: How many instances of postmark are you running? I used 4 separate
:instances (you must run them in separate directories).
Well, you didn't say that! :-) I'm running one. I'll start up
another couple to match your test.
: How fast are your disks? I used an external RAID-5 array t
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :FYI: On hub.freebsd.org (the freebsd mailing list server), if we activate
> :softupdates on the disk containing the postfix spool, the machine reboots
> :(silently if I recall correctly) within 5 minutes of postfix starting up.
> :
> :This is a much
:
:FYI: On hub.freebsd.org (the freebsd mailing list server), if we activate
:softupdates on the disk containing the postfix spool, the machine reboots
:(silently if I recall correctly) within 5 minutes of postfix starting up.
:
:This is a much smaller system of course, with smaller memory and fi
I will be sending them to you in a seperate e-mail. I guess that those
sites must have just died... Does anybody know if it is legal for me to
host those replacement files on my own ftp server? I'm not really good
at reading licenses...
Darren Wiebe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
William Woods wrote:
>
>
> "WW" == William Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
WW> I am useing (trying to anyway) the StarOffice 5 port on a FreeBSD
WW> 3.4 system /usr/ports/editors/staroffice5 but its asking for a
WW> couple libs: Here is the makefile:
I installed without the using the port. It was quite trivial.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bob Willcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have noticed that the host command no longer produces the same output
> as it did prior to the bind 8.2.2p5 import to 3.4.
>
> For machines with an MX record prior to bind 8.2.2p5 I used to get:
>
> bob@obiwan-p4 /home/b
unsubscribe freebsd-ports
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
> > OK, so I raised NMBCLUSTERS to 4096, and installed a second freebsd-stable
> > box also with NMBCLUSTERS at 4096, and I managed to have them both panic
> > at the same time (unfortunately, only one of them gave me a crash dump).
> > But anyway, here is t
I have noticed that the host command no longer produces the same output
as it did prior to the bind 8.2.2p5 import to 3.4.
For machines with an MX record prior to bind 8.2.2p5 I used to get:
bob@obiwan-p4 /home/bob> host umd1.umd.edu
umd1.umd.edu is a nickname for haven.umd.edu
haven.umd.edu has
Of course, the problem could be that linux is simply not reporting the
right temperature (too low), and that your overclocked chips simply can't
handle SMP.
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, David Kelly wrote:
> Ted Sikora writes:
> > Well I built another kernel without SMP and the temp dropped so I am
> > b
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Ted Sikora wrote:
>
> The voltage readings by the winbond IC in the bios are accurate.
> The case temperature was 5F cooler than reported.
> So I would conclude the readings from the bios are a fairly accurate
> representation of the machines current condition.
Was this tested with both Linux (o
As I recall, Mike Smith wrote:
>> o The standard 3.3-RELEASE UniProcessor kernel runs identical to
>> Linux.
>
> This is because both systems use the HLT instruction, which has a low
> power consumption. You've already been told this.
>
>> o FreeBSD SMP kernels immediately run hotter than t
At 10:27 PM -0800 1999/12/30, Mike Smith wrote:
> The difference has already been explained as a different instruction mix.
> This should be obvious to anyone that has been in the industry for as
> long as you have.
It seems to me that you guys are all talking past each other:
14 matches
Mail list logo
