> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Johnson
> Sent: Sunday 9 June 2002 11:58pm
> To: Danny Horne
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Curious about release schedule
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 11:53:03PM +0100, Danny Horne wrote
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 11:53:03PM +0100, Danny Horne wrote:
> Apologies if this isn't the right group, but I'm curious as to why there's a
> version 4.8 of FreeBSD being released more than 2 months after version 5 has
> been released.
4.8 has not been released, and neither has 5. 4.6 is about to
So far, I have six ways of configuring your input//pointer /dev.
I'd like at least 20 more before getting together a publishable
list. So if any other BSD users want to contribute, please cut
and paste the Input|Pointer Section from your XF86Config and
if you are running m
Hi all,
Apologies if this isn't the right group, but I'm curious as to why there's a
version 4.8 of FreeBSD being released more than 2 months after version 5 has
been released.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.370 /
Hello.
I have seen a few threads with regards to having a problem with
ATAPI cdroms, on 4.6.rcx, and I also have the same problems..
I have several different hardware configurations that I have tested this
with, as well as versions..
4.5 was the last version that worked across the board..
4.6 RC2
thank you, looking forward for this patch.
---
Vlad
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 12:41:43PM -0500, David Syphers wrote:
> On Saturday 08 June 2002 03:42 pm, Mikko Tyolajarvi wrote:
> > In local.freebsd.stable you write:
> >
> > >FreeBSD ariel.phys.wesleyan.edu 4.6-RC FreeBSD 4.6-RC #32: Wed May 29
>
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 09:09:12AM -0600, Ian wrote:
> On 06/09/02 01:29, Gary D Kline wrote:
>
> >
> > Having sweated thru 2+ days withmy switch, I believe ever word!
> > But:: how old is your KVM switch? If it has a PS/2 port only,
> > you should try
> >
> > Protocol "Auto"
> >
> > in the
On 2002-06-09 20:23:25, Ruben de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 10:47:47AM -0600, Korey Pelton typed:
> > Yesterday evening, I exchanged the line "*default tag=RELENG_4_5" with
> > "*default tag=RELENG_4_6" and cvsup looked like it added a bunch of
> > stuff, so I ass
as far as i have found in the archives 4.x doesnt support if alias in jails.
is current already to be used on a production box where this is needed? want
to avoid to setup 5 jails to have the needed 5 IPs?
--
--
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen,
Karl M. Joch
http://www.freebsd.at - Power
At 10:47 AM 6/9/2002 -0600, Korey Pelton wrote:
>Carl,
>
>Yesterday evening, I exchanged the line "*default tag=RELENG_4_5" with
>"*default tag=RELENG_4_6" and cvsup looked like it added a bunch of
>stuff, so I assume 4.6 is good to go. I am a newbie, so if anything I say
>sounds rediculous,
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 10:47:47AM -0600, Korey Pelton typed:
> Carl,
>
> Yesterday evening, I exchanged the line "*default tag=RELENG_4_5" with
> "*default tag=RELENG_4_6" and cvsup looked like it added a bunch of stuff,
> so I assume 4.6 is good to go. I am a newbie, so if anything I say s
:
:
:Hi Matt,
:
:> I'm still playing with this. Actually, I'm still playing with this
:> for the first time! I started building the port on my workstation
:> yesterday afternoon and, well, it's *still* building 24 hours later!
:> Holy cow!
:
:Hehe.
:
:It takes 6 hours here with
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Alessandro de Manzano wrote:
[snip a bit]
AdM> > Well, next thougt: maybe it's kinda chicken'n'egg problem: if you have
AdM> > build machine, made there a buildworld, and then export both /usr/src and
AdM> > /usr/obj via read-only NFS, you have exactly the same problem...
AdM
14 matches
Mail list logo
