Hi,
The two files
/usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile
/usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile
both have
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5
although the first one claims to download CURRENT.
And, eh, why is the filename standard-supfile and
why not the more obvious
This host has 192 MB of RAM and 512 MB of swap.
+/sbin/mdmfs -i 4096 -s $1md $2
5 2004 . 13:54 -0800, Kris Kennaway :
See the manpage. You don't have enough RAM in your system to do that.
A bug in manpage? By default, mdmfs creates a swap-based (MD_SWAP) disk.
I'm running mdmfs
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:59:26PM -0800, Jason C. Wells wrote:
The makefile in /usr/src/share/termcap doesn't honor DESTDIR. Should it?
But it does.
Cheers,
--
Ruslan Ermilov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD committer
pgpDiuyk0otTo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 07:41:29AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I think there is a small issue with the Makefile, although I don't see
exactly what. But I'm no great shakes on Makefiles.
At the very end of the installworld, after completely the makewhatis and
/etc stuff, I got the message
Nicolás de Bari Embriz García Rojas wrote:
I am trying to use the nvidia driver from the ports on FreeBSD
5.3-STABLE but every time i startup X the system crash
My system:
Laptop: Dell latitud D800
video card: GeForce FX Go5200
I attached a console to the laptop and i got this:
---
NVRM: detected
Rob wrote:
[...]
both have
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5
although the first one claims to download CURRENT.
And, eh, why is the filename standard-supfile and
why not the more obvious current-supfile ?
It only claims, but it doesn't bring you -CURRENT. That's the reason why it
Would people be kind enough to have a look at the following script and
tell me what horrors/faux pas/stupid things I have done?
The script is an almost automated way to upgrade all your ports to the
latest version.
Of course, I bet someone else has done this and I'll be told to RTFM.
My
Bjrn Knig wrote:
Rob wrote:
[...]
both have
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5
although the first one claims to download CURRENT.
And, eh, why is the filename standard-supfile and
why not the more obvious current-supfile ?
It only claims, but it doesn't bring you -CURRENT.
That's the reason
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 03:54:45PM +0100, Richard Arends wrote:
Again replying to my own message :(
On my laptop i am running 5.2.1-RELEASE-p11. A few weeks ago i upgraded
it to 5.3 BETA7. After building world i went to single user mode, to
complete the upgrade. After a few seconds running
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 10:39:02AM +, Yann Golanski wrote:
Would people be kind enough to have a look at the following script and
tell me what horrors/faux pas/stupid things I have done?
The script is an almost automated way to upgrade all your ports to the
latest version.
Without
Rob wrote:
If so, then why do we have a standard-supfile and a stable-supfile
doing the same thing? If both bring you -STABLE, one of the two seems
to be redundant to me and having two sup files doing the same only
causes confusion.
Maybe you're right. There is a kind of redundancy now, but
Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hello!
[... Kernel loading and starting just fine ...]
Mounting root from nfs:
NFS ROOT: 10.0.0.110:/cdrom
init: not found in path
I don't know where to look or how to debug my problem.
When querying DNS with 'host' command I get two extra prints for _all_
CNAME hosts ( and MX queries are interpreted as valid answers).
Do I have some odd leftovers from Bind 8.3 - 9.0 update, since this
machine was 5.3-BETA1 when
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 18:30:59 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Sm_rgrav) wrote:
Alex Povolotsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have an external AOPEN CD-RW with USB interface, it works fine
with 4.10, but doesn't work with 5.ANY (including 5.3BETA7).
5.x DOES see umass device, but doesn't
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 07:41:29 -0800, Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think there is a small issue with the Makefile, although I don't see
exactly what. But I'm no great shakes on Makefiles.
Take a look:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-July/031497.html
btw, you
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 05:39, Yann Golanski wrote:
### Variouse ports that need stuff... Where should I put those?
# X11
X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xorg
# mutt
WITH_MUTT_MBOX_HOOK_PATCH=yes
MAIL_GID=mail
# rxvt
WITH_MOUSEWHEEL=yes
WITH_RXVT_SCROLLBAR=yes
WITH_MENUBAR=yes
# imp3
WITH_APACHE2=yes
Rob wrote:
both have
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5
although the first one claims to download CURRENT.
And, eh, why is the filename standard-supfile and
why not the more obvious current-supfile ?
