On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 09:38:02AM +0200, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 01:27:33 +0200
Dimitry Andric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DA Squid with gcc 2.95.2 and optimization (both -O, -O2 and -O666), and
DA I can assure you it bombed out with inexplicable null pointer
DA
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 06:08:34PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 08:38:30PM -0400, User Witr wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
:-As far as I know FreeBSD doesn't support nor recommened compiling
:-things (especially large mission critical programs) with anything
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Donn Miller wrote:
If
you want to make a program run faster, you've got to write implement
better algorithms, and its as simple as that. Beyond that, you'll just
have to get faster HW.
This in general is true,
I just had a look at the gcc-bugs mailing list archive, at
URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/. The reason for this is that I
spent a few hours yesterday on some code that worked about a month
ago, but now misbehaves in odd ways. I suspect that if I had been a
less experienced programmer,
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 02:12:51PM +0200, Raymond Wiker wrote:
I just had a look at the gcc-bugs mailing list archive, at
URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/. The reason for this is that I
spent a few hours yesterday on some code that worked about a month
ago, but now misbehaves in odd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2001-04-28 at 14:12 Raymond Wiker wrote:
Anyway, I came across the following bug report:
URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2001-04/msg00707.html. This
looks pretty serious.
Sorry, but this is not a bug. The expression:
cout f(d) \t
Dimitry Andric writes:
Anyway, I came across the following bug report:
URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2001-04/msg00707.html. This
looks pretty serious.
Sorry, but this is not a bug. The expression:
cout f(d) \t d endl;
is equivalent to:
(((cout f(d))
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 06:10:00 -0400
Donn Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DM Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
DM It makes me wonder just how safe -O is :(
DM
DM I think Window Maker compiles parts of its code with -O0. Must be for
DM good reason. I think the only time you're going to see a
Hello, stable-users.
I used FreeBSD 4.3-RC(1), and cvsuped with RELENG_4_3_0_RELEASE on
27th Apr, did make world, make kernel, and then reboot on 28th. I
thought there was no problem, but 1 day later, kernel logged following
message and freeze.
Apr 28 03:02:04 www /kernel:
On Apr 29 2001, ?$B?EDM5G7?(B wrote:
Hello, stable-users.
I used FreeBSD 4.3-RC(1), and cvsuped with RELENG_4_3_0_RELEASE on
27th Apr, did make world, make kernel, and then reboot on 28th. I
thought there was no problem, but 1 day later, kernel logged following
message and freeze.
...
Hello,
I run a dial-in server on 4.3-STABLE machine with 2 Multicom cards.
Actually, since I updated it two days ago,I get ' /kernel : sio28 : 1
more silo overflow (total ...)' every few seconds. I checked
freebsd-questons@, found a lot of questions , some answers about DMA/USB
stuff, nothing
Thanks for your reply.
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 18:46:47 +0200
Thomas Seck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
;
I used FreeBSD 4.3-RC(1), and cvsuped with RELENG_4_3_0_RELEASE on
27th Apr, did make world, make kernel, and then reboot on 28th. I
thought there was no problem, but 1 day later, kernel
how come MAKEDEV has a reference to usio (usb serial) but src doesnt have
any references on creatign this device?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
13 matches
Mail list logo
