Ralf Meyer wrote:
>
> Hej all,
>
> after rebuilding world and kernel /stand/sysinstall fails to access my
> CDROM device with the following console messages:
>
> ata0-slave: too many segments in DMA table
> acd0: READ_BIG - ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=21 ascq=00 error=02
>
> If I mount the dev
Hej all,
after rebuilding world and kernel /stand/sysinstall fails to access my
CDROM device with the following console messages:
ata0-slave: too many segments in DMA table
acd0: READ_BIG - ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=21 ascq=00 error=02
If I mount the device manually everything works. The old i
I just got done chatting with Warner Losh about PCI modems. He is "pretty
sure" that his PCI modem driver made its way into -stable and 4.1.1-R.
The supported hardware docs and release notes do not list PCI modems as
supported. (Unless I am blind in which case I will toddle along quietly,
bumpi
Hi. I was wondering if this is even possible or I am looking for too much.
I use a 56K dialup connection. I am using PPP Nat to share with a LAN.
Bandwidth sharing doesn't seem to be too efficient. For example if Machine-1
on the LAN is doing a major download of a compressed file and getting near
-On [20001027 19:05], Alfred Perlstein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>* Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001027 09:53] wrote:
>> You totally miss the point I was trying to communicate across.
>>
>> While I strive to make sure everything I MFC is tested i
On 28-Oct-00 Matt Dillon wrote:
>:> # optional dd if you are paranoid
>:> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 bs=32k count=4
>:> fdisk -I da0
>:> disklabel -w -r da0s1 auto
>:>
>:> That's much preferable to having to use sysinstall if all you want to
>:> do is initializ
:> # optional dd if you are paranoid
:> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 bs=32k count=4
:> fdisk -I da0
:> disklabel -w -r da0s1 auto
:>
:> That's much preferable to having to use sysinstall if all you want to
:> do is initialize a label on a slice.
:
:Yes, this is de
Yes, but it looks like the thought police are also on my heals.
=-)
On 27 Oct, blaine wrote:
> He only needed a 3 word answer. Merged From Current.
>
> Chris Faulhaber wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 03:39:30PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > ...
>> > What is MFC?
>> >
On 28-Oct-00 Matt Dillon wrote:
>:> I think you are specifying the wrong arguments to disklabel; I
>:> seem to rememebr a -w/-W distinction...
>:
>:Nope.
>:
>:> In any case, I'm running with a disklabel inside a DOS partition
>:> on all but one box of mine, and always have been. I installed
>:>
He only needed a 3 word answer. Merged From Current.
Chris Faulhaber wrote:
> [ trimming -developers ]
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 03:39:30PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What's an MFC?
> > In Windoze it's Microsoft Foundation Class.
> > I gather that is not what it is here.
> > Wha
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
> >
> > There are some things which are broken in -stable that need to be
> > fixed (alpha booting, e.g.). We'll try to leave the world a better
> > place for our efforts.
>
> -stable world builds, installs and boots on my pws433 as of earlier
> today (w
:> I think you are specifying the wrong arguments to disklabel; I
:> seem to rememebr a -w/-W distinction...
:
:Nope.
:
:> In any case, I'm running with a disklabel inside a DOS partition
:> on all but one box of mine, and always have been. I installed
:> 4.1 on my laptop that way.
:
:Sysinstall
>
> There are some things which are broken in -stable that need to be
> fixed (alpha booting, e.g.). We'll try to leave the world a better
> place for our efforts.
-stable world builds, installs and boots on my pws433 as of earlier
today (with dfr's ata fix).
--
... every activity meets with
Hi
Just upgraded to recent stable from ~month old stable and:
Oct 27 18:18:29 bsd IPXrouted[85]: socket: Protocol not supported
Something wrong with IPX ?
Nothing in UPDATING though...
L.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the messa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Stop here. Start everywhere.") writes:
> I thought I would spread this to the mailing list just in case no one
> knew about it, and ask whether ipfw does implement all of the mentioned
> requirements:
>
> ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2979.txt
>
> Well, does ipfw support all
A crashdump would be a lot more helpful. see:
http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/kerneldebug.html
-Alfred
* Michael Bacarella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001027 08:19] wrote:
> This keeps happening to one of our multiprocessor servers. About twice
> a day.
>
> panic: vm_page_remove(): page not found in
This keeps happening to one of our multiprocessor servers. About twice
a day.
panic: vm_page_remove(): page not found in hash
mp_lock = 0101; cpuid = 1; lapic.id = 0100
boot() called on cpu#1
syncing disks... 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68
giving up on 67 bu
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 09:44:28AM -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> I am also seeing BTX failures, but only from manual commands. The lsdev
> command will cause BTX to fail (and halt) when it scans my CDROM/DVD. I am
> using 4.1.1-RELEASE. I have a ABIT KA7-100 board (which uses the VIA686A
>
I am also seeing BTX failures, but only from manual commands. The lsdev
command will cause BTX to fail (and halt) when it scans my CDROM/DVD. I am
using 4.1.1-RELEASE. I have a ABIT KA7-100 board (which uses the VIA686A
chipset for IDE access).
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Me
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>you write:
}Danny Braniss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
}
}He was not seeing a PXE bug, it was a loader issue with the BIOS.
}The PXE bug you are seeing is with anything build 078 or earlier.
}Intel has a bug in their rom which they fixed back in March of this year.
}
Danny Braniss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>you write:
> }This is really weird. I have two valinux rackmount boxes, duel cpu's.
> }
> }I was testing the PXE stuff and booting one of the boxes regularly.
> }All of a sudden every time I reboot I get:
> }
>
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:18:37PM +0100, Bap wrote:
> Where?
>
> > There is a recent fix to the brooktree driver.
> >
> > --
> > Michel Talon
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> >
>
>
>
> To Unsubsc
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>you write:
}This is really weird. I have two valinux rackmount boxes, duel cpu's.
}
}I was testing the PXE stuff and booting one of the boxes regularly.
}All of a sudden every time I reboot I get:
}
i've seen the same, i just reboot it, and it works. s
This reminds me of another issue I have wondered about for some time.
Are there major advantages to be gained by disabling support for other
architectures in the kernel build file? I have been routinely turning off
386 and 486 support, thinking this would speed things up... but I'm not
sure of t
Where?
> There is a recent fix to the brooktree driver.
>
> --
> Michel Talon
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body
There is a recent fix to the brooktree driver.
--
Michel Talon
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
26 matches
Mail list logo
