I think I'm ok with the pass through devices:
# camcontrol devlist
OEI-USB2 CompactFlash 2.00 at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,da0)
SONY DVD RW DW-U18A UYS1 at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,cd0)
# ls -l /dev | grep pass
crw--- 1 root operator 31, 0 Oct 12 13:17
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, flip vernooy wrote:
Scott Sewall wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 4.10 and trying to make a data DVD. I've
following the procedure outlined in the handbook without any success.
Any hints or advise would be grealty appreciated.
-- Scott
lilo# growisofs
* Scott Sewall [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20041203 10:11]:
Scott Sewall wrote:
lilo# growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/cd0 -J -R blitz10
:-( unable to open(/dev/cd0,O_RDONLY): No such file or directory
ls -l /dev/cd0 ?
# grep atapi /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/LILO
device atapicd
Joan Picanyol wrote:
# grep atapi /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/LILO
device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives
You don't need this, but
device scbus
device da
device cd
Does atapicam really work without atapicd in the kernel? Just a question, I
never actually tried.
--
,_, | Michael
I'm trying to get ARLA work stable on FreeBSD (5.3-RELEASE) but have
found that it sometimes hangs: A process gets stuck in 'ckvnlk' state.
I have found someting strange (probably a bug) but I need a second
opinion.
I patched fs/deadfs/dead_vnops so it does a panic when it tries to go
into ckvnlk
* Michael Nottebrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20041203 10:52]:
Joan Picanyol wrote:
# grep atapi /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/LILO
device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives
You don't need this, but
device scbus
device da
device cd
Does atapicam really work without atapicd
Joan Picanyol wrote:
* Michael Nottebrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20041203 10:52]:
Joan Picanyol wrote:
# grep atapi /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/LILO
device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives
You don't need this, but
device scbus
device da
device cd
Does atapicam really
On Dec 3, 2004, at 11:46 AM, nicky wrote:
Joan Picanyol wrote:
: -- snip
Do you have the devices /dev/cd0x etc?
Sorry 'bout intruding on this thread, but I have just one question.
I use ATAPICAM on a FreeBSD5.3R system, with a Pioneer DVR-108
dual layer with great success. Well, almost then
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:17:49 +0100, Stein Morten Sandbech [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My only problem are when an operation on the unit fails, the
/dev/cd0 device disappears, and a mknod to recreate the device
doesn't work either.
The most recent causes have been using cdda2wav.
As of now,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:31:09 +0100, Godwin Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
but sometimes it gets thrown into limbo and the only way to resume
operation is to perform a hard reset
Sorry for the self-fup but a thought occurred to me.
Stein, have you tried camcontrol reset n,n,n to reset the DVD
On Dec 3, 2004, at 1:38 PM, Godwin Stewart wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:31:09 +0100, Godwin Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
but sometimes it gets thrown into limbo and the only way to resume
operation is to perform a hard reset
Sorry for the self-fup but a thought occurred to me.
Stein, have
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:40:53PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 10:48:43AM +1000, Joel Hatton wrote:
I'm backing up a 5.x machine at the moment with this command:
dump -0Lau -b128 -f - /var | gzip -2 | ssh FreeBSD4 dd of=aacd0s1f.gz
After the dump finishes, I try
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 02:24:15PM +, Ceri Davies wrote:
Should I expect a dump taken from 4.X to be restorable on 5.X though?
(I do).
Yes.
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there, funny things
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 09:27:07AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 02:24:15PM +, Ceri Davies wrote:
Should I expect a dump taken from 4.X to be restorable on 5.X though?
(I do).
Yes.
Phew.
Ceri
--
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and
Hi Everybody,
I have a little question about the UPDATING file on RELENG_5 branch. I
have received a security advisory about procfs for my FreeBSD-STABLE.
While looking the text of this mail, I saw that the UPDATING file was
updating on all RELENG_X.X branches but not in the stable branch. Why
Matthias Buelow wrote:
Pertti Kosunen wrote:
The newer cards work very well. I have a X800se PCI-Express card
and it works like a charm with X.org 6.8.1 on 5.3. The only thing
that's
Isn't that pretty expencive for 2d use?
