On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 01:53:16AM +0200, Ghirai wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Does anyone know a faster way of extracting big rar files, or why is
> it so slow?
>
> I did a quick test with time (extracting the same ~800MiB file,
> consisting of split archives):
>
> unrar:
>
> real 4m29.637s
> user 0m4.9
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:27:02 -0800
Mel Flynn wrote:
> On Friday 20 March 2009 17:55:49 RW wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:53:16 +0200
> >
> > Ghirai wrote:
> > > The shareware WinRAR on windows seems to be better implemented
> > > (?), as it uses both cores to the fullest, and as such the time
do you have softdep enabled. if no, and the are lot of small files, it may
be this.
you said CPU load is low
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fre
On Friday 20 March 2009 17:55:49 RW wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:53:16 +0200
>
> Ghirai wrote:
> > The shareware WinRAR on windows seems to be better implemented (?), as
> > it uses both cores to the fullest, and as such the time needed to
> > extract stuff is a lot shorter.
>
> IIRC the unix v
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:53:16 +0200
Ghirai wrote:
> The shareware WinRAR on windows seems to be better implemented (?), as
> it uses both cores to the fullest, and as such the time needed to
> extract stuff is a lot shorter.
IIRC the unix version is portable C, but winrar has a lot of CPU
specifi
Hey,
Does anyone know a faster way of extracting big rar files, or why is
it so slow?
I did a quick test with time (extracting the same ~800MiB file,
consisting of split archives):
unrar:
real4m29.637s
user0m4.969s
sys 0m3.131s
7z:
real3m50.020s
user0m4.784s
sys 0m1.82
