Re: panic on 4.5-RELEASE

Yes, yes, following up to my own post and all that... It appears that it may have been bad RAM. I have swapped out the RAM on the machine with the new disk and have not seen the problem. If I see it again, I'll send out a new report. -jan- -- Jan L. Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> T

Re: Partnership Proposal

Forward it to the following address: "Nigeria Scam Task Force" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> They have a task force to deal with these idiots. Mind you, some people who have resonded to their adds have lost their entire life savings. Some that went to Nigeria dissapeared. Go get 'e

Re: Partnership Proposal

On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > Mmm..on a boring day I once replied very seriously to one of these > scams. I offered to help if they deposited US$10,000 on my bank i too answered once, sending them the name of a company, purpotedly to be registered in my name, yada yada yada. str

Re: Java for FreeBSD

Michael Nottebrock wrote: > Andrew Reilly wrote: > >> I'm a little disappointed that it didn't actually solve the >> problem that I wanted solved: Java in a native web browser. I >> had hoped that the build process for either mozilla or galeon >> would have noticed the working jvm and done somet

SIS645 chipset support

hi stable, hope this is the right list. just bought a new mobo for my bsd box, but the chipset is not reported that well in dmesg. i don't have any problems at all, even in X/KDE3. attached is my dmesg and pciconf result. thanks __ Do You Yahoo!

Re: ATA raid panic

John wrote: > > Hi, > >Running a 4.5-STABLE from today (2Feb2002 11am EST), with > > options INVARIANTS > options INVARIANT_SUPPORT > >added to the config file, trying to mount an ataraid volume > panics the kernel. This does not happen if the INVARIANTS > options are

Re: usb CanonScan 650U

> I noticed the yesterday built 4.5-stable reconized my CanoScan usb > scanner, it shew up as uscanner0 from `dmesg`. But sane-find-scanner > doesn't now the type of my scanner still. I cheched the > /sys/dev/usb/uscanner.c and only found 656U, has anyone get it worked > for 650U? Looking at

Re: Partnership Proposal

> You know, I tried to forward this to the FBI, but apparently the hojillions > in tax $$ we give the US government every year isn't enough to allow > the FBI to have a mail server that actually works. Yeah, and the US Secret Service's web site on the topic has borken Java$cript that doesn't wo

Re: Suggestion on natd rc scripts

> I suggest that natd_interface="" be in the defaults. If you add > natd_enable=yes to your rc.conf, it is then your responsibility to set > natd_flags and/or natd_interface to something that will work for you. > > In rc.network, if natd_enable is Yes, then it validates that either (or > both) o

Initio chipset based SCSI controllers -- include drivers into -stable?

Hello, I recently got a stack of initio based SCSI adapters, and after some research found drivers on their webpage which make the adapter work on -stable. It is located at http://www.initio.com/drivers/bsd4source.zip Minor modification to the README file would be to use "device" instead of "co

usb CanonScan 650U

Hello All, I noticed the yesterday built 4.5-stable reconized my CanoScan usb scanner, it shew up as uscanner0 from `dmesg`. But sane-find-scanner doesn't now the type of my scanner still. I cheched the /sys/dev/usb/uscanner.c and only found 656U, has anyone get it worked for 650U? Regards, Che

Re: 4-stable, sendmail, and named-authoritative zones

Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 21:20:32, marck (Dmitry Morozovsky) wrote about "4-stable, sendmail, and named-authoritative zones": What `sendmail -d8.8,21.12 -bv [EMAIL PROTECTED]' says? And whether `echo \$=w | sendmail -bt' says unallowed names? > There is 4-stable machine with system-default named

Re: Sendmail broken after upgrade 4.4-RELEASE to 4.5-STABLE

Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 22:12:08, mailing (Rick Hoppe) wrote about "Sendmail broken after upgrade 4.4-RELEASE to 4.5-STABLE": > Feb 14 21:30:00 ns1 sendmail[105]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): Warning: .cf > version level (10) exceeds sendmail version 8.11.6 functionality (9) > > Some time ago I alread

Re: Suggestion on natd rc scripts

>> I ran into exactly this same situation a couple weeks ago, and was outraged >> by the fact that 1) fxp0 was hard-coded in a defaults file, and 2) the rc >> files won't start natd without the interface being specified on the command >> line. >> > Well, *something* needs to be hard-coded in the