ipfw/natd, problems with 4.1 RC?

2000-07-27 Thread Andreas Ntaflos
Yo, I am having problems in getting ipfw with natd to work on this my fbsd 4.1 RC machine. according to the natd manpage, its just about 4 lines that are needed to run natd and 'masq' a subnet or a single other machine from the internet. i got two interfaces, one xl0 which is connected to the

Re: my sb16 play sound with clicks after cvsup

2000-07-27 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 03:46:42PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Francesco Casadei wrote: Today I cvsuped and rebuilt everything. After reboot, I started xmms-1.2.2 as usual to play mp3 files and I heard sound with clicks (like the sound of an old record). It's a

Re: ipfw/natd, problems with 4.1 RC?

2000-07-27 Thread Brian O'Shea
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:54:22AM +0200, Andreas Ntaflos wrote: Yo, I am having problems in getting ipfw with natd to work on this my fbsd 4.1 RC machine. according to the natd manpage, its just about 4 lines that are needed to run natd and 'masq' a subnet or a single other machine from the

Re: ipfw/natd, problems with 4.1 RC?

2000-07-27 Thread Andreas Ntaflos
thanks, but i have gateway_enable="YES" set. i also have the sysctl -w net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 command set in rc.conf, but that doesnt seem to impress my machine at all. maybe this is a problem with the current version of 4.1? thanks and regards Andreas Ntaflos Brian O'Shea wrote: On Thu,

Re: [pcm0 play interrupt timeout, channel dead] and other problems

2000-07-27 Thread Devin Butterfield
Index: channel.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/channel.c,v retrieving revision 1.32 diff -u -r1.32 channel.c --- channel.c 2000/06/20 23:42:08 1.32 +++ channel.c 2000/07/22 17:36:34 @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@

Re: Innacurate statements in handbook about buildkernel

2000-07-27 Thread Chad R. Larson
As I recall, Bob K wrote: No, no. You're all forgetting that on a system where the source, libraries, and building tools never change, it will always build consistently. It only comes into play when upgrading, but is merely one other thing to do differently while doing so. But I was

Re: agp and 3dfx

2000-07-27 Thread Doug Rabson
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Mike Muir wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, We will need more than the basic X-server to use any new graphics board, as their main selling point is 3D, and the basic drivers of X are way behind. The main issue is in establishing FreeBSD as a "credible"

Re: URGENT: bad superblock

2000-07-27 Thread andrew
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, FreeBSD wrote: cylinders, so you could write up a quick script to grab the disklabel search for super-blocks. Or scan every sector... ;) There are tools for this in ports...gpart I think. Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe

Re: make world fail (at) (fwd)

2000-07-27 Thread Rasmus Skaarup
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: Rasmus Skaarup wrote: I did a fresh cvsup in a empty /usr/src directory, and got the exact same error: I did not follow this thread, but I assume you also had an empty /usr/obj? No. I removed the obj directory, and tried again and now

src code freeze is over for RELENG_4

2000-07-27 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
You may now go back to whacking on the RELENG_4 branch with the usual degree of -stable discretion. Good release, guys. Next stop is 4.2-RELEASE in mid-November 2000! - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Re: ipfw/natd, problems with 4.1 RC?

2000-07-27 Thread Chris D. Faulhaber
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Andreas Ntaflos wrote: thanks, but i have gateway_enable="YES" set. i also have the sysctl -w net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 command set in rc.conf, but that doesnt seem to impress my machine at all. maybe this is a problem with the current version of 4.1? Generically

make buildworld after a recent cvsup

2000-07-27 Thread Keith Mackay
Recently, I cvsup'd to what I assume is 4.1-RELEASE and got the following error on a make buildworld: btxld -v -E 0x1000 -f bin -b /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2/../btx/btx/btx -l boot2.ldr -o boot2.ld -P 1 boot2.bin kernel: ver=1.01 size=750 load=9000 entry=9010 map=16M pgctl=1:1 client:

Re: 4.1-RELEASE will be tagged and done tonite, starting at 18:00PDTT

2000-07-27 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, John Polstra wrote: For one thing, US crypto policy has been dictated 100% by politics for at least the past 10 years. It could easily be reversed yet again. (I don't think it will be reversed, but it is certainly a real possibility.) I would hate to see us throw out

