In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 447, Issue 1, Message: 13
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:48:12 +0100 Dh?nin Jean-Jacques
> 2012/12/23 Polytropon
> > #!/bin/sh
> >
> > cat foo.txt | while read LINE1
> > do
> > cat bar.txt | while read LINE2
> > do
> > if [ "$LINE1
2012/12/23 Polytropon
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> cat foo.txt | while read LINE1
> do
> cat bar.txt | while read LINE2
> do
> if [ "$LINE1" = "$LINE2" ]; then
> sw="1"
> echo "Current value of sw is : " $sw
>
2012/12/23 Polytropon
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:34:34 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > First, the lines with "read" have to be:
> >
> > cat /foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE1
> >
> > cat /foo/bar/foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE2
> >
> > Reason: $LINE1 and $LINE2 will be evaluated here, they are "em
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:57:02 +
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Hmmm I'd just like to draw your attention to the comm(1) program,
> which lets you find lines common to two files, or only in one or other
> of a pair of inputs, very easily. The only slight gotcha is that the
> input files have to b
On 23/12/2012 09:43, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:34:34 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
>> First, the lines with "read" have to be:
>>
>> cat /foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE1
>>
>> cat /foo/bar/foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE2
>>
>> Reason: $LINE1 and $LINE2 will be evaluated here, they
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:34:34 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> First, the lines with "read" have to be:
>
> cat /foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE1
>
> cat /foo/bar/foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE2
>
> Reason: $LINE1 and $LINE2 will be evaluated here, they are "empty
> string", causing "read" to thro
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 01:05:35 -0800 (PST), Jack Mc Lauren wrote:
> Hi all
> Please take a look at the script below wich I've wrote :
> 1- cat /foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE12- do3- cat /foo/bar/foo/bar.txt |
> while read $LINE24- do 5- if [ "$LINE1" = "$LINE2" ]; then6-
>
Hi all
Please take a look at the script below wich I've wrote :
1- cat /foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE12- do3- cat /foo/bar/foo/bar.txt |
while read $LINE24- do 5- if [ "$LINE1" = "$LINE2" ]; then6-
sw="1"7- echo "Current value of sw is : " $sw8-
On 01/07/2012 04:30 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 07/01/2012 13:57, RW wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 15:37:49 +0200
Kaya Saman wrote:
n terms of paths this is what I'm doing: I'm in a FreeBSD jail
logged in by - #jexec tcsh
which gets me in as root. Crontab is being run as root so paths
should b
On 01/07/2012 03:57 PM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 15:37:49 +0200
Kaya Saman wrote:
n terms of paths this is what I'm doing: I'm in a FreeBSD jail
logged in by - #jexec tcsh
which gets me in as root. Crontab is being run as root so paths
should be the same no?
PATH is set at the top of /e
On 07/01/2012 13:57, RW wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 15:37:49 +0200
> Kaya Saman wrote:
>
> n terms of paths this is what I'm doing: I'm in a FreeBSD jail
>> logged in by - #jexec tcsh
>>
>> which gets me in as root. Crontab is being run as root so paths
>> should be the same no?
No -- you can't
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 15:37:49 +0200
Kaya Saman wrote:
n terms of paths this is what I'm doing: I'm in a FreeBSD jail
> logged in by - #jexec tcsh
>
> which gets me in as root. Crontab is being run as root so paths
> should be the same no?
PATH is set at the top of /etc/crontab
__
On 01/07/2012 03:22 PM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:21:51 +0200
Kaya Saman wrote:
The strange thing is that if I run this script manually
/root/java_restart/java_restart.sh it works fine and does what it's
supposed to do.
The commonest reason for scripts that that work from a terminal
fail
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:21:51 +0200
Kaya Saman wrote:
> The strange thing is that if I run this script manually
> /root/java_restart/java_restart.sh it works fine and does what it's
> supposed to do.
