No Subject

2001-09-06 Thread Nick Martens
subscribe freebsd-stable To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message

Re: Vinum vs. hardware RAID (was: RAID5)

2001-09-06 Thread Drew Derbyshire
- Original Message - From: Gerd Knops [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: FreeBSD-Stable [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 8:00 PM Subject: Re: Vinum vs. hardware RAID (was: RAID5) Jim C. Nasby wrote: On the same vein, is booting off of vinum in the

Ports and process

2001-09-06 Thread Vlad Gagarin
How can i determine which process opens particular port. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message

Re: Ports and process

2001-09-06 Thread Sergey A. Osokin
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 05:35:30PM +0400, Vlad Gagarin wrote: How can i determine which process opens particular port. sockstat or /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof is your friends :) -- Rgdz,/\ Sergey Osokin aka oZZ, \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN [EMAIL

RE: Ports and process

2001-09-06 Thread Yonatan Bokovza
-Original Message- From: Vlad Gagarin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 16:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ports and process How can i determine which process opens particular port. sockstat(1) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: Audio problem in 4.4-RC3

2001-09-06 Thread Jose M. Alcaide
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 09:30:06AM -0400, Christopher M. Giordano wrote: Playing .wav files using waveplay port - the majority of the file plays normally, except the ending is clipped off. Similar results using the wavplay port (the one with no e in wave). This started happening after the

compiling errors on new install

2001-09-06 Thread Nick Martens
I've just installed FreeBSD 4.1, synced with the freebsd-stable using cvsup but when i do a `make world` I get the following error: building static perl library ranlib libperl.a sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 libperl.a /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib cd

Re: Vinum vs. hardware RAID (was: RAID5)

2001-09-06 Thread Fernan Aguero
+[ Adrian Wontroba ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) dijo sobre Re: Vinum vs. hardware RAID (was: +RAID5): | | Disks are cheap, and capacities constantly expand. Correction: IDE disks are cheap. | Backup devices and media are expensive, wear out, and if they were big | enough when you bought them, soon

Re: NAT with 1 public interface still not working

2001-09-06 Thread Kenneth W Cochran
Hey, thanks... ( for your previous message a couple of days ago, too, but I've been having email troubles.) But it still doesn't work, i.e. no change from previous behavior. As a test/example, traceroute from the private machine to anywhere outside stops at the gateway machine. This *has* to

latest pcic changes

2001-09-06 Thread Allen Landsidel
Seeing the messages about 4.4 about to go -REL and some more changes to the pccard code, I thought I'd update it and give it another try. Warner.. was the hang-fixing patch you posted here put into cvs, or should I find it and apply it myself before building the kernel? Summary of problems

Re: NAT with 1 public interface still not working

2001-09-06 Thread fallous
the IP you get from dhcp, assuming that fxp0 and ppp0 use the same IP, but fxp0 is outbound only and ppp0 is inbound only. if it's doing something funky like using a different IP for each interface, then life is going to get more interesting should still be doable. On Thursday 06 September

Re: mount madness

2001-09-06 Thread fallous
I'm not sure I've ever run into fat32x before, and I've mounted fat32 partitions created under win98 that were 30G under freebsd just fine. On Thursday 06 September 2001 01:04 pm, Robin P. Blanchard wrote: after much wailing and gnashing of teeth i've figured out what the problem is. i

Re: mount madness

2001-09-06 Thread jacks
Perhaps go into Win2K and convert the HD from Fat32 to NTFS under Disk Management tools. then maybe FreeBSD can see it At 04:04 PM 9.6.2001 -0400, Robin P. Blanchard wrote: after much wailing and gnashing of teeth i've figured out what the problem is. i wasn't doing anything wrong. the

Re: panic: vm_page_remove(): page not found in hash

2001-09-06 Thread Matt Dillon
:On a FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE #0: Tue Jul 10 12:20:42 EDT 2001, I was trying to :do a buildworld when the box did a :panic: vm_page_remove(): page not found in hash :... Hmmm, tried it again, and same results. I had a look through the :archives and someone was seeing this on a SMP machine back in

Re: Where did /etc/issue go from telnetd? (fwd)

2001-09-06 Thread Oliver Fromme
Alexander Goller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 08:03:51PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: But the strange thing is, it still doesn't work. I have no idea why. Ack, but: the telnetd you have installed (probably) is crypto/telnet/telnetd which doesn't behave the same

Re: 4.4 will be delayed until Saturday, the 8th of September

2001-09-06 Thread Nik Clayton
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 09:48:30AM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: What length of time would you prefer? I'd say at least a week. As various others have pointed out, it's going to be at least 24-48 hours before interested parties have pulled down ISOs from mirrors, burnt CDs, and installed from

pkg_add doesn't work in jail

2001-09-06 Thread Oliver Fromme
Hi, On a 4-stable box, I can't seem to use pkg_add within a jail. # pwd /tmp # ls *.tgz zsh-3.0.8.tar.gz # pkg_add *.tgz can't stat package file '/usr/jail/000/tmp/zsh-3.0.8.tar.gz' I think I've tracked it down to the __getcwd() syscall, which seems to return the absolute path without caring

Re: 4.4 will be delayed until Saturday, the 8th of September

2001-09-06 Thread Jordan Hubbard
Well, there does appear to be a lot of general feeling that we should wait, so how would people feel about a push-back to the 14th? That would put it out next Friday. I'm kinda loath to keep shoving the release date forward since eventually people will start to wonder whether or not 4.4 is

Re: 4.4 will be delayed until Saturday, the 8th of September

2001-09-06 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 02:57 PM 9/6/2001 -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: Well, there does appear to be a lot of general feeling that we should wait, so how would people feel about a push-back to the 14th? That Yes, I think thats a good idea. I really do want to install / test the ISO image, but less than a 1 day