I had problems building Mesa3 with XFree86-4.1.0. I did discover a
"work around" which I posted as a PR:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=28228
This is the process I used to make Mesa3. The resulting binaries and
libraries seemed to work fine.
cd /usr/ports/graphics/Mesa3
make
cd wo
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 12:58:27PM -0400, a clever sheep wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 11:28:45AM -0400, Kenneth Mays wrote:
> >
> > Successful install notes on using these applications on v4.3-R
> > 1. XFree86 v4.1.x
> > 2. Gnome 1.4.x
> > 3. KDE 2.1.x
> > 4. Netscape v4.77, 6.1
>
> am i jus
I mounted a WinNT share and then tried to mount a second one from a
machine which wasn't finished booting yet. I'm not yet sure which
caused the panic; I'll provide more details if/when I bump into
them... but what I can provide now is a copy of a gdb -k run with
backtrace. This is 4.3-STABLE as
Le 2001-06-15, Thomas Quinot écrivait :
> for map in ${KEYMAPS} ; do \
> - kbdcontrol -L $$map | \
> + (cd ${.CURDIR}/../../share/syscons/keymaps; \
> + kbdcontrol -L $$map) | \
> sed -e '/^static accentmap_t/,$$d' >> keymap.
> "MS" == Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Yes, but I want to go to single user mode to do make installworld.
MS> This is not necessary.
Yes, it is, the way I run these machines.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the me
> "RLS" == Robert L Sowders writes:
RLS> I had the same problem,
RLS> I think I was at single user mode, but the file systems were
RLS> still mounted and I was still on the network. Just could not
RLS> login from anywhere but the console. Looks like single user mode
RLS> to me.
That woul
> "t" == tenebrae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
t> On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Vivek Khera wrote:
>> > "t" == tenebrae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> answers on both ethernets). The console then just sits there. I
>> >> never get the "flushing buffers" messages, nor do I get a prompt fo
As a side note: if this is the problem, sendmail will not block
_forever_. It will eventually time out. I don't know what the actual
value is, but it seems like 5 minutes or something, so it could easily
seem like it's frozen.
-Bill
Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> The place where I have come across this
The place where I have come across this is on DNS timeouts. e.g. if you
have an IP address on an interface that has as its DNS a non reachable
server (for whatever reason), sendmail will block until it gets an answer
either way. Do all the PTR records for your IP addresses on the machine in
q
Hi everyone,
have the weird problem that not anyone of sendmail, newaliases nor mailq
returns (neither does any one of them return any error message or
output). This includes the call of "sendmail -bd -q30m" out of /etc/rc
(the same applies if I do this by hand), so I have to hit ^C to continue
t
10 matches
Mail list logo