The commonest reason for scripts that that work from a terminal
failing under cron is that the e
On 01/07/2012 03:05 PM, Yuri Pankov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 02:21:51PM +0200, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi,
I wrote a shell script to detect if the port of tomcat was in use or not
then restart if the port wasn't online; due to tomcat segfaulting as my
system hasn't got enough mem
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 02:21:51PM +0200, Kaya Saman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a shell script to detect if the port of tomcat was in use or not
> then restart if the port wasn't online; due to tomcat segfaulting as my
> system hasn't got enough memory for it.
>
&
Hi,
I wrote a shell script to detect if the port of tomcat was in use or not
then restart if the port wasn't online; due to tomcat segfaulting as my
system hasn't got enough memory for it.
This is the shell script:
#!/usr/local/bin/bash
ntstat=`netstat -ap tcp | grep 8180 |
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 12:32 +, RW wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 09:44:57 -0700
> Devin Teske wrote:
>
>
> > At least two variations to the rule that { ... } is a block of
> > commands executed in the current shell are:
> >
> > 1. When the block appears as a function
>
> Is that correct?
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> [$(exit) exits the main shell environment]
This is a bug which is fixed in 9-current.
Another message:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
> > [all elements of multi-command pipelines are executed in a subshell]
> > You're learning that there are deviat
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 09:44:57 -0700
Devin Teske wrote:
> At least two variations to the rule that { ... } is a block of
> commands executed in the current shell are:
>
> 1. When the block appears as a function
Is that correct? I'd assumed that functions do execute in the current
shell since yo
in freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 354, Issue 10, Message: 4
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:15:26 -0400 Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> Here's another, but related, problem that I just ran into. The man page
> reads:
>
> Commands may be grouped by writing either
>(list)
> or
>
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>
> Here's another, but related, problem that I just ran into. The man page reads:
>
> Commands may be grouped by writing either
> (list)
> or
> { list; }
> The first form executes the commands in a subshell. N
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> ... these deviations should be noted in the man page to
> help eliminate such surprises. A single sentence would
> have sufficed in this case.
As always, I'm sure patches would be welcome :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mail
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>
> On Mar 19, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Andres Perera wrote:
> On Sun
On Mar 19, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Andres Perera wrote:
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
> If you ma
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Andres Perera wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
If you make the changes that I've suggested, you'll have consistent
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Andres Perera wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>>> If you make the changes that I've suggested, you'll have consistent
>>> execution. The reason you're having inconsistent behav
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Andres Perera wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>> If you make the changes that I've suggested, you'll have consistent
>> execution. The reason you're having inconsistent behavior is because Linux
>> has /bin/sh symbolically linked to
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
> If you make the changes that I've suggested, you'll have consistent
> execution. The reason you're having inconsistent behavior is because Linux
> has /bin/sh symbolically linked to /bin/bash while FreeBSD has a more
> traditional shell (we'
ash tries to overoptimize by running certain command substitutions
without a subshell
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I might be doing something dumb here, but this doesn't make sense to
> me. When I run the following script, I would expect to see no ou
On Mar 13, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I might be doing something dumb here, but this doesn't make sense to
> me. When I run the following script, I would expect to see no output:
>
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> exit_prog()
> {
> echo -n 'before'
> exit 0
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I might be doing something dumb here, but this doesn't make sense to
>> me. When I run the following script, I would expect to see no output:
>>
>>
>>
Hello everyone,
I might be doing something dumb here, but this doesn't make sense to
me. When I run the following script, I would expect to see no output:
#!/bin/sh
exit_prog()
{
echo -n 'before'
exit 0
echo -n 'after'
}
echo line 1: `exit_prog`
echo line 2:
echo li
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 14:45 -0600, Robert Bonomi wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:01:45 +0100
> > From: Frank Bonnet
> > Subject: problem with shell script
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > I'm in trouble with a simple shell script that give erroneous value
> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:01:45 +0100
> From: Frank Bonnet
> Subject: problem with shell script
>
> Hello
>
> I'm in trouble with a simple shell script that give erroneous value when
> running ...
>
> If I run commands interactively everything runs well
he number of outputed lines, using [p]grep and
wc makes two processes, while awk can do it all alone.
awk ftw!