It only claims, but it doesn't bring you -CURRENT. That's the reason why
it should not be
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 10:39:02AM +, Yann Golanski said:
Would people be kind enough to have a look at the following script and
tell me what horrors/faux pas/stupid things I have done?
The script is an almost automated way to upgrade all your ports to the
latest version.
I tried a
my box is a dell latitude d400 laptop.
dmesg output:
umass0: Dell USB Drive A01, rev 2.00/1.04, addr 2
umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED)
umass0: Phase Error, residue = 0
umass0: Phase Error, residue = 0
umass0: Phase Error, residue = 0
umass0: Phase Error, residue = 0
umass0: Phase
Rob wrote:
Björn König wrote:
Rob wrote:
[...]
both have
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5
although the first one claims to download CURRENT.
And, eh, why is the filename standard-supfile and
why not the more obvious current-supfile ?
It only claims, but it doesn't bring you
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 05:15:13PM +0900, Rob wrote:
The two files
/usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile
/usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile
both have
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5
although the first one claims to download CURRENT.
And, eh, why is the
Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 08:57:54 -0800
From: Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I just recently joined this list and I am getting more spam than -stable
posts. Is this normal these days? I was on -current and it had its
share of spam, but it wasn't too
Hi All,
Since my upgrade to 4.10 Stable in mid-Octobor I have been experiencing
some named cache
poisoning. This is remarkebly similar to problems that I had back around
September of 2003 that
were fixed then for the 4.9 version of FreeBSD. I guess the questions for
the group are:
1. Has
On Nov 8, 2004, at 4:20 PM, Charles Swiger wrote:
So long as the system has enough memory available for the working sets
of the processes being run, FreeBSD will use the rest of the memory
for caching stuff from the filesystem without needing any special
tuning.
Are you sure of this? The disk
Hello!
It's a small bug in 5.x after 5.2.1-RELEASE. Please look for a simple
work-around at:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.53.0410200513490.87738
That did it - thanks a lot.
Regards,
Patrick M. Hausen
Leiter Netzwerke und Sicherheit
--
punkt.de GmbH Internet -
Hello I will remove device agp from the kernel, what other options
should i use for re-installing the nvidia driver from the ports?
right now I have this packages on my system:
linux_base-8-8.0_4
and
XFree86-4.4.0_1,1
and this on /boo/loader.con:
ndis_load=YES
if_ndis_load=YES
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:15:15 +0200
From: Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--a1QUDc0q7S3U7/Jg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 07:41:29AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I think
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Nov 8, 2004, at 4:20 PM, Charles Swiger wrote:
So long as the system has enough memory available for the working sets
of the processes being run, FreeBSD will use the rest of the memory
for caching stuff from the filesystem without needing any special tuning.
Are you sure
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 09:56:36AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
[...]
I can believe that I did, and that might be a good explanation. I won't
claim to being a good typist, as most every message I spell check can
affirm. But what is the install target? It's at least not documented in
Makefile
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 05:15:13PM +0900, Rob wrote:
The two files
/usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile
/usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile
both have
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5
Ceri Davies wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 05:15:13PM +0900, Rob wrote:
The two files
/usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile
/usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile
both have
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5
Hi,
I've recvsuped and removed /usr/src and /usr/obj, same symtoms in
RELENG_5 and RELENG_5_3. Is this expected/known?
--
stage 1.2: bootstrap tools
--
cd /usr/src;
Hi,
I updated my server at home from a -CURRENT from june 7 to
5.3-RELEASE, and now I'm seeing this panic whenever someone behind
this gateway starts emule and opens a lot of connections:
http://www.piwebs.com/freebsd/pagefault-network.jpg
The panic doesn't occur with the -CURRENT kernel from
Hi everybody!
I'm with FreeBSD 5.3 and i want to share my Internet connection with one
more PC not with entire LAN. I have IP 10.0.54.128. The LAN has
10.0.54.0\24. I want to share on one PC with IP 10.0.54.8
My connection to Internet is via pptp:
saiman# ifconfig tun0
tun0:
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:38:10 +0300,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This host has 192 MB of RAM and 512 MB of swap.
+ /sbin/mdmfs -i 4096 -s $1md $2
5 2004 . 13:54 -0800, Kris Kennaway :
See the manpage. You don't have enough RAM in your system to do that.
