I meant to send this out yesterday, but forgot. I have merged the KAME
code from -current, which brings 4.1 up to the most recent sources from
the KAME project (http://www.kame.net). What does this give us? I'm glad
you asked :-)
* Signficantly improved IPSEC functionality. In particular, IPSEC
Add device pcm to your kernel.
(38) sean@pulse: ~ $ cat /dev/sndstat
FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) Jun 29 2000 01:10:19
Installed devices:
pcm0: AudioPCI ES1371 at io 0x1080 irq 5 (1p/1r channels duplex)
I've got the same card, and it works perfectly.
On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, Andreas Ntaflos
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Joachim [iso-8859-1] Strömbergson wrote:
Just for kicks I tried doing a 'make -j4 buildkernel' with KERNEL=SNP40
in /etc/make.conf and /boot/loader.conf. It works, that is the make
finished without crashing. I dunno if the
Is it possible to ignore the "reboot in signle mode" part?
It is not possible to get this system into single mode, because it has to be up,
always.
it can have a maximum downtime of maybe 45 seconds, which is too long to go into
single mode and compile stuff.
I know it is obviously more
We (Internet America) have a BUNCH of 4.0-Stable systems in
productuion. It's MUCH more stable than 3.x in heavy
network environments.
Larrym
Hello,
What is the latest FreeBSD-STABLE release, and is it stable enough for a
productional system?
Thanks,
Noor Dawod
To
A recent make world
FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE (HOST_NAME) #0: Mon Jul 17 10:01:43 EST 2000
with files supped 13 Jul 2000
fails with
=== usr.sbin/lptcontrol
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a-I/usr/obj/usr/local/src/i386/usr/include
/usr/local/src/usr.sbin/lptcontrol/lptcontrol.c
G'day,
I've got a copy of 4.0 RELEASE (from the CD) that I've been trying
unsuccessfully to update to 4.0-STABLE for the last few weeks. I've
been watching this list, and taking note of what I've seen, and
my procedure is this :
I CVSup the latest source from cvsup3.au.FreeBSD.org (I'm in
At 9:40 PM -0400 7/16/00, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
Is it possible to ignore the "reboot in single mode" part?
It is not possible to get this system into single mode, because
it has to be up, always.
it can have a maximum downtime of maybe 45 seconds, which is
too long to go into single mode and
Hi All,
I just finished upgrading as the subject line says, and I've noticed two
anomalies.
1) On boot I get the message:
module_register: module netgraph already exists!
linker_file_sysinit "netgraph.ko" failed to register! 17
I use my box as a router to distribute a DSL PPPoE feed to some
After all the recent chat following that heads-up about how to build a
world, I gave it a shot and rebuilt my system, gave the buildkernel and
installkernel a KERNEL=MYCROFT setting, and adjusted /boot/loader.conf so
it'd load /MYCROFT. All went well, but I noticed that the kernel build
number
unsubscribe freebsd-stable
Andrew "Dru" Fitz-Glenville Brown
MGMT/STS
May 2001 ( Yeah right!)
North Hall 218
RPI Residence
110 8th street
Troy N.Y. 12180
518-276-7230
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Dance... even if it's only in your own living room when nobody's
On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Timothy L. Robertson wrote:
Hi All,
I just finished upgrading as the subject line says, and I've noticed two
anomalies.
1) On boot I get the message:
module_register: module netgraph already exists!
linker_file_sysinit "netgraph.ko" failed to register! 17
I use my box as a
William Denton wrote:
After all the recent chat following that heads-up about how to build a
world, I gave it a shot and rebuilt my system, gave the buildkernel and
installkernel a KERNEL=MYCROFT setting, and adjusted /boot/loader.conf so
it'd load /MYCROFT. All went well, but I noticed
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 12:44:29 +1000, Clary Harridge wrote:
A recent make world
FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE (HOST_NAME) #0: Mon Jul 17 10:01:43 EST 2000
with files supped 13 Jul 2000
fails with
=== usr.sbin/lptcontrol
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a
14 matches
Mail list logo