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:17 PM, wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm in trouble with a simple shell script that give
> erroneous value when running ...
>
> If I run commands in
just use: pgrep "slapd"
On 01/12/2011 15:17, four.harris...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello
I'm in trouble with a simple shell script that give
erroneous value when running ...
If I run commands interactively everything runs well
> ps ax | grep slapd | grep -v grep | wc -l
Hello
I'm in trouble with a simple shell script that give
erroneous value when running ...
If I run commands interactively everything runs well
> ps ax | grep slapd | grep -v grep | wc -l
1
If I run in the following shell script :
#!/bin/sh
SD=0
SD=`ps -ax | grep slapd | grep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
|David Scheidt wrote:
|
|> ps ax | grep [s]lapd | wc -l
|>
|> The [] creates a one-character class that doesn't match the regex.
|
|Doesn't [s]lapd need to be quoted? [] are special to (at least some
David Scheidt wrote:
> ps ax | grep [s]lapd | wc -l
>
> The [] creates a one-character class that doesn't match the regex.
Doesn't [s]lapd need to be quoted? [] are special to (at least some)
shells.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 17:58:33 David Scheidt wrote:
>
> ps ax | grep [s]lapd | wc -l
>
> The [] creates a one-character class that doesn't match the regex. Easier
> to type and grep should be a bit faster.
And you can save another process by using
ps ax | grep -c '[s]lapd'
Although as o
(2011/01/12 23:01), Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
I'm in trouble with a simple shell script that give
erroneous value when running ...
If I run commands interactively everything runs well
> ps ax | grep slapd | grep -v grep | wc -l
1
If I run in the following shell script :
#!/bin
(2011/01/13 01:00), Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Samuel Mart?n Moro wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Chad Kellerman
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Frank Bonnet
wrote:
I'm in trouble with a simple shell script that give
erroneous value when running ...
Quoth Frank Bonnet on Wednesday, 12 January 2011:
> Hello
>
> I'm in trouble with a simple shell script that give
> erroneous value when running ...
>
> If I run commands interactively everything runs well
>
> > ps ax | grep slapd | grep -v grep | wc -l
>
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Samuel Mart?n Moro wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Chad Kellerman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
I'm in trouble with a simple shell script that give
erroneous value when running ...
If I run commands interactively everything
On Jan 12, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Samuel Martín Moro wrote:
> On W
>>
>>>> If I run in the following shell script :
>>>>
>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>> SD=0
>>>> SD=`ps -ax | grep slapd | grep -v grep | wc -l`
>>>> echo
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Samuel Martín Moro wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Chad Kellerman wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
>>
>> > Hello
>> >
>> > I'm in trouble with a simple
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Chad Kellerman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > I'm in trouble with a simple shell script that give
> > erroneous value when running ...
> >
> > If I run commands int
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm in trouble with a simple shell script that give
> erroneous value when running ...
>
> If I run commands interactively everything runs well
>
> > ps ax | grep slapd | grep -v grep | wc -l
>
Hello
I'm in trouble with a simple shell script that give
erroneous value when running ...
If I run commands interactively everything runs well
> ps ax | grep slapd | grep -v grep | wc -l
1
If I run in the following shell script :
#!/bin/sh
SD=0
SD=`ps -ax | grep slapd | grep
Paul Lambert wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Paul wrote:
> > > Thanks Oliver
> > > I can just get the i386 vmware version and should install and run.
> > > Last question is there a x86_64 bit Linux module?
> >
> > No, unfortunately x86_64 linux binaries are not supported.
> >
> > > I
Oliver,
I was well on my way of installing VMware-Player for i386 linux on FreeBSD
until I encountered these error messages.
Aug 8 20:44:09 BRSINC-VM02 kernel: linux: pid 12889 (dd): ioctl fd=0,
cmd=0x6d02 ('m',2) is not implemented
Aug 8 20:44:09 BRSINC-VM02 kernel: linux: pid 12896 (dd): ioct
Paul wrote:
> Thanks Oliver
> I can just get the i386 vmware version and should install and run.
