Do you have old style "device ata0 at ..." and "device ata1 at ..." and
new style "device ata" in your kernel config?
I have just "device ata" in my config file.
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
:
:On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:> The simplified version of the maxusers auto-sizing has been MFCd but
:> people need to be aware that to use it you need to update your kernel
:> source AND recompile /usr/src/usr.sbin/config.
:
:So will the following sequence be ok?
:make buildwo
* Nuno Teixeira ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> - why not integrate portupgrade with the main FreeBSD tree?
The main tree wants to be small; it's installed on all machines, from
little gateways sitting in the corner and *just* fitting on the drive,
to big-ass servers. Many of these machines
[replies sent directly to me may bounce, since I'm not online as often
as I should be, but I will check the list archives... sorry]
Moin moin
Is there a good reason why the makefile in 4.4-STABLE should not
have the following patch applied, other than that it's from
5.0-current and could crash
Hey,
I think it'd be a good idea to have a ports-all-eng distribution, since I
don't install the foreign language ports. It'd be easier than commenting
out all the languages individually.
- Will
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of th
Hi,
Yes, you right. The same happens with other powerfull tool: cvsup.
For a long time that I use cvsup port and I never had the same idea like this
one related to portupgrade.
Well, let's use the port!
Thanks very much,
Nuno Teixeira
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 01:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> The simplified version of the maxusers auto-sizing has been MFCd but
> people need to be aware that to use it you need to update your kernel
> source AND recompile /usr/src/usr.sbin/config.
So will the following sequence be ok?
make buildworld
make in
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:08:02AM +, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> Portupgrade is a powerfull tool and I'd like to make the
> following question:
> - why not integrate portupgrade with the main FreeBSD tree?
>
[..]
>
> I'm not a programmer to talk about Ruby or other language, but I
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joe Abley writes:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 03:29:53PM -0500, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> > For one thing -CURRENT no longer
> > supports the 80386.
>
> You mean "the GENERIC kernel shipped with -curent-derived releases
> no longer supports the 80386", right?
Ye
Hello to all,
Portupgrade is a powerfull tool and I'd like to make the
following question:
- why not integrate portupgrade with the main FreeBSD tree?
Well, I read FreeBSD handbook faq and it says:
"(...) Since it is written in Ruby, portupgrade is an unlikely candid
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Joe Abley wrote:
> You mean "the GENERIC kernel shipped with -curent-derived releases
> no longer supports the 80386", right?
Yiz:
http://people.freebsd.org/~bmah/relnotes/CURRENT/relnotes-i386.html#AEN263
--
Juha
Take off every sig!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EM
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 03:29:53PM -0500, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> For one thing -CURRENT no longer
> supports the 80386.
You mean "the GENERIC kernel shipped with -curent-derived releases
no longer supports the 80386", right?
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsub
I noticed this fixes my problem, but I don't know this patch is
logically correct or not.
I think we should commit this before 4.5-RELEASE if this is correct
way. Can someone comment this?
At Thu, 22 Nov 2001 08:47:09 + (UTC),
Keiichi SHIMA / 島慶一 wrote:
> fxp_stop() of the latest
> On 18 Dec 2001, Chynnee wrote:
>
> > problem:
> > i was trying to get NFS working.
> > and nfsd starts w/o issue, but mountd gives:
> > "Cannot register service: RPC: Timed out"
> > after a few min of trying.
>
> You are using rc.conf to enable these, correct? Is 'localhost' defined in
> /etc/
14 matches
Mail list logo
