On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 04:18:55PM +0200, Michal Mertl wrote:
For testing purposed I was sometimes using 'telnet -s'.
In recent versions (4.1.1 and stable) it stopped working
Environment:
host# ifconfig fxp0
fxp0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
inet
At 04:18 PM 10/12/00 +0200, Michal Mertl wrote:
For testing purposed I was sometimes using 'telnet -s'.
In recent versions (4.1.1 and stable) it stopped working
Environment:
host# ifconfig fxp0
fxp0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
inet 192.168.0.2 netmask
Chris,
Your email prompted me to look at mbuf utilization on a 4.1.1-STABLE box
that is currently not in production.
outside# netstat -m
130/160/7168 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
129 mbufs allocated to data
1 mbufs allocated to packet headers
128/136/1792 mbuf clusters in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I thought I would through this into the mix:
Server, NOT in production yet: 4.1.1-RELEASE:
matt[beta]:~ uptime;netstat -m
10:40AM up 16 days, 1:42, 2 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
132/352/131072 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
What tag should I use to upgrade from 4.0 to 4.1 (not 4.1.1, because I
also run KAME)? I have tried RELENG_4_1_0, but that gives a partial
source tree. 4_1_0_RELEASE only gives a file in /usr/sup/src-all.
rvdp
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
There are two entirely different RAID controller families that are
relabelled as "PERC 2". See
http://people.freebsd.org/~msmith/RAID/index.html#ami
and
http://people.freebsd.org/~msmith/RAID/index.html#adaptec
for more details.
Do you know which AMI controllers the two compatible
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Matt Heckaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I thought I would through this into the mix:
Server, NOT in production yet: 4.1.1-RELEASE:
matt[beta]:~ uptime;netstat -m
10:40AM up 16 days, 1:42, 2 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Dont know how many different revisions there are, but I picked up a used
PERC/2 which seems to correspond to the 466.
---Mike
At 04:10 PM 10/12/00 +0100, Mark Powell wrote:
There are two entirely different RAID controller families that are
relabelled as "PERC 2". See
BIOS don't has such options.
But whith today's kernel (second channel (ahc2) without devices)
3940 seems to work:
Yes, my commit last night was meant to protect the timeout handler
from just such a problem. Unfortunately, the second channel is still
not getting interrupts, but after the
I may have missed the all clear... also, do I need to do anything out of
the ordinary in order to account for the changes, or can I just uncomment
the cron job I had commented out when I saw the heads up?
I apologize if this isn't the right list, but I figured you guys would be
on top of
Hello!
I wonder if there are any plans or work in progress to
port sendmail 8.11.1 from -current to -stable ?
Both, 3-stable and 4- stable have 8.9.3.1
The sendmail that is present in the -current tree seems to compile
smoothly on 4.x (even on 4.0-RELEASE box), while
breaks on 3.5.1-RELEASE
11 matches
Mail list logo