> Last question is there a x86_64 bit Linux module?
No, unfortunately x86_64 linux binaries are not supported.
> Is one I'm development?
I'm afraid I don't know. I suggest you try asking in th
ime currently.
>
> Maybe someone else from the -questions list can jump in,
> because I don't have much experience with vmware (I prefer
> qemu or virtual box).
>
> Paul Lambert wrote:
>> Thanks for the reply. I am attaching the bash output from the shell
>> script.
e in the future.
>
> I previously had made the "stat" change to the shell script and that part
> works. But, the bash shell is reporting an 'od" error.
>
> Finally, how much performance do you lose with the linux module emulator?
Not much, probably none at
e and find exactly where the code is located,
> extract it and place it in the location where the shell script would place
> and see if it will run from there. This is a longshot but the fact is shell
> scripts automate what can be manually performed. But, using vi will be
> tedious. Gedit wil
.
However, I can open the file and find exactly where the code is located,
extract it and place it in the location where the shell script would place
and see if it will run from there. This is a longshot but the fact is shell
scripts automate what can be manually performed. But, using vi will be
support.
Paul
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Paul Lambert wrote:
> Oliver,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I am attaching the bash output from the shell
> script. This script implements RPMs so I am sure that I need the linux
> module. I had previously found a guide on how to install
Oliver,
Thanks for the reply. I am attaching the bash output from the shell
script. This script implements RPMs so I am sure that I need the linux
module. I had previously found a guide on how to install RPMs on FreeBSD.
I have a printer that has an RPM that allows it to work on Linus. So I
Redirected to the -questions.
Paul wrote:
> What about matching the ' marks in this section? I get a command error.
>
> > > # XXX: put extraction in its own function
> > > MAGIC_NUMBER=`od -An -t u4 -N 4 -j $MAGIC_OFFSET "$file" | tr -d ' '`
That command works fine for me:
$ MAGIC_OFF
in message <20100624192256.gf...@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com>,
wrote Chip Camden thusly...
>
> On Jun 24 08:39, Parv wrote:
> > in message <20100624183407.ga49...@holstein.holy.cow>,
> > wrote p...@pair.com thusly...
> > >
> > > # Matches a number, either positive (without '+' sign) or
> > >
p...@pair.com writes:
>> if expr "$arg" : "[1-9]*\.\{0,1\}[0-9]*$" > /dev/null
>
> That regex considers "." a number but not "0.9" (this one seems to
> be due to typo) nor a negative number.
I had been pointing out an error in the regular expression that
someone else had posted, but I obvious
On Jun 24 08:39, Parv wrote:
> in message <20100624183407.ga49...@holstein.holy.cow>,
> wrote p...@pair.com thusly...
> >
> > # Matches a number, either positive (without '+' sign) or
> > # negative, which is either a whole number; or a real number
> > # ending with decimal point, or a real numb
in message <20100624183407.ga49...@holstein.holy.cow>,
wrote p...@pair.com thusly...
>
> # Matches a number, either positive (without '+' sign) or
> # negative, which is either a whole number; or a real number
> # ending with decimal point, or a real number with or without
> # leading digits be
in message <87d3vgmj1s@cjlinux.localnet>,
wrote Carl Johnson thusly...
>
> Carl Johnson writes:
>
> > Carl Johnson writes:
> >
> >> vogelke+u...@pobox.com (Karl Vogel) writes:
> >>
> > On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:24:39 +0800,
> > Aiza said:
> >>>
> >>> A> Receiving a variable from the com
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:16:22AM -0400, b. f. wrote:
> >i'm wondering if there is a script that i could run my plaintext
> >files thru that would capitalize thef first letter of each
> >sentence [[ assuming the character wasn't already a cap!]]
> >
> >more and more, in recent years, i have posted
>i'm wondering if there is a script that i could run my plaintext
>files thru that would capitalize thef first letter of each
>sentence [[ assuming the character wasn't already a cap!]]
