On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 12:51:49AM -0300, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-04-24 at 00:04, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This ought to save me grief++, thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I tried to update `gnomecanvas' and it died not finding libintl.a
> > > >
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:27:17 +0200 (CEST)
Richard Arends <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RA> Hello,
RA>
RA> Makeworld stops with the following error. Does somebody know what this
RA> means and how to solve it???
Remove /usr/obj and try the buildworld(1) again. If this doesn't
work then updat
Hello,
I posted a bug report about this but haven't heard anything
back. I'll post here instead. =)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=37240
I have a Intel EtherExpress 16 that will not probe on boot, or with
a custom kernel. However, under 3.4R it does find it. I'm
just switching b
[Replies have been pointed to -hackers to get this off of -stable.]
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, The Anarcat
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> On Wed Apr 24, 2002 at 12:17:37AM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, The Anarcat
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > > On Tue Apr 23, 2002 at 11:07:
Le Mercredi 24 avril 2002, à 11:12 , Mike Meyer a écrit :
> [Replies have been pointed to -hackers to get this off of -stable.]
[taken to libh]
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, The Anarcat
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
>> On Wed Apr 24, 2002 at 12:17:37AM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
>>> In <[EMAIL PROTE
Charlie Watts wrote:
>
> I have a machine I want to upgrade from 3.3-RELEASE to 4-STABLE.
> UPDATING seems to indicate I can jump all the way to 4-STABLE, but I
> know folks have recommended a center step.
[...]
> How about if I have another -STABLE box that I can do the installworld
> from. Can
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
typed:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Philip J. Koenig wrote:
> > Yes, but the problem I usually have is twofold: I usually run
> > mergemaster in single-user mode,
> You don't have to do that. Nothing you install in /etc (except
> hosts.allow
If memory serves me right, "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote:
> How about a Changelog? NOTES (HEAD) and UPDATING in /usr/src are one
> way, but a semi-automatic way of making changes transparent to the
> administrator would be a good start, i think.
How is this different from the release notes?
src/r
On Wed Apr 24, 2002 at 12:17:37AM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, The Anarcat
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > On Tue Apr 23, 2002 at 11:07:18PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, The Anarcat
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > > > The main issues I see about pa
Doug Barton([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.04.23 21:58:34 +:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, JJ Behrens wrote:
>
> > I strongly disagree with your disagreement of his disagreement :)) Citing
> > /etc/defaults/rc.conf once more:
> >
> > # The ${rc_conf_files} files should only contain values which override
>
I have a machine I want to upgrade from 3.3-RELEASE to 4-STABLE. UPDATING
seems to indicate I can jump all the way to 4-STABLE, but I know folks
have recommended a center step.
If I'm hosting the compile on that box, what are the "stopover points"
that should be hit on the way?
Should I go to RE
David Schultz wrote:
> Thus spake Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Writing a useful (non-"fluff") technical book, optimistically,
> > takes 2080 hours ... or 40 hours per week for 52 weeks... a man
> > year.
> >
> > By the time you are done, the book is a year out of date, and
> > even if yo
12 matches
Mail list logo
