--- Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all, it is strongly recommened that you use ports-all without
> a refuse file. It will save you pain if you want to build an INDEX
> later.
>
Hm. What's an INDEX? Some abbreviated lookup mechanism? Don't see it
in the Handbook.
> Second, a
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 12:49:20PM -0700, Rick Berger wrote:
> Hi, -
>
> Trying to cvsup ports-base (as a start). I have no ports directory,
> as of yet, so this should be a fresh cvs checkout. My supfile looks
> like this:
>
> -
> # ports supfile
>
> *default host=cvsup5.f
Hi, -
Trying to cvsup ports-base (as a start). I have no ports directory,
as of yet, so this should be a fresh cvs checkout. My supfile looks
like this:
-
# ports supfile
*default host=cvsup5.freebsd.org
*default base=/usr
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=RELEN
-Original Message-
From: Robert Wagner
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 11:14 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: man page for mbuf is not consistent with header defines (for
sure in stable 4.10-PRERELEASE)
The man page for mbuf has mbuf pkthd
Charles Sprickman typed on a keyboard not too far away, on 7/7/2004 1:56
AM:
Hi,
I've been trying to track down this problem for some time now. Since I
have a temporary fix in place, I can breathe a bit and hope someone here
has some answers (questions are good too!).
I have a dual Athlon 1600MP
Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Ken Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 06:35:27PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
There was a nasty bug just about as 4.10 went out the door with the twe
driver. I thought the fix went into the release, though. If you get a
chance you might try moving up t
