On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 14:32, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> I'll go in to the data center tomorrow and check the cables and BIOS -- I'm
> sure they were okay.
>
> If this is a FreeBSD error (and I'm not certain yet) - what was your fix
> for this - will this cause problems with the system?
I ran atac
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 20:14, Jeff Seeman wrote:
> What exactly is the pro/cons to having a kernel of a particular size?
> for example is smaller really better when it comes to kernels?
Kernel memory is non-pagable, therefore smaller kernel equals more
memory available for other stuff.
If you are
> Le 2002-10-31, Andy Sparrow écrivait :
>
> > Yup, that's probably it. I just (re)patched my src tree after a fresh
> > cvsup, and this file fails to patch with atapicam-STABLE-config-20020820.
> > diff. Here's sys/conf/files.rej:
>
> A patch is not needed anymore: I have MFCd ATAPI/CAM on the
Le 2002-10-31, Andy Sparrow écrivait :
> Yup, that's probably it. I just (re)patched my src tree after a fresh
> cvsup, and this file fails to patch with atapicam-STABLE-config-20020820.
> diff. Here's sys/conf/files.rej:
A patch is not needed anymore: I have MFCd ATAPI/CAM on the RELENG_4
branc
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>
> On 2002-10-30 19:12, Chris Pressey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:41:49 +0200
> > Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > + Remove everything under /usr/obj.
> > >
> > > # chflags -R noschg /usr/obj
> > > # rm -fr /usr/obj/*
>
