On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:56:55AM -0400, Jim Stapleton wrote:
> that's libc, not glibc, the stuff I'm working on is specifically
> looking for a "glibc.so" file. Am I missing something?
>
> -Jim Stapleton
Somebody is missing something. The 'libc' files listed below *are*
glibc (at least libc.so
that's libc, not glibc, the stuff I'm working on is specifically
looking for a "glibc.so" file. Am I missing something?
-Jim Stapleton
On 6/19/06, Pablo Marín Ramón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked at a few of the emulator/linux* ports, and it was not in
> their pkg-plist files, only somet
> I looked at a few of the emulator/linux* ports, and it was not in
> their pkg-plist files, only something in their usr/sbin
> (glibc_post_upgrad), which, when ran, does not generate a glibc that I
> can find in the any of BSDs lib directories, or the compat/linux/lib,
> compat/linux/usr/lib eithe
I looked at a few of the emulator/linux* ports, and it was not in
their pkg-plist files, only something in their usr/sbin
(glibc_post_upgrad), which, when ran, does not generate a glibc that I
can find in the any of BSDs lib directories, or the compat/linux/lib,
compat/linux/usr/lib either.
Is th
