Anyone knows howt to solve this prob?
Keith.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
i have that on boot:
ata0: reseting device ...done
acd0: MODE_SENSE_BIG command timeout - reseting
and next time , next time , and next time .. :>
hardware/software configuration:
freebsd 4.8
epox mainboard 4pca3+ (intel 875p)
hpt374
two maxtor hard disks (raid 1)
when i turn off
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:29:50 +0200 (CEST)
"Peter Spekreijse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We're trying to install FreeBSD 4.9/RC on a system with a
> Asus P4S533-MX board (SIS 651 chipset). This does not work
> with UDMA enabled. Is this problem known? Is there a work-around?
Yes, this p
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Jan Grant wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> > How recent is your copy of RELENG_4 ? The PSE disable code was committed
> > to the tree already as well as a fix so it would work with APM on the
> > 17th. By default it is disabled. If you look at your dmesg
Hi!
We're trying to install FreeBSD 4.9/RC on a system with a
Asus P4S533-MX board (SIS 651 chipset). This does not work
with UDMA enabled. Is this problem known? Is there a work-around?
Greetings,
Peter.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> How recent is your copy of RELENG_4 ? The PSE disable code was committed
> to the tree already as well as a fix so it would work with APM on the
> 17th. By default it is disabled. If you look at your dmesg.boot you
> should see
> Warning: Pentium 4 CPU:
How recent is your copy of RELENG_4 ? The PSE disable code was committed
to the tree already as well as a fix so it would work with APM on the
17th. By default it is disabled. If you look at your dmesg.boot you
should see
Warning: Pentium 4 CPU: PSE disabled
---Mike
At 11:38 AM 20/1
I'm tracking -STABLE on a 1.8GHz P4 with 512MB of memory. Roughly since
the PAE changes were MFCed, I've been seeing memory-corruption-related
errors under specific circumstances: for example, a run of
portsdb -fUu
can be guaranteed to generate SIGBUS, SIGILL and SIGSEGVs in a handful
of sh
> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 09:25:09 -0400
> From: Zeno Sirbu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi,
>
> Maybe this message should go to mobile.
>
> Machine: IBM ThinkPad 600 (Model 2645-85U) PII-300, 64 RAM, 4GB HDD
> Network card: Xircom CE3B-100BTX (pcmcia)
>
> I've SUP yesterd
Serious Signal wrote:
>>Well colleagues, but both of you failed to specify your onboard IDE
>>controlled
>>dmesg lines! ;-)
>>
>>*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
>
>
> Dmitry,
>
> Good catch!
>
> atapci0: port 0xe000-0xe00f at device 7.1 on pci0
> at
10 matches
Mail list logo