On 27/03/2011 21:40, Subbsd wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Erik Trulssonertr1...@student.uu.se wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:19:44PM +0400, Subbsd wrote:
Ive wanted to ask why the option of vim port has not yet been handed
via dialog by default. Personally, to make them work, we
Ive wanted to ask why the option of vim port has not yet been handed
via dialog by default. Personally, to make them work, we must define
WITH_OPTIONS=yes in make.conf (or WITH_VIM_OPTIONS=yes). Life without
it is so difficult ;)
___
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:19:44PM +0400, Subbsd wrote:
Ive wanted to ask why the option of vim port has not yet been handed
via dialog by default. Personally, to make them work, we must define
WITH_OPTIONS=yes in make.conf (or WITH_VIM_OPTIONS=yes). Life without
it is so difficult ;)
Because
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:19:44PM +0400, Subbsd wrote:
Ive wanted to ask why the option of vim port has not yet been handed
via dialog by default. Personally, to make them work, we must define
WITH_OPTIONS=yes in
I expected to hear that just so happened historically. Тext question I
ask only to satisfy my interest. What OPTIONS framework basically can
someone not like it?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2010-October/063914.html
--
Eitan Adler
