I'm looking for some suggestions as to why my spamassassin is so slow!
Installed from ports.
Details:
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55
5.0-RELEASE-p7
I'm running spamd and using spamc/procmail to pass the messages to
spamd.
I was reading the following,
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:08:37AM +1000, Andrew Thomson wrote:
I'm looking for some suggestions as to why my spamassassin is so slow!
Installed from ports.
Details:
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55
5.0-RELEASE-p7
I'm running spamd and using spamc/procmail to pass the messages to
spamd.
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:08:37AM +1000, Andrew Thomson wrote:
I've got a CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (930.32-MHz
686-class CPU) and I'm seeing performance like,
Jul 8 08:25:11 athomson spamd[52016]: clean message (0.4/5.0) for
ajt:1001 in 10.2 seconds, 2132 bytes.
Well,
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 09:22, Daniel Bye wrote:
Could be mx timeouts, DNS timeouts, rbl timeouts, dcc/razor/pyzor
timeouts...
In your global SpamAssassin config, try setting a value for timelog_path -
this will cause spamd to log what it's doing, and where it spent most time
doing it. Check
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 09:37, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:08:37AM +1000, Andrew Thomson wrote:
I've got a CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (930.32-MHz
686-class CPU) and I'm seeing performance like,
Jul 8 08:25:11 athomson spamd[52016]: clean message
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:57:14AM +1000, Andrew Thomson wrote:
we're back in business...
Jul 8 09:50:11 athomson spamd[52899]: clean message (0.4/5.0) for
ajt:1001 in 10.2 seconds, 3044 bytes.
Jul 8 09:50:28 athomson spamd[52912]: clean message (0.4/5.0) for
ajt:1001 in 10.3 seconds,
In the last episode (Jul 08), Daniel Bye said:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:57:14AM +1000, Andrew Thomson wrote:
we're back in business...
Jul 8 09:50:11 athomson spamd[52899]: clean message (0.4/5.0) for ajt:1001 in
10.2 seconds, 3044 bytes.
Jul 8 09:50:28 athomson spamd[52912]:
