"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
>
> Jamie Norwood wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 06:35:20PM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > > [Hey, what about this "Roasting Newbies" subject? I have read all
> > > messages so far in this thread, and couldn't find any tips or shared
> > > experiences on the
Would the fact that Yahoo! runs FreeBSD (it does) satisfy your client...?
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Michael Lucas wrote:
>
> > You know that, and I know that.
> >
> > Clients like the little piece of paper. Especially when I bill
> > hourly, and they've
At 07:42 PM 10/12/99 , Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>At 06:35 PM 10/12/99 , Michael Lucas wrote:
>> Traditionally, the best time to get on a FreeBSD branch has been when
>> it hits *.5. Is this still true with 3.x?
>
>I guess you'll find out when we hit 3.5, won't you? :) This isn't
>actually as flip
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Jimmy Zongos wrote:
> Anyone know were to buy a NE2000 compatible card for pretty cheap
> that will work in freebsd
The D-Link ISA DE220PCT (I think that's the model) is more-or-less
hardware-compatible with the NE2000. (From what I can see from reading
the ed driver sour
At 09:37 AM 10/12/99 -0400, Daniel Tso wrote:
>> A link doesn't have (used) permissions. You must look to the permissions
>> of the file where the link points to.
>>
>> Think about it. If the permissions of the link matter, everybody can make
>> a link to every program and give himself the permis
While upgrading 3.2-RELEASE to 3.3-STABLE (Oct 11), a make world failed
due to the non-existence of "unroff", which i found in the ports
collection. Was this an oversight, or has unroff made it into the main
distribution since 3.2-RELEASE?
The point at which it halted was while building share/d
> > Thanks for a couple of previous suggestions, but I still have the same
> > problem. I checked the symbolic link for X and it appeared correct, except
> > for the group access:
> >
> > lrwxrwxr-x 1 root 12000 24 May 28 20:58 /usr/X11R6/bin/X ->
> > /usr/X11R6/bin/XF86_Mach64*
> >
>
Well I guess I am the fool then. Sorry to waste everyone's time on this and
thanks to all for solving my RTF-README problem.
>
>
> softupdates were moved from /usr/src/contrib/sys/softupdates to
> /usr/src/sys/contrib/softupdates . Update your links in /sys/ufs/ffs
>
Of course I did learn a v
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Paul Horechuk wrote:
> Thanks for a couple of previous suggestions, but I still have the same
> problem. I checked the symbolic link for X and it appeared correct, except
> for the group access:
>
> lrwxrwxr-x 1 root 12000 24 May 28 20:58 /usr/X11R6/bin/X ->
> /u
Thanks for a couple of previous suggestions, but I still have the same
problem. I checked the symbolic link for X and it appeared correct, except
for the group access:
lrwxrwxr-x 1 root 12000 24 May 28 20:58 /usr/X11R6/bin/X ->
/usr/X11R6/bin/XF86_Mach64*
I recreated it as wheel.
St
I wrote:
>
> Beside whois [-a | -r | -p | ...] , you could "traceroute
Arrrgggh !!! I crosposted my last email to the wrong mailing list ... it
was suppost to go to -security and not to -stable Sorry about this
!
Christoph
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
Beside whois [-a | -r | -p | ...] , you could "traceroute
", find a host nearby the destination, and see if you can
resolve that hostname. Once you have the domain name of the nearby host,
find the nameserver (NS-record) for the domain and check if you can find
out more if you directly query that
12 matches
Mail list logo
