>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html
>
I've looked for that like 5 different times. I must be blind.
Thanks,
Dean
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Dean Cookson wrote:
DC> > In my supfile is "RELENG_4"
DC> >
DC> > After cvsup and make world, uname returns:
DC> >
DC> > FreeBSD hostname 4.6-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE #0: Tue May 7
DC> > 12:35:49 EDT 2002
DC> >
DC> > Is there a reason why this happened? I was expecti
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 01:45:44PM -0400, Dean Cookson wrote:
> > Yesterday I wanted to cvsup to stable and make world.
> >
> > In my supfile is "RELENG_4"
> >
> > After cvsup and make world, uname returns:
> >
> > FreeBSD hostname 4.6-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE #0: Tue May 7
> > 12:35
R. David Murray wrote:
> On Mon, 6 May 2002, Ian wrote:
>
>>What changed is that the code now enforces that you do it the right way,
>>which is to use 255.255.255.255 as the netmask for the alias IPs. That is,
>>use the normal/proper netmask for the primary IP for that NIC, then use
>>255.255.25
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 01:43:04PM -0400, John Von Essen wrote:
> Yesterday I wanted to cvsup to stable and make world.
>
> In my supfile is "RELENG_4"
>
> After cvsup and make world, uname returns:
>
> FreeBSD hostname 4.6-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE #0: Tue May 7
> 12:35:49 EDT 2002
>
> Yesterday I wanted to cvsup to stable and make world.
>
> In my supfile is "RELENG_4"
>
> After cvsup and make world, uname returns:
>
> FreeBSD hostname 4.6-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE #0: Tue May 7
> 12:35:49 EDT 2002
>
> Is there a reason why this happened? I was expecting and wan
Yesterday I wanted to cvsup to stable and make world.
In my supfile is "RELENG_4"
After cvsup and make world, uname returns:
FreeBSD hostname 4.6-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE #0: Tue May 7
12:35:49 EDT 2002
Is there a reason why this happened? I was expecting and wanting
4.5-STABLE.
-
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Ian wrote:
> What changed is that the code now enforces that you do it the right way,
> which is to use 255.255.255.255 as the netmask for the alias IPs. That is,
> use the normal/proper netmask for the primary IP for that NIC, then use
> 255.255.255.255 for any alias IPs on t
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 04:54:47AM -0700, Daniel Rudy wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've been experiancing a problem as of late. It seems that make
> > buildworld fails when compiling the miniperl module. Here is the text
> > of the failure:
> >
> > cc -O -pipe -I/u
At 10:43 AM 07/05/2002 -0600, Ian wrote:
>Add the following to your /etc/make.conf
>
> SENDMAIL_CFLAGS= -UNETINET6
Excellent! Thanks, I didnt know about that form.
>Of course, that's a literal answer to the question you asked, and doesn't
>imply that you should discount anything Gregory is s
>
> Is there a way to modify the sendmail build process via /etc/make.conf so
> that -DNETINET6 is always removed ?
>
> i.e.
> CFLAGS+= ${DBMDEF} ${NIS} -DMILTER -DNETINET6 -DTCPWRAPPERS ${MAPS}
> is
> CFLAGS+= ${DBMDEF} ${NIS} -DMILTER -DTCPWRAPPERS ${MAPS}
>
> Other than getting all the bro
mike> May 7 00:04:35 granite sm-mta[61324]: g4740ZLu061324:
mike> ruleset=check_mail, arg1=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
mike> relay=smtp2.sentex.ca [199.212.134.9], reject=451 4.1.8 Domain of
mike> sender address [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve
mike> I have (had)
mike> define(`confBIND_OPTS', `+WorkA
At 09:31 AM 07/05/2002 -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
>mike> At 09:20 AM 07/05/2002 -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> >> want to excuse this behavior, include WorkAroundBroken in
>
>mike> I had been using that, but it does not seem to work. e.g. the domain
>mike> region.peel.on.ca
>
>Ho
13 matches
Mail list logo
