Re: somewhat Off topic, Sendmail Issue

2011-10-12 Thread Dean E. Weimer
On 12.10.2011 15:16, Matthew Seaman wrote: _FFR_TLS_1 is actually already defined in the default sendmail on FreeBSD. See /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/Makefile around line 63. It's also enabled in the ports version of sendmail, so long as you select the WITH_TLS option. I just added this setting t

Re: somewhat Off topic, Sendmail Issue

2011-10-12 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 12/10/2011 20:36, Dean E. Weimer wrote: > Well after searching the comp.mail.sendmail list through Google groups, > I have come up wiht the following changes. > > I changed the orignal /etc/make.conf: > from this: > SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -D_FFR_SMTP_SSL > to: > SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -D_FFR_SMTP_SSL -D_

Re: somewhat Off topic, Sendmail Issue

2011-10-12 Thread Dean E. Weimer
On 12.10.2011 11:30, Daniel Feenberg wrote: There is an active Usenet group at comp.mail.sendmail. Does the ENCR parameter documented at http://www.sendmail.org/m4/starttls.html do you any good? It doesn't restrict the method, only the number of bits in the key. Daniel Feenberg Well afte

Re: somewhat Off topic, Sendmail Issue

2011-10-12 Thread Chuck Swiger
Hi-- On Oct 12, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Dean E. Weimer wrote: > I know that setting this option in Apache does the trick for HTTPS, I just > need to figure out how to tell Sendmail to do the same. > SSLCipherSuite ALL:!aNULL:!eNULL:!LOW:!EXP:!ADH:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:!SSLv2 > > If anyone has any idea

Re: somewhat Off topic, Sendmail Issue

2011-10-12 Thread Daniel Feenberg
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Dean E. Weimer wrote: I know this is a Sendmail issue, but I haven't been able to track down any information online, or found any Sendmail user email lists yet. And since I am running it on a FreeBSD server, I thought I would try here and see if anyone knows the a

somewhat Off topic, Sendmail Issue

2011-10-12 Thread Dean E. Weimer
I know this is a Sendmail issue, but I haven't been able to track down any information online, or found any Sendmail user email lists yet. And since I am running it on a FreeBSD server, I thought I would try here and see if anyone knows the answer to my problem. I have enabled SSL on SM

Re: sendmail issue

2005-02-10 Thread Emanuel Strobl
Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2005 06:04 schrieb saravanan ganapathy: > --- Emanuel Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2005 16:15 schrieb saravanan [...] > > > which is in /etc/rc.d/sendmail > > > > Sendmail is part of the FreeBSD base system. I don't > > know if the prot di

Re: sendmail issue

2005-02-09 Thread saravanan ganapathy
--- Emanuel Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2005 16:15 schrieb saravanan > ganapathy: > > Hai , > > > > I am using 5.3 release with updated all the ports. > > > > I am facing a problem with sendmail. > > > > # pkg_info | grep sendmail > > sendmail-8.13.3 Reliable,.

Re: sendmail issue

2005-02-09 Thread Emanuel Strobl
Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2005 16:15 schrieb saravanan ganapathy: > Hai , > > I am using 5.3 release with updated all the ports. > > I am facing a problem with sendmail. > > # pkg_info | grep sendmail > sendmail-8.13.3 Reliable, > # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sendmail.sh start > # netstat -an | grep

sendmail issue

2005-02-09 Thread saravanan ganapathy
Hai , I am using 5.3 release with updated all the ports. I am facing a problem with sendmail. # pkg_info | grep sendmail sendmail-8.13.3 Reliable, # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sendmail.sh start # netstat -an | grep 25 tcp60 0 *.25 *.* LISTEN tcp40 0 *.25 *.*

Re: sendmail issue

2003-03-24 Thread bastill
Quoting William Palfreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Extrafinally, how about we move this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've > added to the CC. Please don't! I am going away for a few days, and as I have to rely on webmail and a restricted ISP mail storage limit, I have temporarily unsubscribed from - quest

Re: sendmail issue

2003-03-24 Thread William Palfreman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think this is what you wanted to see. The time between issuing > "sendmail -bs" and the greeting being posted is so large (we are > talking several minutes here) that I thought it was not working at >

Re: Strange Sendmail issue. (appended domains)

2003-02-16 Thread Dragoncrest
Ok, I figured out what's up. Sendmail is only appending domains with bad DNS. So I'm fine. :) Sorry to bother everyone. At 09:23 AM 2/16/03 -0500, Dragoncrest wrote: Hi all. Only as of recently have I been getting this really weird sendmail issue and I can

Strange Sendmail issue. (appended domains)

2003-02-16 Thread Dragoncrest
Hi all. Only as of recently have I been getting this really weird sendmail issue and I can't explain it. I recently tried to block several domains from sending mail to us using the access list, however instead of blocking them, sendmail still allowed the mail to go through and in