>
>more and more, in recent years, i have posted questions or
>written things that have been sloppily or casually
guys,
i'm wondering if there is a script that i could run my plaintext
files thru that would capitalize thef first letter of each
sentence [[ assuming the character wasn't already a cap!]]
more and more, in recent years, i have posted questions or
written things that have been sloppily or casual
>> "Barry Byrne" writes:
B> I think the simplest thing would be to write a little wrapper script
B> that calls your other script.
B>
B> #!/bin/sh
B> echo "Stating Daemon Now"
B> /path/to/mainscript &
You might be better off using daemon to make sure you're detached from
the controlling term
2009/6/6 Martin McCormick :
> This also works in Linux's /bin/sh which I believe is an alias
> for bash so occasionally little things work differently.
>
Usually is, but in some it's linked to dash.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh
Also, you should ONLY use POSIX-compatible commands/extensio
I really appreciate all the good suggestions I got from
everybody who responded.
"Barry Byrne" writes:
> I think the simplest thing would be to write a little wrapper script, that
> calls your other script.
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> echo "Stating Daemon Now"
> /path/to/mainscript &
This got me
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:02:00 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> . . . or use tmux instead of GNU Screen, if you like.
>
> I got the impression this question was about a script backgrounding
> itself, though -- possibly creating a daemon using bash.
Maybe using detach (from ports) is a solution. It let's
>> On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:02:00 -0600,
>> Chad Perrin said:
C> I got the impression this question was about a script backgrounding itself,
C> though -- possibly creating a daemon using bash.
Same here. This seems a bit slimy, but it works (assuming you don't
already have an environment va
=
#!/bin/bash
# This script will sleep
# 50 times for 1 second in
# the background
main()
{
for ((i=0 ; i<=50 ;i++))
do
sleep 1
let i++
done
}
main &
# EOF
==
--
Best regards,
Daniel
__
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 09:29:30AM -0700, Nerius Landys wrote:
> Just a thought, you can use the screen utility depending on what you
> are trying to do. For example if you want to start a job, long out of
> the machine completely, and then return to your job to see how it's
> running, you may cho
Just a thought, you can use the screen utility depending on what you
are trying to do. For example if you want to start a job, long out of
the machine completely, and then return to your job to see how it's
running, you may choose to run screen.
> screen bash
(Press Control-A then d)
(Logout from
>
> So, can I make a shell script background itself after
> starting?
>
> Right now, I remind my coworkers to append the & after the
> script name. the bg command expects a job number, not a process
> ID.
Martin,
If you mean you'd like to be able to put a scr
Martin McCormick wrote:
So, can I make a shell script background itself after
starting?
You could run all your code in a sub-shell:
#!/bin/sh
(
#your script here
) &
or in a shell function:
old_script()
{
#your script here
}
old_script $* &
Perhaps the se
I tried
bg $$
but $$ is the current process invoked just as $! is the process
of a backgrounded process started by that shell.
So, can I make a shell script background itself after
starting?
Right now, I remind my coworkers to append the & after the
script name. the bg command exp
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 07:42:56PM +0200, Stefan Miklosovic wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi Stefan,
>
>
> > If you don't fancy porting it yourself, I'd be happy to have a go at
> > porting it for you.
> >
> > I want to port a more complex piece of software to FreeBSD but I
> > wouldn't mind starting on a sim
Mel wrote:
On Monday 29 December 2008 13:35:06 Noah wrote:
Hi there,
I am trying to figure out the most accurate way to assess if an rsync
process is running and is established to the remote rsync server and is
transferring data. I am writing a bourne shell script to restart rsync
if the
On Monday 29 December 2008 13:35:06 Noah wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am trying to figure out the most accurate way to assess if an rsync
> process is running and is established to the remote rsync server and is
> transferring data. I am writing a bourne shell script to restart
Hi there,
I am trying to figure out the most accurate way to assess if an rsync
process is running and is established to the remote rsync server and is
transferring data. I am writing a bourne shell script to restart rsync
if the connection to the remote rsync server is lost.
The command &qu
On Sunday 02 November 2008 03:21:55 David Allen wrote:
> My apologies for asking on this list, but I'm stuck without Perl and need
> to use awk to generate a report.
