spontanious by-weekly crashes

2000-05-25 Thread mi
Hello! An old dual-pentium 100 machine began crashing after I upgraded it to 4.0-STABLE from 3.4-STABLE. I'd just discount it as a hardware problem revealed by some of the new features of the OS, but the last two crashes happened at the time exactly two weeks apart: May 11 00:46:34

Re: ad0 drivers revisited

2000-05-25 Thread Jim Weeks
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kent Stewart writes: > > The sysctl code in rc IMO needs to be executed earlier. If one is > having problems reading from an ATA boot disk, e.g. cannot load init or > rc, these modes need to be set earlier. Why not a boot flag that sets > atamodes to be as

Re: Problems compiling FreeBSD stable

2000-05-25 Thread Graham Wheeler
Graham Wheeler wrote: > > Hi all > > I am trying to do a `make world' after cvsup'ing my whole /usr/src tree > to the latest RELENG_4 stable release (international version). I'm > getting a whole load of errors when it gets to compiling gcc though. I > have attached the tail end of my make outpu

using more than one md pseudo-device w/ 4.0

2000-05-25 Thread Adam Mackler
The md pseudo-device does work as described in the handbook in section 10.6.2. However it doesn't seem to work when I try to use a device other than /dev/md0, specifically /dev/md1. Some other pseudo-devices can be specified in the kernel configuration with a number to indicate the number of uni

Re: ntpdate could not sync time from any server.

2000-05-25 Thread Mark Ovens
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 07:48:03PM +, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 10:15:21AM -0700, Glen Gross wrote: > > I have had the same experience, with a DSL line. I don't know if > > ntpdate requires the time to be within a certain threshold before > > it will sync or not. Does anyone

Re: Transparent proxies and fetch

2000-05-25 Thread Bob K
On Thu, 25 May 2000, Steve Roome wrote: > Then again, someone might have a better solution, but IMHO I think > it's quite rude of ISP's to divert your traffic without letting you > know about it, imagine how you'd feel if they started diverting all > your outgoing port23 connections and archiving

Re: ad0 drivers revisited

2000-05-25 Thread Gerhard Sittig
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 19:48 -0400, Jim Weeks wrote: > > On Mon, 22 May 2000, Alan Edmonds wrote: > > > > What worked for me was to put > > hw.atamodes=pio,,pio, > > in /etc/sysctl.conf > > I tried this also. Did you by any chance use this along with > /sbin/sysctl -w hw.atamodes=pio,pio,p

Re: Transparent proxies and fetch

2000-05-25 Thread Steve Roome
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 11:00:18AM +1000, Joe Shevland wrote: > when building ports. Someone wrote in asking whether our ISP has implemented a > transparent proxy. Unfortunately I culled my mail folder so I can't respond > directly, but the poster was on the money (the ISP grabs any port 80 reques

Re: 4-stable won't boot

2000-05-25 Thread Steve Roome
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 08:35:55PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I just did a cvsup to RELENG_4 about noon EST today (Wed), built world, > > installed a new kernel, and rebooted. now, when I boot, I get the > > following: > ... > > Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s3a > > no such dev

Problems compiling FreeBSD stable

2000-05-25 Thread Graham Wheeler
Hi all I am trying to do a `make world' after cvsup'ing my whole /usr/src tree to the latest RELENG_4 stable release (international version). I'm getting a whole load of errors when it gets to compiling gcc though. I have attached the tail end of my make output. Also, I managed to build a kernel

makeworld fails on alpha

2000-05-25 Thread Bjarne Blichfeldt
Just did a fresh cvsup on tag=RELENG_4. make buildworld fails with : don't know how to make twe.4 The reference to twe.4 is in share/man/man4/Makefile. When the reference is removed, make in share/man/man4/Makefile succeeds. mvh, Bjarne Blichfeldt To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT

Re: make buildworld failing on libssh

2000-05-25 Thread Kent Stewart
Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, 25 May 2000, Adam Mackler wrote: > > > now, the only mystery left is how did it work for so long? > > Until recently the 5.0 crypto code hadnt diverged from 4.0 very much (and > would have worked fine) It is still broken right now any way. It doesn't know how

Re: make buildworld failing on libssh

2000-05-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, 25 May 2000, Adam Mackler wrote: > now, the only mystery left is how did it work for so long? Until recently the 5.0 crypto code hadnt diverged from 4.0 very much (and would have worked fine) Kris In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsy

Re: make buildworld failing on libssh

2000-05-25 Thread Adam Mackler
On Thu, 25 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, 24 May 2000, Adam Mackler wrote: > > > I have cvsuped the RELENG_4 stable-supfile with the > > international secure-supfile, and when I make buildworld it fails, > > saying: > > Wrong supfile - you grabbed -current. once again proving that t