tcp blackhole and ident

2004-01-31 Thread J.D. Bronson
I have a question. I setup the following in sysctl.conf: net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2 net.inet.udp.blackhole=1 ..Well this works, but now I have a new issue. I run sendmail and as such, need to allow TCP 113 into this machine and yet get CONNECTION REFUSED. - I dont want to run IDENT, but need to stil

Re: tcp blackhole and ident

2004-01-31 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 07:32:36AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote: > I have a question. I setup the following in sysctl.conf: > > net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2 > net.inet.udp.blackhole=1 > > ..Well this works, but now I have a new issue. > I run sendmail and as such, need to allow TCP 113 into this machine

Re: tcp blackhole and ident

2004-01-31 Thread J.D. Bronson
At 07:39 AM 1/31/2004, Matthew Seaman wrote: On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 07:32:36AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote: > I have a question. I setup the following in sysctl.conf: > > net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2 > net.inet.udp.blackhole=1 > > ..Well this works, but now I have a new issue. > I run sendmail and as su

Re: tcp blackhole and ident

2004-01-31 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 07:46:39AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote: > At 07:39 AM 1/31/2004, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >Run ipfw(8) or a similar firewall and set up a rule that sends an ICMP > >reject whenever it detects an incoming connection on port 113 as part > >of your firewall configuration. Eg. so

Re: tcp blackhole and ident

2004-02-05 Thread Uwe Doering
J.D. Bronson wrote: At 07:39 AM 1/31/2004, Matthew Seaman wrote: On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 07:32:36AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote: > I have a question. I setup the following in sysctl.conf: > > net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2 > net.inet.udp.blackhole=1 > > ..Well this works, but now I have a new issue. > I r