tape record bigger than supplied buffer

2005-05-28 Thread Damian Sobieralski
tape record bigger than supplied buffer (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): 65536-byte tape record bigger than supplied buffer (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): 65536-byte tape record bigger than supplied buffer Realizing this means what it does at face value, was any data lost (should i take this as a "warning"

tape record bigger than supplied buffer

2005-05-30 Thread Damian Sobieralski
rk well in monitored tests. So last night I set up a job to run at night. When I came in this morning, all seemed to go well...the backup happened but I noticed 3 messages on the console: (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): 65536-byte tape record bigger than supplied buffer (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): 65536-byte tape record b

Re: tape record bigger than supplied buffer

2005-05-30 Thread Alex Zbyslaw
(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): 65536-byte tape record bigger than supplied buffer (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): 65536-byte tape record bigger than supplied buffer (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): 65536-byte tape record bigger than supplied buffer The backup seemed to go okay as I restored several files off of that tape with no pro

Re: tape record bigger than supplied buffer

2005-05-30 Thread Damian Sobieralski
> 1) Try restoring the whole tape to either an empty partition, or if > you don't have one of those, to /dev/null. /dev/null isn't > conclusive proof, but I assume that if data weas dropped then there > *should* be a failed checksum somewhere along the line. I'll do that tomorrow (restore the wh

Re: tape record bigger than supplied buffer

2005-05-31 Thread Alex Zbyslaw
Damian Sobieralski wrote: 2) See if you can't find some option to match the bacula record size to that of your tape drive. Dump, for example, has a -b option e.g. "-b 64" to set its record size. I'm puzzled by you only seeing three messages though. Why would three buffers be smaller and not t

Re: tape record bigger than supplied buffer

2005-06-13 Thread Damian Sobieralski
FYI: I added the following to my tape drive area in the bacula-sd-conf: Minimum Block Size = 64512 Maximum Block Size = 64512 I'm not seeing those errors any longer. I've restored and all seems to go well. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mai

Re: tape record bigger than supplied buffer

2005-06-14 Thread Alex Zbyslaw
Damian Sobieralski wrote: I added the following to my tape drive area in the bacula-sd-conf: Minimum Block Size = 64512 Maximum Block Size = 64512 I'm not seeing those errors any longer. I've restored and all seems to go well. Good stuff! Did that number come out of your tape drive manua

Re: tape record bigger than supplied buffer

2005-06-14 Thread Chuck Swiger
Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Damian Sobieralski wrote: I added the following to my tape drive area in the bacula-sd-conf: Minimum Block Size = 64512 Maximum Block Size = 64512 I'm not seeing those errors any longer. I've restored and all seems to go well. Good stuff! Did that number come out of yo

Re: tape record bigger than supplied buffer

2005-06-14 Thread Alex Zbyslaw
Chuck Swiger wrote: Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Damian Sobieralski wrote: I added the following to my tape drive area in the bacula-sd-conf: Minimum Block Size = 64512 Maximum Block Size = 64512 I'm not seeing those errors any longer. I've restored and all seems to go well. Good stuff! Did t