Yes.. that's why I also have Windows installed for a game every now
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 13:26:20 -0500, Jason Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
IMHO, if you just want 2D, pretty much any bottom of the barrel card
will work.
I'd add that Matrox cards are excellent in the 2D arena. I still have an old
G200 here and It beats the socks off the ATI Rage128 I also
Hopefully this is the correct mailing list, if not, please let me know
a more suitable one.
I'm setting up a Supermicro 1U server, (6014HX8B: dual Xeon, 2GB ram,
hot swappable scsi backplane, dual GB nics, etc...)
I tried installing FBSD 5.3 release on it, but I received the following
error
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 07:34:50PM +0100, Godwin Stewart wrote:
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 13:26:20 -0500, Jason Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
IMHO, if you just want 2D, pretty much any bottom of the barrel card
will work.
I'd add that Matrox cards are excellent in the 2D arena. I still
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 22:45:32 +0100, Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For 3D you have to load the agp and radeon modules.
This is a Rage128, not a Radeon.
agp is built into the kernel and r128 is already kldloaded.
I tried kldloading radeon anyway and running glxgears. It can't do any
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:09:06PM +0100, Godwin Stewart wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 22:45:32 +0100, Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For 3D you have to load the agp and radeon modules.
This is a Rage128, not a Radeon.
I was indeed referring to a Radeon.
agp is built into the kernel
On 2004.12.03 19:08:14 +0100, ptitoliv wrote:
I have a little question about the UPDATING file on RELENG_5 branch. I
have received a security advisory about procfs for my FreeBSD-STABLE.
While looking the text of this mail, I saw that the UPDATING file was
updating on all RELENG_X.X
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 00:01:29 +0100, Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried kldloading radeon anyway and running glxgears. It can't do any
better than about 10 fps at 1024x768/24bits.
My radeon gives 560 - 580 fps with direct rendering. An R128 would
probably be somewhat slower.
I'd just like to post a follow up to this, and thanks ... one of our
servers crashed tonight, after being up and running for ~67days ...
normally, I'd be cursing, because after *that* long, the fsck would take
about 12 hours or so ...
The server rebooted, fsck'd and dump'd a core file in 60
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 12:35:49AM +0100, Godwin Stewart wrote:
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 00:01:29 +0100, Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried kldloading radeon anyway and running glxgears. It can't do any
better than about 10 fps at 1024x768/24bits.
My radeon gives 560 - 580 fps
Godwin Stewart wrote:
I'd add that Matrox cards are excellent in the 2D arena. I still have an old
G200 here and It beats the socks off the ATI Rage128 I also have as far as
clarity and general piqu are concerned.
Obviously, the Rage128 does better than the G200 in the 3D department,
although not
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 02:36:09PM +, Ceri Davies wrote:
Should I expect a dump taken from 4.X to be restorable on 5.X though?
Yes.
Phew.
I didn't even think about the possibility of dump not being forwards
compatible (8-(
In passing, you may find the buffer port useful. I spent a
I've been experimenting with various cards, most cheap. The monitors are
HP P1110 21 surplus, very bright (too bright) and very sharp. These are
the PC version with VGA connectors, not the ones with BNC connectors.
I currently have a Matrox G450 in dual-head mode under 5.3-STABLE with
Xorg,
Hi,
When I search a port with 'whereis', I get different results
on my 4.10 and 5.3 systems. For example
4.10 $ whereis lyx
/usr/ports/print/lyx /usr/ports/japanese/lyx
5.3 $ whereis lyx
/usr/ports/japanese/lyx
Why this difference?
On both systems /usr/ports/print/lyx exists.
Similar cases are
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 02:23:13PM +0900, Rob wrote:
Hi,
When I search a port with 'whereis', I get different results
on my 4.10 and 5.3 systems. For example
4.10 $ whereis lyx
/usr/ports/print/lyx /usr/ports/japanese/lyx
5.3 $ whereis lyx
/usr/ports/japanese/lyx
Why this
30 matches
Mail list logo
