On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 19:38, Barney Wolff wrote:
> > Just to clarify, even typing "exit" to end the ssh session will close
> > the window but leave the ssh instance in the process list. I can't even
> > kill -9 that sucker.
>
> Are you starting any X app or anything else via a forwarded port? The
On 31 Jan, Richard Schilling wrote:
> I've had similar issues connecting via SSH to a solaris box. I thought
> it was related to the job I was running on the Solaris box, but never
> did find the answer. In my case when I exit from the other box the
> connection seems to hang. The only way to
I've had similar issues connecting via SSH to a solaris box. I thought
it was related to the job I was running on the Solaris box, but never
did find the answer. In my case when I exit from the other box the
connection seems to hang. The only way to completely terminate is to
kill the ssh pr
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 06:28:09PM -0600, Frank Knobbe wrote:
>
> Just to clarify, even typing "exit" to end the ssh session will close
> the window but leave the ssh instance in the process list. I can't even
> kill -9 that sucker.
Are you starting any X app or anything else via a forwarded port
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 09:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Has anyone else noticed that SSH session "hang around" under 4.9?
> > (Straight SSH from BSD, no port stuff).
> Hmm, does this happen also with other processes, or is it just with SSH
> currently?
Not that I noticed. When taking a look at
ipfw does stateful inspection, and I believe ipf does as well.
If you're really that fussed, pf is available in ports and
is better (imo) :]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis Antunes
> Sent: 31 January 2004 16:18
> To: [EMAIL PR
Are there any firewall ports for FreeBSD that allows for tasteful
inspection or are you limited to simple packet filtering devices?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail t
David Malone wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:38:08AM +0100, Jeroen Ubbink wrote:
ipfw doesn't seem to block router advertisements on a
bridge either. Is this just a problem with both those firewall tools or is
it a problem in FreeBSD?
Bridged packets are special and are not usually firew
David Malone wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:38:08AM +0100, Jeroen Ubbink wrote:
ipfw doesn't seem to block router advertisements on a
bridge either. Is this just a problem with both those firewall tools or is
it a problem in FreeBSD?
Bridged packets are special and are not usually firew
So you have "old" ata drives connected to an adapter to the sata controller
then?
We've currently finished by using another computer and nfs mount it. Alltho
this is not a way I really like.
Atleast it's stable now with about 500-800gig/day in io so it works.
The thought of being able to connect
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 01:43:06PM +, David Malone wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:38:08AM +0100, Jeroen Ubbink wrote:
> > ipfw doesn't seem to block router advertisements on a
> > bridge either. Is this just a problem with both those firewall tools or is
> > it a problem in FreeBSD?
>
> B
11 matches
Mail list logo
