Re: RELENG_4_? Branch Terminology

2002-01-30 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Christopher Schulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : 4.4-RELEASEp1 would be the 1st commit to RELENG_4_4 (aka the security : branch) after RELENG_4_4_0_RELEASE (4.4-RELEASE). commit here is subjective. Sometimes it can be multiple events that comprise a

Microtech USB6SCSI Cable - working well ?

2002-01-30 Thread Joel CARNAT
Hi, I'm planning to buy the Microtech USB-SCSI Cable (http://www.microtechint.com/qs-usbscsi.html). I've seen the ref in usbdevs source code * product MICROTECH SCSIDB25 0x0004 USB-SCSI-DB25 product MICROTECH SCSIHD50 0x0005 USB-SCSI-HD50 * Questions

Re: *_enable=YES behavior is bogus

2002-01-30 Thread Michael Smith
If you build a kernel without INET, the following switches don't result in any daemons being started if you set them to YES: syslog_enable sendmail_enable lpd_enable I think you are confused. These will all start regardless of whether INET is enabled. These are all things that are

Re[2]: Strange lock-ups during backup over nfs after adding 1024M RAM

2002-01-30 Thread Sergey Gershtein
On Wednesday, January 30, 2002 Peter Jeremy wrote: PJ Compile and run a kernel with options DDB. When it locks up, use PJ Ctrl-Alt-Esc to enter DDB and try ps - this will tell you what PJ processes are running/blocked. (Read ddb(4) for more details). I did that, started backup and when the

Re: Microtech USB6SCSI Cable - working well ?

2002-01-30 Thread Pete French
- what would be the diff between the DB25 (female) and the HD50 (male) version ? I mean, is there a HD50 is the normal standard SCSI-2 connector (narrow). A very few manufacturers (Apple being the main culprit) put 25 way D connectors on the back of SCSI kit for reasons best known to

Re: FreeBSD subscription

2002-01-30 Thread Thomas Zenker
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 03:57:26AM +0100, Gunnar Flygt wrote: I've been subscribing to FreeBSD since 2.2.2 (Walnut Creek) over BSDi and Wind River. I think I followed the pace to reorder the forthcoming 4.5-RELEASE from the latest company. I have though forgotten which company it is, and what

Dangerous before networking is turned on (Was: Proposed Solution To Recent firewall_enable Thread.) Read]

2002-01-30 Thread Mike Meyer
Garance A Drosihn [EMAIL PROTECTED] types: At 12:28 AM -0500 1/31/02, Garance A Drosihn wrote: Why should only Joe Experienced User be getting the benefit of booting up with the firewall active? Now, I am *definitely* not suggesting this for -stable, but why don't we have the default

Re: *_enable=YES behavior is bogus

2002-01-30 Thread Paul Fardy
On Wednesday, January 30, 2002, at 11:40 PM, Mark Woodson wrote: I don't feel that the current system needs changing. It's my thought that if you go to the extra trouble of compiling ipfw or ipf into the kernel, then you want it and you get it. No matter what you've set in rc. conf. I

Re: *_enable=YES behavior is bogus

2002-01-30 Thread Mike Meyer
[Replies pointed to -current, where this is relevant.] Paul Fardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] types: When the rc.conf file includes foo_enable=NO it's right to expect that the system will operate like a system that does not have foo installed. So you think that if I install a syslog from