On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 08:37:14PM -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> Is there support somewhere for the high-end Intel (fxp) server optimized
> network cards? This one I have has the Intel i960 chip, the model number
> might be 687231-006.
>
> I ask because the lastest FreeBSD 4.5 snapshot insta
Is there support somewhere for the high-end Intel (fxp) server optimized
network cards? This one I have has the Intel i960 chip, the model number
might be 687231-006.
I ask because the lastest FreeBSD 4.5 snapshot installation did not pick up
this card, so I used a lower-end 3com.
Thanks.
I just changed my longtime Amanda server from BSDI to FBSD 4.4-Stable and
I'm not sure if I'm using the correct tape device.
Here's what dmesg shows:
sa0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0
sa0: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-3 device
sa0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 32, 16bit)
So for t
Craig Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You want stability *AND* bleeding edge features? How about a potion of
> immortaility while we're at it? (only joking, of course)
Heh. The struggle for perfection rarely implies that absolute
perfection will be achieved. This does not mean I will refrai
Alessandro de Manzano wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I would ask you all about the status of ATA subsystem in -STABLE after
> recent commits and MFCs.
>
> I read of various problems, going from kernel panics to I/O errors,
> etc.
>
> Since I would update my 4.5-stable systems in the next days and they
> This is true. However, stability is an issue AND I also want the newer
> things in -STABLE, like sendmail 8.12 (ducks), and even Soren's ATA
> based cdrecord so I can finally burn CDs on my arbitrary CDRW drive
> here.
You want stability *AND* bleeding edge features? How about a potion of
immo
At 03:43 PM 4/1/2002 -0800, Dave Hayes wrote:
>So I believe the properly phrased questions are
>
>a) "What is the stability status of the current changes to the ATA
>subsystem in -STABLE?".
I have it running on a number of machines with good results. Controllers I
have it on are
atapci0: port
just in case anyone is tracking this ...
add to the trail of unsucessful attemtps to
upgrade 4.5r->4.5s, a build based on apr 1 2002
cvs
(which included several new files relating to ata
and raid)
same results
if anybody has a clue-x-four I can apply to myself or
this mb, more than willing to
otterr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If stability is an issue, maybe you should look into RELENG_4_5 for only
> fixes since -RELEASE.
This is true. However, stability is an issue AND I also want the newer
things in -STABLE, like sendmail 8.12 (ducks), and even Soren's ATA
based cdrecord so I can
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
10 matches
Mail list logo
