Hello!
Last night I'd cvsuped my source tree to lastest -STABLE and this problem seems to
disappear.
ident if_fxp.c now shows v 1.110.2.27, vs old v 1.110.2.25.
Thank you.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Thus spake Mike Harding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Oh, I'm embarrased - the spelling got flushed from my cerebral cache,
> and of course google (as always) has plently of examples of the
> misspelled version.
That's why it says
Did you mean: /dmesg/ FreeBSD
;-)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
Hi,
I was upgrade my box with make world (FreeBSD STABLE), but some function
firewall doesn't work well, if I typed :
$ ipfw show
04086 11249850788085760 ip from any to any [opcode 0 len 0] [opcode 0 len 0] ...
What that's mean? and how to prepare without make stable and install new
kern
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, at 00:38 [=GMT-0500], Barney Wolff wrote:
> Just for the record, I wrote "... is evil" not the nonsense about OpenNIC.
> Please don't misattribute idiocy to me - my reputation is all I've got.
And that is that you have strong opinions and use strong words to
defend them in yo
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 08:58:32AM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote:
>Dear FreeBSD!
>Hope that someone on the list has
> expirience with external Zoltrix modem
> named Rainbow. It should change my
> nightmare: lucent winmodem. Maker
> has a lot of data about windows com-
> pability, but freeBSD is
Just for the record, I wrote "... is evil" not the nonsense about OpenNIC.
Please don't misattribute idiocy to me - my reputation is all I've got.
Barney Wolff
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:58:54PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Barney Wolff wrote:
> >
> > > And of cours
Dear FreeBSD!
Hope that someone on the list has
expirience with external Zoltrix modem
named Rainbow. It should change my
nightmare: lucent winmodem. Maker
has a lot of data about windows com-
pability, but freeBSD is not even men-
tioned. Should I buy it? (Modem on the
machine? Yes, gonna be
> On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Barney Wolff wrote:
>
> > And of course, using the "alternate" roots is evil.
>
> Why is that then? I'm slaving the OpenNIC ones here without any
> trouble. DNS just being an information service in the end I can't see
> why there has to be the only one of its type. In f
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Morning all ...
Today, I installed a new Intel server with a 2120s RAID controller in
it, with the 4.7-RELEASE CDs, only to find out afterwards that there is a
bug (known) in the driver causing it to TIMEOUT on reboot ... know, I know
that Scott knows about it, and is l
Morning all ...
Today, I installed a new Intel server with a 2120s RAID controller in
it, with the 4.7-RELEASE CDs, only to find out afterwards that there is a
bug (known) in the driver causing it to TIMEOUT on reboot ... know, I know
that Scott knows about it, and is looking into it, based on
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, at 20:45 [=GMT-0500], Barney Wolff wrote:
> Well! When ISC officially endorses this technique, by distributing
> bind with it set up as the default, I'll be pleased to change my mind.
> Until then, not.
Always best to only use default configurations. Never trust yourself!
-
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:57:24AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Firstly there is no proof that it will actually increase the load
> on the roots. It may well decrease the load. The analysis has not
> been done.
>
> Secondly it is more robust. You are no longer de
:On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, at 15:55 [=GMT-0800], Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:> #set hostname = 'ftp.alternic.net'
:> #set remfile = 'db.root'
:> #set locfile = 'db.root'
:> set hostname = 'ftp.rs.internic.net'
:> set remfile = domain/root.zone.gz
:> set locfile = root.zone.gz
:
:Did you at some time chang
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, William Palfreman wrote:
> So what is the great theoretical objection to multiple roots then?
We've already seen a conflict between the "official" roots and the
offshoots. What happens then? Anyone who registered a .biz in the fake
root is now somewhat screwed.
The second
14 matches
Mail list logo
