Hi,
I was wondering whether the GENERIC files (e.g. in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC)
are also updated when I cvsup the source-tree for building a new world and kernel.
Haven't seen any change to GENERIC so far.
I suppose for testing the new upcoming release, we should also verify whether
the
The entire message "How to generate and test GENERIC-STABLE kernel ?",
originally sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
([EMAIL PROTECTED]), has been forwarded to you from the
Antigen Quarantine area.
This message may have been re-scanned by Antigen and handled according to
the appropriate scan job's se
Hi,
I was wondering whether the GENERIC files (e.g. in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC)
are also updated when I cvsup the source-tree for building a new world and kernel.
Haven't seen any change to GENERIC so far.
I suppose for testing the new upcoming release, we should also verify whether
the G
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Mike Hoskins wrote:
> FreeBSD eng.sfo.televoke.net 4.8-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p8 #14:
> Tue Sep 23 17:30:45 PDT 2003
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ENG i386
> everything came up and seemed to start fine. i then noticed squid
> couldn't reach the 'net -- and
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 11:25 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> Exactly. I don't pay for metered utilization, but I *do* pay in lost usage
> of my relatively skinny connection. I received 8,000 (yep, that's right)
> 200K emails in one night.
Kirk (and others):
I came up with a primitive but
This is reproducable. Here is the second crashdump, its nearly
the same as the first.
GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
[Remove hostname part of this IPv6-only address to reply via IPv4, or to
eliminate the risk of a bounce, drop my address completely and I'll catch
up from the list archives Real Soon Now]
This is a really old message, but as far as I can see in recent 4.x
code, the problem still remains -- in t
Just wanted to note that this problem seems to not be isolated.
I'm seeing similar problems with RELENG_4_8 cvsup dated 00:24 09/23/03
eastern US time. Machine loses routing, reboot brings things to normal
for a few hours.
I'm not going to implement the ARP security patch on any of my other
boxe
Udo Schweigert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably said:
> I had a similar problem on two (out of 5) 4.8-p8 boxes. The only change
> between p7 and p8 was the arp-cache-security fix, so I think it's related to
> that.
I'm seeing the same thing going from p6 to p8.
On boot;
fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> If you have all the aliases on lo0 does it work ? i.e. just have
> x.y.z.33 on fxp0. However, another poster had a problem with a /20
> subnet. I wonder if its an incorrect mask calculation ?
Don't forget the bit of randomness that's part of the game,
as it appears, at l
If you have all the aliases on lo0 does it work ? i.e. just have x.y.z.33
on fxp0. However, another poster had a problem with a /20 subnet. I wonder
if its an incorrect mask calculation ?
---Mike
At 12:05 PM 24/09/2003, Pawel Malachowski wrote:
There are:
x.y.z/24 with one IP address, x
Hi!
4.9-PRERELEASE of today paniced under heavy CPU/ata load:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=57174
Eugene Grosbein
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
A "me too" on 1 of 3 machines. Had to get my collocation people to power
cycle it several times before it came up correctly.
I also had a RELENG_5_1 machine not come up after the update, but I'm not
sure if that was related.
Jon Noack
___
[EMAIL PROTEC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Tancsa
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:42 AM
To: Pawel Malachowski
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [full build as of Sept. 24] "No route to host" after certain
time...
Hi, can you clarify that
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:42:14AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> Hi, can you clarify that
>
> >My rc.local script is something like:
> >LAN0=fxp0
> >IP=192.168.x.y
> >ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${IP}/24
> >route add default 192.168.x.1
> >ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${A}/28
> >ifconfig ${LAN0} inet ad
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 22:21:28 +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have built world and kernel from -STABLE as of today (Sept. 24th).
> All seems to work well, but after a certain time (maybe hours, don't
> know really), the internet connection breaks.
>
Now i tested with my -stable sys
Hi, can you clarify that
My rc.local script is something like:
LAN0=fxp0
IP=192.168.x.y
ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${IP}/24
route add default 192.168.x.1
ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${A}/28
ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${B}/32
ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${C}/32
ifconfig ${LAN0} inet add ${D}/32
# A, B, C
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:16:07AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> What if you alias those IP address to lo0 ? Does it correct the problem ?
I've moved all /32 addresses from fxp0 to lo0, it doesn't fix the problem.
After first reboot route table was complete, however after second reboot
default rou
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 22:21:28 +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> When I reboot, all is okay again.
>
> Any ideas what has caused this in the new build?
> What should I do to investigate further?
>
I had a similar problem on two (out of 5) 4.8-p8 boxes. The only change
between p7 and p8 was the arp-ca
19 matches
Mail list logo
