowed=1 while using FreeBSD jails. If I understood > correctly, setting this to 1 allows processes inside the jail to > communicate to the host server

security.jail.sysvipc_allowed: implications ?

2004-11-22 Thread klr
Hi, I'd like to know what are the implications of setting security.jail.sysvipc_allowed=1 while using FreeBSD jails. If I understood correctly, setting this to 1 allows processes inside the jail to communicate to the host server/other jails using SysV shared memory, but I don't understand the full