hmm yeah i didn't think about that.. i guess i'll leave it.. I had 'No' in
the rc.conf didn't realize there was a difference between none and no..
thought it was a yes/no question :)
thanx for the help
- Original Message -
From: Gregory Neil Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Artis Caune
Charles Sprickman([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.09.04 14:27:40 +:
Hi,
Can anyone help me figure out how to bring part of my source tree into the
past? I'd like to see if I can run a -stable box with the old ata
code that doesn't panic. And if anyone knows a specific date when the
big
* Gregory Neil Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-04 09:39 -0700]:
ac-freebsd [deleting all sendmail files]
This will of course break your system.. No more periodic reports
(daily security reports), no more cron mail, no more user mail, etc.
Not if you install a different MTA like Postfix
I recently rebuilt the world on my pII 400 system, and here is how long it
took me.
/usr/bin/time make installworld
266.34 real74.23 user43.33 sys
/usr/bin/time make installkernel
26.11 real 6.89 user 2.38 sys
So it took about 4.8 minutes to install
This will of course break your system.. No more periodic reports
(daily security reports), no more cron mail, no more user mail, etc.
haering_linux Not if you install a different MTA like Postfix instead.
He was removing /usr/bin/mail and mailx.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
Hi,
I'm working with a box that is apparently running out of mbufs:
looutput: mbuf allocation failed
looutput: mbuf allocation failed
All mbuf clusters exhausted, please see tuning(7).
Looking at netstat -m, I get the following:
144/9472/26624 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
134
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Charles Sprickman wrote:
What is the difference between the mbufs in use line and the mbuf
clusters in use line?
I've wondered precisely this; perhaps one specifically relates to the
network? The farthest I got was netstat(1), which points to a nonexistant
mbuf(9).
Later,
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:47:58PM -0700, Mike Hoskins wrote:
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Charles Sprickman wrote:
What is the difference between the mbufs in use line and the mbuf
clusters in use line?
An mbuf is a fixed length structure which contains network data.
An mbuf cluster is associated
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Dominic Marks wrote:
DM An mbuf is a fixed length structure which contains network data.
DM
DM An mbuf cluster is associated with an area of memory which is used for
DM storing more data than you can fit in a single mbuf.
DM
DM According the DI 4.4 an mbuf is 128 bytes and
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 02:04:05AM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Dominic Marks wrote:
DM An mbuf is a fixed length structure which contains network data.
DM
DM An mbuf cluster is associated with an area of memory which is used for
DM storing more data than you can fit
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM AFAIK according to /usr/src/sys/*/param.h, mbuf size if 256 (at least for
DM i386, see /usr/src/sys/i386/include/param.h, and is not defined for
DM Alphas);
DM
DM and mbcluster size defaults to 2k (I suppose the smallest 2^x to
DM cover standard
I am an enthusiastic FreeBSD newbie, just smart enough to search for a
mailing list like this one. Would it be possible to make an exception to
the new .tbz format package policy for pkg_add itself (i.e. provide it
in .tgz format)? I suggest this in the hope that a painless and simple
upgrade
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Arnvid Karstad wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering a bit on how FreeBSD handled SMP systems where the cpu's
aint 100% .. We have an SMP system that runs fine on Linux 2.2, but not
2.4 and is a bit curious on how this would be able to run under BSD...
Its probably a part of
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 14:20 , Men gasped, women fainted, and small
children were reduced to tears as stable-digest confessed to all:
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 13:00:52 -0700
From: Gregory Neil Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Removing sendmail
This will of course break your system..
14 matches
Mail list logo