Re: [pcm0 play interrupt timeout, channel dead] and other problems

2000-07-27 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 06:14:09PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: Bill, do you use suspend/resume on your machine? I believe that some recent change in the pcm driver has hosed this! :( No, post-peter-config(8)-axe ate my apm, so I haven't used anything APM since then. My laptop also has

Re: PNPBIOS and atkbd

2000-07-27 Thread Mike Smith
Since someone clued me in about using the PNPBIOS option to automate some isa resource allocations I have been experimenting with it. I've managed to remove most of the irq stuff from my kernel configuration file, apart from a few culprits. The main one is the keyboard and mouse. The

General update methodology question

2000-07-27 Thread Chris BeHanna
I was out for a walk, and I thought that the following might be a good idea: 1) locally mirror the FreeBSD CVSROOT (how would I do this?), re-syncing as I felt like it. 2) Pull a working tree out from either a branch (e.g., RELENG_4) or a fixed tag (e.g.,

Re: [pcm0 play interrupt timeout, channel dead] and other problems

2000-07-27 Thread Devin Butterfield
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Josef Karthauser wrote: On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 10:18:13PM -0700, Christopher Shumway wrote: Apply this patch to src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/channel.c, it seems to fix it on my Sony Viao Z505SX. (Credit goes to Bill Fumerola) --- channel.c.orig Tue Jun 20 16:42:08

Re: Which applications are using kqueue ?

2000-07-27 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, ym g wrote: Are there any applications which use this ? A few at the moment, but they're growing. tail -f, and the l0pht-watch ports are the only apps I know of at the moment, both of which achieve dramatic reductions in CPU time (and better performance, for l0pht-watch)

Problem building 4.1-STABLE today

2000-07-27 Thread Nick Popoff
I cvsuped STABLE around lunch today and I'm having trouble compiling. The problem I'm seeing is in the install phase when it creates the /usr/include directories. From what I can tell, it deletes most of the directories there, then uses mtree to recreate them before running 'install' to copy

Re: Which applications are using kqueue ?

2000-07-27 Thread Andrew Reilly
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 03:24:27PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, ym g wrote: Are there plans for any apps like thin/fast [maybe in kernel] webserver which uses kqueue I've been tinkering with kq'ing thttpd - in fact I have it working (which was trivial), although it's

make buildkernel failed in 4.1-S

2000-07-27 Thread Sergei Vyshenski
Running FreeBSD 4.1-RC () #0: Wed Jul 26 15:36:37 MSD 2000 cvsupped and built ok only 2 days ago. Today cvsupped again because of announced 4.1-RELEASE. "make world" went fine, then I mergemastered, but then "make buildkernel" failed for both GENERIC and my custom kernels at the same point as

Re: Problem building 4.1-STABLE today

2000-07-27 Thread Richard Martin
Nick Popoff wrote: I cvsuped STABLE around lunch today and I'm having trouble compiling. The problem I'm seeing is in the install phase when it creates the /usr/include directories. Is anyone else running into this? Following the instructions in UPDATING, my build fails under

Re: Which applications are using kqueue ?

2000-07-27 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Andrew Reilly wrote: The boa HTTP server might be as good a place to start too: it doesn't fork either (except to run CGI scripts). Actually, thttpd sounds pretty similar. I hadn't looked at it before. Have you compared them at all? Nope, but the 't' appealed to me

Kernel build problem with buildkernel

2000-07-27 Thread Matt Heckaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I CVSup'd from 4.0-stable to 4.1-stable last night, the upgrade went well as did the first make buildkernel installkernel, as advised. I rebooted the system, cleaned up from the make world, blew /usr/obj, etc. I then realized that I forgot

Re: Which applications are using kqueue ?

2000-07-27 Thread Peter Radcliffe
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] probably said: On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Andrew Reilly wrote: The boa HTTP server might be as good a place to start too: it doesn't fork either (except to run CGI scripts). Actually, thttpd sounds pretty similar. I hadn't looked at it before. Have you

Re: Which applications are using kqueue ?

2000-07-27 Thread Tony Finch
Andrew Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 03:24:27PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, ym g wrote: Are there plans for any apps like thin/fast [maybe in kernel] webserver which uses kqueue I've been tinkering with kq'ing thttpd - in fact I have it

Re: Which applications are using kqueue ?

2000-07-27 Thread Nick Popoff
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Andrew Reilly wrote: The boa HTTP server might be as good a place to start too: it doesn't fork either (except to run CGI scripts). Actually, thttpd sounds pretty similar. I hadn't looked at it before. Have you compared them at all? Nope, but the 't'