A bug in manpage? By default,
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 08:00:57PM +0100, Joan Picanyol wrote:
sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -o root -g wheel -m 555 strfile
/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/games
install: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/games/strfile: chown/chgrp:
Operation not permitted
*** Error code 71
You are not
On 2004-11-09 at 20:00:57 Joan Picanyol wrote:
=== games/fortune/strfile
...
sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -o root -g wheel -m 555 strfile
/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/games
install: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/games/strfile:
chown/chgrp: Operation not permitted
*** Error code 71
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Arjan Van Leeuwen wrote:
I updated my server at home from a -CURRENT from june 7 to 5.3-RELEASE,
and now I'm seeing this panic whenever someone behind this gateway
starts emule and opens a lot of connections:
http://www.piwebs.com/freebsd/pagefault-network.jpg
The
to file and line number in the source? This is a NULL pointer
dereference, so presumably somewhere there is a poor assumption about
memory allocation or the like.
dmesg is attached.
# addr2line -e kernel.debug.20041109 0xc06544a0
/usr/src/sys/sys/libkern.h:56
How do I get the function+offsets
Never mind, I think I've figured it out. I hope this helps:
winston# addr2line -f -e kernel.debug.20041109 0xc06544a0
m_copydata
/usr/src/sys/sys/libkern.h:56
winston# addr2line -f -e kernel.debug.20041109 0xC06AF6A5
icmp_error
./machine/endian.h:171
winston# addr2line -f -e kernel.debug.20041109
From: /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver/work/NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86-1.0-6113/doc/README
__
(sec-05) CHOOSING THE AGP GART DRIVER
__
Similar to the NVIDIA Linux
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 06:40:38PM +, Ceri Davies wrote:
stable-supfile is correct then; we just need to correct the README.
How about this patch for src/share/examples/cvsup/README on RELENG_5
(will become FreeBSD 5.4):
Index: README
[forwarded from ports@, seemed to belong here]
Hi all,
Does anyone know when a thread-safe nvidia-driver will be available?
After upgrading to 5.3-RELEASE and KDE-3.3.1, I noticed some newly
compiled KDE apps (e.g. kile and skim) core dump at start. The
backtraces of the core files show that
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know when a thread-safe nvidia-driver will be available?
After upgrading to 5.3-RELEASE and KDE-3.3.1, I noticed some newly
compiled KDE apps (e.g. kile and skim) core dump at start. The
backtraces of the core files show
On Tuesday, 9. November 2004 23:30, Jie Gao wrote:
After upgrading to 5.3-RELEASE and KDE-3.3.1, I noticed some newly
compiled KDE apps (e.g. kile and skim) core dump at start.
Can you please try recompiling kile as described in this message
Just to edify all I was getting constant calcru:
negative messages and I isolated it to ACPI. To
remedy this I put an entry in the device.hints file to
disable ACPI. Now to edify me; Is this a good
aproach? Any issues by not having ACPI loaded? Thank
you all and to all a good night!
Doing all this described on (sec-05) dont work I have allready compile
the kernel with out the device agp, tried Option NvAGP 0,1,2,3 and
still having the same results, kernel still crashing.
any more ideas?
regards
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:59:03 +1030, Wilkinson, Alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
0n Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 09:37:37PM -0600, Nicolás de Bari Embriz García
Rojas wrote:
Doing all this described on (sec-05) dont work I have allready compile
the kernel with out the device agp, tried Option NvAGP 0,1,2,3 and
still having the same results, kernel
On Wednesday, 10. November 2004 04:15, Dean Patterson wrote:
Just to edify all I was getting constant calcru:
negative messages and I isolated it to ACPI. To
remedy this I put an entry in the device.hints file to
disable ACPI. Now to edify me; Is this a good
aproach?
If it fixes your
I tried that patch but rejected. Afterwards I examined the Makefiles
manually, and did a
sed s/-lpthread/-pthread/g
but still no help.
I don't know if the problem I am having is the same as the one you
stated. My programs work well when using nv driver. The core dumps
only happen when I'm
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 08:00:57PM +0100, Joan Picanyol wrote:
Hi,
I've recvsuped and removed /usr/src and /usr/obj, same symtoms in
RELENG_5 and RELENG_5_3. Is this expected/known?
--
stage 1.2: bootstrap tools
subscribe
This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential,
may be legally privileged and is designated exclusively
for the intended recipient. Access by any other person is
not authorised. Any disclosure of this e-mail or of names
of persons mentioned therein as well as any storing,
52 matches
Mail list logo