>
> I'm working with a large data set spread across multiple files, but to
> keep things simple, say I have A Very Long String that c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Allen wrote:
> On 11/1/08, Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> David Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> My apologies for asking on this list, but I'm stuck without Perl and need
>>> to use awk to generate a report.
>>>
>>> I'm working
On 11/1/08, Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> My apologies for asking on this list, but I'm stuck without Perl and need
>> to use awk to generate a report.
>>
>> I'm working with a large data set spread across multiple files, but to
>> keep things
On 11/1/08, Gary Newcombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 18:21:55 -0700, "David Allen"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> My apologies for asking on this list, but I'm stuck without Perl and need
>> to use awk to generate a report.
>>
>> I'm working with a large data set spread acro
David Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My apologies for asking on this list, but I'm stuck without Perl and need
> to use awk to generate a report.
>
> I'm working with a large data set spread across multiple files, but to
> keep things simple, say I have A Very Long String that containing reco
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 20:17:54 -0800, "David Allen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/1/08, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 06:21:55PM -0700, David Allen wrote:
> >> My apologies for asking on this list, but I'm stuck without Perl and need
> >> to use awk to ge
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 18:21:55 -0700, "David Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My apologies for asking on this list, but I'm stuck without Perl and need
> to use awk to generate a report.
>
> I'm working with a large data set spread across multiple files, but to
> keep things simple, say I have A
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 08:17:54PM -0800, David Allen wrote:
> On 11/1/08, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 06:21:55PM -0700, David Allen wrote:
> >> My apologies for asking on this list, but I'm stuck without Perl and need
> >> to use awk to generate a report.
On 11/1/08, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 06:21:55PM -0700, David Allen wrote:
>> My apologies for asking on this list, but I'm stuck without Perl and need
>> to use awk to generate a report.
>>
>> I'm working with a large data set spread across multiple files
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 06:21:55PM -0700, David Allen wrote:
> My apologies for asking on this list, but I'm stuck without Perl and need
> to use awk to generate a report.
>
> I'm working with a large data set spread across multiple files, but to
> keep things simple, say I have A Very Long String
My apologies for asking on this list, but I'm stuck without Perl and need
to use awk to generate a report.
I'm working with a large data set spread across multiple files, but to
keep things simple, say I have A Very Long String that containing records,
each delimited by a single space. I need to
oami ; whoami )
Badly placed ()'s.
I could obviously write a shell script or something or do:
sudo whoami; sudo whoami
but is there a better way?
--
We're just a Bunch Of Regular Guys, a collective group that's trying
to understand and assimilate technology. We feel that
> How do I run multiple sudo commands at once? This fails
> because the semicolon ends the whole sudo command:
>
> > sudo whoami; whoami
> root
> user
>
> This confuses tcsh:
>
> monica:~> sudo ( whoami ; whoami )
> Badly placed ()'s.
Supposing sudo spawns a shell, something like
~> sudo whoami
How do I run multiple sudo commands at once? This fails because the
semicolon ends the whole sudo command:
> sudo whoami; whoami
root
user
This confuses tcsh:
monica:~> sudo ( whoami ; whoami )
Badly placed ()'s.
I could obviously write a shell script or something or do:
> sud
At 05:19 AM 8/23/2008, David Banning wrote:
I am running into a problem with the space character in filenames.
For instance, If I want to run the script;
for x in `ls`
do
echo $x
done
then filenames that have a space in them ie: "john smith.jpg"
are processed by my script as two names, "john"
Polytropon wrote:
Well, it's completely possible to create a file name like:
This is my *favourite* photo from "Cats" \ by Bob & Jane / my wife ~ 2008
`musical'.JPG
Um... actually you cannot create that as a filename on UFS. There are
precisely two characters you cannot use in a filename.
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:16:36 -0400, Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> spaces won't go away, and since they're legal in filenames, one may as
> well handle them.
Well, it's completely possible to create a file name like:
This is my *favourite* photo from "Cats" \ by Bob & Jane / my wife ~
1 - 100 of 354 matches
Mail list logo
