On 2006-12-28 20:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
Does the lang/gcc41 port work for you?
I don't know I don't care.
Ok, then.
I want to learn more about compilation processes, get to know
UNIX-like systems more, and whatever.
That's ok too. You are bound for a very
On 2006-12-27 23:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to compile the GCC 4.1.1 compiler.
Does the lang/gcc41 port work for you?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
Does the lang/gcc41 port work for you?
I don't know I don't care. I want to learn more about compilation
processes, get to know UNIX-like systems more, and whatever. So I've
downloaded the source for gcc, and the README says that I need the ISO
C90 compiler. Where
the ISO
C90 compiler. Where do I get that? OK it looks like I can compile gcc
4.1 with an older gcc, but that's not my choice.
[ But if that's the case, how was the first gcc compiled? xD ]
[ How was the first ever compiler compiled? xD ]
C90 is not a specific compiler, it's
for gcc, and the README says that I need the ISO
C90 compiler. Where do I get that? OK it looks like I can compile gcc
4.1 with an older gcc, but that's not my choice.
There is no such thing as *the* ISO C90 compiler, but, the gcc README almost
certainly says that you need *a* ISO C90 compiler
[Fistly, people wrote code in pure binary language. Then assembly were
invented and later they wrote higher level languages in assembly.]
With whatever C compiler the gcc developer had at that time.
It probably wasn't. The first ever compiler was most likely written
in assembler. Later on
Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
C90 is not a specific compiler, it's a standard, see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C90
AH OK THX. Back to a pre-compiled gcc.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Fistly, people wrote code in pure binary language. Then assembly were
invented and later they wrote higher level languages in assembly.]
With whatever C compiler the gcc developer had at that time.
It probably wasn't. The first ever compiler was most likely
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Fistly, people wrote code in pure binary language. Then assembly were
invented and later they wrote higher level languages in assembly.]
With whatever C compiler the gcc developer had at that time.
It probably wasn't. The first ever compiler was most likely
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
[Fistly, people wrote code in pure binary language. Then assembly
were invented and later they wrote higher level languages in assembly.]
With whatever C compiler the gcc developer had at that time.
It probably wasn't. The first ever compiler was most likely
Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
[Fistly, people wrote code in pure binary language. Then assembly
were invented and later they wrote higher level languages in assembly.]
With whatever C compiler the gcc developer had at that time.
It probably wasn't. The first ever
so, where? (also for linux?)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so, where? (also for linux?)
Can you not use gcc in pedantic mode?
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a
touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in
Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
so, where? (also for linux?)
The -std option of gcc is for setting the dialect, see this page:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.1/gcc/C-Dialect-Options.html#C-Dialect-Options
Cheers,
Gabor
I want to compile the GCC 4.1.1 compiler.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
so, where? (also for linux?)
The -std option of gcc is for setting the dialect, see this page:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.1/gcc/C-Dialect-Options.html#C-Dialect-Options
Cheers,
Gabor
___
15 matches
Mail list logo
