On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 01:31:13PM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 02:05:00 -0800, Loren M. Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > PS is the x cookie in anyway related to the user passwd ?
> >
> > Completely unrelated, it's just a random number basicly.
> >
>
> If it is a random n
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 02:05:00 -0800, Loren M. Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > PS is the x cookie in anyway related to the user passwd ?
>
> Completely unrelated, it's just a random number basicly.
>
If it is a random number how can the xserver it user x random number
and not user y random numb
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 01:35:07AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > Thx this clears alot of questions :)
> > One more question doh, about the x cookie.
> >
> > How long does it take to calculate the x cookie string yourself of a
> > user you want to hack :)
> >
>
> PS is the x cookie in anyway rela
> Thx this clears alot of questions :)
> One more question doh, about the x cookie.
>
> How long does it take to calculate the x cookie string yourself of a
> user you want to hack :)
>
PS is the x cookie in anyway related to the user passwd ?
___
freeb
ess that are using unix domain
> > > sockets to not need the MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE stored in the .Xauthority file
> > > in the users home directory so any user can open a program on that
> > > display. xhost +localhost adds all programs from localhost using tcp
> > >
ority file
> > in the users home directory so any user can open a program on that
> > display. xhost +localhost adds all programs from localhost using tcp
> > connections instead. DISPLAY=:0 causes a program to use fast unix
> > domain sockets where DISPLAY=localhost:0
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:48:40 -0800, Loren M. Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 01:49:48PM -0500, epilogue wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:43:39 +0100
> > Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 00:32:23 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt
> > > <[EMAIL PROTE
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 01:49:48PM -0500, epilogue wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:43:39 +0100
> Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 00:32:23 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > While all of this is very interesting academic, if user Gert is
;>sockets to not need the MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE stored in the .Xauthority file
> >>in the users home directory so any user can open a program on that
> >>display. xhost +localhost adds all programs from localhost using tcp
> >>connections instead. DISPLAY=:0 causes a prog
ram on that
display. xhost +localhost adds all programs from localhost using tcp
connections instead. DISPLAY=:0 causes a program to use fast unix
domain sockets where DISPLAY=localhost:0 causes a program to use slow
tcp sockets instead. tcp sockets are really only needed for remote
connections and
that
> display. xhost +localhost adds all programs from localhost using tcp
> connections instead. DISPLAY=:0 causes a program to use fast unix
> domain sockets where DISPLAY=localhost:0 causes a program to use slow
> tcp sockets instead. tcp sockets are really only needed for rem
epilogue wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:43:39 +0100
Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 00:32:23 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While all of this is very interesting academic, if user Gert is dumb
enough to leave the console of his UNIX system accessible t
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 05:02:50PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> >On 02/02/05 06:58 PM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
> >>i want a screensaver but the ... xscreensaver daemon wont start
> >>complaining about acces controle. I did xh
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 06:58:33PM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> i want a screensaver but the ... xscreensaver daemon wont start
> complaining about acces controle. I did xhost +localhost but it still
> wont start :(
Adding localhost will allow all programs running on localhost to
c
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:43:39 +0100
Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 00:32:23 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While all of this is very interesting academic, if user Gert is dumb
> > enough to leave the console of his UNIX system accessible then
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 5:58 pm, Gert Cuykens wrote:
> i want a screensaver but the ... xscreensaver daemon wont start
> complaining about acces controle. I did xhost +localhost but it still
> wont start :(
Sounds like your trying to run the screensaver from a root terminal in
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 00:32:23 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Don't want to be rude but do you have a specific reason for running
> > > xscreensaver as root?
> > >
> > > Chris
> >
> > Well the reason is very simple actuale lets pretend we have a user
> > gert. User gert has a
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gert Cuykens
> Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 6:20 PM
> To: Chris Hodgins
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: xhost +localhost
>
>
> > Don&#x
On 02/03/05 03:19 AM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
> > Don't want to be rude but do you have a specific reason for running
> > xscreensaver as root?
> >
> > Chris
>
> Well the reason is very simple actuale lets pretend we have a user
> gert. User gert has alot of pictures and music s
> Don't want to be rude but do you have a specific reason for running
> xscreensaver as root?
>
> Chris
Well the reason is very simple actuale lets pretend we have a user
gert. User gert has alot of pictures and music stuff phone numbers
user gert dont want does things to be gone. Somebody hacks
On 02/03/05 01:10 AM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
> > I assume this refers to the root window. Surely you're not logged
> > into X as root.
>
> no i am just logged as a user into X and my user name is the same as
> root :) Lets call it the user root window.
>
> > Try this:
> > chec
Gert Cuykens wrote:
I assume this refers to the root window. Surely you're not logged
into X as root.
no i am just logged as a user into X and my user name is the same as
root :) Lets call it the user root window.
Try this:
check your DISPLAY environment variable with
echo $DISPLAY
make sure it'
> I assume this refers to the root window. Surely you're not logged
> into X as root.
no i am just logged as a user into X and my user name is the same as
root :) Lets call it the user root window.
> Try this:
> check your DISPLAY environment variable with
> echo $DISPLAY
> make sure it's ':0.0'
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:24:32 -0600, Henry Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 2/3/2005 at 00:05 Gert Cuykens wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:43:23 -0500, Louis LeBlanc
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >wrote:
> >> On 02/02/05 11:36 PM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
> >> > I# xhost lo
On 02/03/05 12:05 AM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:43:23 -0500, Louis LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 02/02/05 11:36 PM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
> > > I# xhost local:
> > > non-network local connections being added to access control l
Gert Cuykens wrote:
I# xhost local:
non-network local connections being added to access control list
I#
ok that seems to work a bit better meaning i dont get the message "can
not start screen saver deamon bl bla bla." Instead i get a message
in my log that locking is not enabled ?
_
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:43:23 -0500, Louis LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/02/05 11:36 PM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
> > I# xhost local:
> > non-network local connections being added to access control list
> > I#
> >
> > ok that seems to work a bit better meaning i dont get
On 02/02/05 11:36 PM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
> I# xhost local:
> non-network local connections being added to access control list
> I#
>
> ok that seems to work a bit better meaning i dont get the message "can
> not start screen saver deamon bl bla bla." Instead i get a mess
I# xhost local:
non-network local connections being added to access control list
I#
ok that seems to work a bit better meaning i dont get the message "can
not start screen saver deamon bl bla bla." Instead i get a message
in my log that locking is not enabled ?
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
Don't shoot the messenger! :)
Heh, sorry, that wasn't my intention.
[ ... ]
It's probably not the only deprecation or interface change from 4.x. I
believe the 'nslookup' tool is now a wrapper to the 'host' utility, but
I never used either one in complex enough ways to see any
On 02/02/05 05:02 PM, Chuck Swiger sat at the `puter and typed:
> Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> > On 02/02/05 06:58 PM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
> >> i want a screensaver but the ... xscreensaver daemon wont start
> >> complaining about acces controle. I
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
On 02/02/05 06:58 PM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
i want a screensaver but the ... xscreensaver daemon wont start
complaining about acces controle. I did xhost +localhost but it still
wont start :(
If you're trying this on 5.3, the syntax has changed.
On 02/02/05 06:58 PM, Gert Cuykens sat at the `puter and typed:
> i want a screensaver but the ... xscreensaver daemon wont start
> complaining about acces controle. I did xhost +localhost but it still
> wont start :(
If you're trying this on 5.3, the syntax has changed. Try
i want a screensaver but the ... xscreensaver daemon wont start
complaining about acces controle. I did xhost +localhost but it still
wont start :(
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
34 matches
Mail list logo
