At 2002-07-11T03:33:44Z, Nick Sayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a desktop machine with an Asus A7V133 motherboard. It's based
> around the VIA KT133A chipset. I tend to have a lot more problems with USB
> devices (under FreeBSD) on these controllers than with, say, my Vaio
> laptop, whi
On Thursday 11 July 2002 16:50, Chip Marshall wrote:
> I had problems with my Gigabyte GA-7VTXE (also KT133A based) where USB
> devices during boot would be detected fine, and one device after boot
> would work, but after that, nothing.
Isn't that motherboard KT266A-based? I have the exact same m
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Roelof Osinga thusly...
>
> cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls
> -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
> -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I-
> -I. -I@
On Jul 7, at 1:44pm -0700, John Polstra wrote:
> > I see this problem with HZ=1000, overflow doesn't occured in this
> > situation... May be problem lies somewhere else?
>
> Are you sure? I changed the type of sb_timeo to int and the problem
> disappeared on my system.
You are right - this is j
Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
> & that's "Lords" ... egads, howe much
> mye speling and typeing lacketh accurasy!!
> Faugh!!
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:09 PM
> Subj
On July 10, 2002, Nick Sayer sent me the following:
> I have a desktop machine with an Asus A7V133 motherboard. It's based
> around the VIA KT133A chipset. I tend to have a lot more problems with
> USB devices (under FreeBSD) on these controllers than with, say, my Vaio
> laptop, which purports
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 20:33, Nick Sayer wrote:
> I have a desktop machine with an Asus A7V133 motherboard. It's based
> around the VIA KT133A chipset. I tend to have a lot more problems with
> USB devices (under FreeBSD) on these controllers than with, say, my Vaio
> laptop, which purports to b
subscribe freebsd-stable
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
I have a desktop machine with an Asus A7V133 motherboard. It's based
around the VIA KT133A chipset. I tend to have a lot more problems with
USB devices (under FreeBSD) on these controllers than with, say, my Vaio
laptop, which purports to be based on the Intel 440 BX chipset (with a
PIIX4 USB
& that's "Lords" ... egads, howe much
mye speling and typeing lacketh accurasy!!
Faugh!!
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:09 PM
Subject: Ye Olde "Show Stopper"
> To Ye Lord of -STABLE:
To Ye Lord of -STABLE:
I failed 3 times to make buildkernel after
cvsuping RELENG_4, July 9th at
CDT US.
Turns out, I'd never built -STABLE on this
particular host which was still running
4.5 patched (it's way back on the backline,
doing only internal stuff)
Anyway, after a bit of rea
There seems to be a conflict in the 'sshd' user of FreeBSD's built in sshd
and the ports version.
passwd diffs:
12a13
> sshd:(password):22:22::0:0:Secure Shell Daemon:/var/empty:/sbin/nologin
21d21
< sshd:(password):22:22::0:0:sshd privilege
separation:/usr/local/empty:/nonexistent
IMHO: This is
On Tue, 09 Jul 2002 23:51:08 -0400
Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Works correctly in what sense ? i.e. you can read and write to it under
> some OS ? But not on this version of FreeBSD ?
Yes, I tested the drive under FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE and 4.5-STABLE (before new ATA
drivers)
and
Hello,
Does anyone is running FreeBSD stable in SMP mode on a motherboard
_without_ any I/O Ints entry with type ExtINT (mptable output)?
I'm suspercting that my kernel freeze at boot come from:
APIC_IO: routing 8254 via IOAPIC #0 intpin 0
My PR is:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=i3
Guys,
The subject describes it all. I don't know if anyone else is facing this
problem, but I can reproduce this problem at will. Under VMware 3.1.1
for Windows, the lnc driver will stop responding after some time. The
weirdest part is that it will only manifest itself when doing some heavy
netwo
"Andrew P. Lentvorski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If OpenSSH did a proper "attempt version 2(fail) -> attempt version
> 1(succeed)" fallback, your original users *would* be able to get in
> *without* change. This fact that this does not occur really is a
> bug/misfeature of OpenSSH.
No, it's
faSty wrote:
> ah you says so. I did it on one of my rack DNS server. I managed get
> kernel compiled without any error. sorry i tried help you anyway.
Oh no, don't be. Any help is always welcome!
But I did notice one thing and that is that the good compiles were done just
after the 2002.07.05 c
Hi,
I have a patch that allow to use CD-ROM images in VMware2 via vn device:
http://sysoev.ru/freebsd/patch.vn_cd.txt
Patch was made and tested on FreeBSD 4.2 and 4.3.
I had used it to install Windows NT 4.0 from CD-ROM image in VMware2.
It can be used on FreeBSD 4.x only (because it's using vn
Dear Sirs.
I followed an interesting dispute in this list about setting
the kernel option HZ=100 to HZ=1.
No one can say exactly what kind of hardware is 'fast enough' to
obtain benefits from setting this granularity option to that high value,
so each administrator has to do several efforts
ah you says so. I did it on one of my rack DNS server. I managed get
kernel compiled without any error. sorry i tried help you anyway.
-fasty
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:25:52AM +0200, Roelof Osinga wrote:
> faSty wrote:
> >no no you need clean up in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/NISSER (type make
> > Sure - the newest security fixes go into the release as
> well, but why
> > not Matt's most recent bug fixes?
>
> Why not include OpenSSL 0.96d, ipfw2, gcc 3.1 and while we're at it
> everyone else's pet software? Where would you draw the line? IMO,
> 4.6.1 s/b a point patch release.
Hi...
I noticed that upgrade of the version of the OpenSSH for 3.4p1 was made one
when cvs for RELENG_4 is made.
It adds a new user and a new group with the name of sshd. Which would be the
function of it? To twirl sshd with the user sshd instead of the user root?
Case is because for default it
Hi...
I noticed that upgrade of the version of the OpenSSH for 3.4p1 was made one
when cvs for RELENG_4 is made.
It adds a new user and a new group with the name of sshd. Which would be the
funcão of it? To twirl sshd with the user sshd instead of the user root?
Case is because for default it do
faSty wrote:
> no no you need clean up in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/NISSER (type make clean)
> then cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf and config NISSER then cd ../../compile/NISSER
> lastly make depend
Make absolutely no difference whatsoever. Still get stuck on that linux code. But
how the heck it ever
Doug Barton wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
>
> > ET> The only problem is that those diagnostics from 'rm' might be a bit
> > ET> misleading and/or annoying but everything works fine.
>
> I think that you guys are running an old mergemaster on a new -stable
> system. Can
25 matches
Mail list logo
